本文選題：軍產(chǎn)房　切入點(diǎn)：房地產(chǎn)　出處：《湖南師范大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：軍產(chǎn)房嚴(yán)格來說不是一個(gè)法律概念。隨著房地產(chǎn)市場(chǎng)興起而逐漸為人們所熟知。軍產(chǎn)房長(zhǎng)期以來處于法律監(jiān)管缺位狀態(tài),導(dǎo)致軍產(chǎn)房轉(zhuǎn)讓,置換可以過程中被用來牟取私利。原海軍副司令王守業(yè),總后勤部副部長(zhǎng)谷俊山都曾擔(dān)任總后勤部基建部部長(zhǎng)一職,都在其職位上進(jìn)行了嚴(yán)重的腐敗行為。王守業(yè)在負(fù)責(zé)全軍的營(yíng)房改造過程中掌握大權(quán),與承包商暗中勾結(jié),負(fù)責(zé)建房的承包商大肆賄賂王守業(yè),他還利用了軍隊(duì)住房改革的補(bǔ)貼政策貪污房款。谷俊山在軍用土地的征用、置換過程中,獲得巨大的利益,谷俊山在為什么可以批準(zhǔn)這些不合理、不合法的項(xiàng)目?不言自明,制度漏洞帶來的巨大的利益。軍產(chǎn)房權(quán)屬之所以模糊不清,是因?yàn)椴筷?duì)所占有的土地及不少房產(chǎn),在計(jì)劃經(jīng)濟(jì)時(shí)期,由地方政府無償劃撥給軍隊(duì)使用,甚至連基本的書面合同都沒有。所以其權(quán)屬一直有爭(zhēng)議,需要軍地雙方進(jìn)行協(xié)調(diào)裁決。伴隨著房地產(chǎn)市場(chǎng)供求關(guān)系不平衡,房?jī)r(jià)持續(xù)走高,軍隊(duì)各單位利用軍用土地進(jìn)行房地產(chǎn)經(jīng)營(yíng)的熱情也高漲。市場(chǎng)上流通的軍產(chǎn)房以便宜的價(jià)格,不受“限購(gòu)令”的約束而備受青睞。軍隊(duì)高級(jí)干部利用房地產(chǎn)尋租的行為也就泛濫開來。2013年,針對(duì)谷俊山案件,中央軍委決定在全軍進(jìn)行大規(guī)模軍產(chǎn)房普查清理,俗稱“兩普工作”。查清現(xiàn)有軍產(chǎn)房的基本情況,建立完善房產(chǎn)基礎(chǔ)數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù)和基本建設(shè)項(xiàng)目排序。通過健全信息技術(shù)手段、完善法律法規(guī)制度體系,逐步實(shí)現(xiàn)軍產(chǎn)房資源可視掌控、基建營(yíng)房管理科學(xué)規(guī)范。普查的重點(diǎn)在于監(jiān)控房地產(chǎn)的出租轉(zhuǎn)讓,嚴(yán)格控制軍隊(duì)場(chǎng)館樓房的建設(shè),清理干部不合理住房,不斷完善軍隊(duì)人員安置住房保障制度政策。本文認(rèn)為,普查清理工作不是治本之策,應(yīng)當(dāng)采取標(biāo)本兼治。針對(duì)軍產(chǎn)房現(xiàn)存的諸多負(fù)面事實(shí),對(duì)軍產(chǎn)房進(jìn)行類型區(qū)分,完善監(jiān)管制度。軍產(chǎn)房暴露出的軍隊(duì)立法和地方不能相互銜接,各成體系的問題。如何保障軍人的住房問題,規(guī)范軍產(chǎn)房的經(jīng)營(yíng)。如何解決長(zhǎng)期以來軍隊(duì)法律供給不足,管理不善。本文要對(duì)軍產(chǎn)房問題進(jìn)行系統(tǒng)的梳理,從現(xiàn)行立法和管理的漏洞,分析軍產(chǎn)房存在的制度漏洞、法律風(fēng)險(xiǎn),找出問題的癥結(jié)并借鑒國(guó)外的經(jīng)驗(yàn)提出解決的方法。
[Abstract]:Military property is not strictly a legal concept. With the rise of the real estate market, people are gradually familiar. Military houses have long been in a state of lack of legal supervision, leading to the transfer of military houses. The replacement can be used for personal gain in the process. Wang Shouye, the former deputy commander of the Navy, and Gu Junshan, deputy director of the General Logistics Department, all held the post of head of the infrastructure department of the General Logistics Department. Wang Shouye was in charge of the transformation of barracks throughout the army, and colluded secretly with contractors, who were in charge of building houses and bribing Wang Shouye. He also used the subsidy policy of the army housing reform to embezzle the housing funds. Gu Junshan gained huge benefits in the process of expropriation and replacement of military land. Why can Gu Junshan approve these unreasonable and illegal projects? It goes without saying that the huge benefits brought about by the loopholes in the system. The reason why the ownership of military houses is unclear is that the land and many real estate occupied by the troops were allocated to the army for use by the local governments without compensation during the planned economy period. There is no even a basic written contract. Therefore, the ownership of the contract has always been controversial and requires a coordinated ruling between the military and the local authorities. With the imbalance between supply and demand in the real estate market, housing prices continue to rise. The enthusiasm of all military units to use military land for real estate management is also high. Military property houses circulating in the market are being sold at cheap prices. The practice of rent-seeking by senior military cadres using real estate has been rampant. In 2013, in response to the Gu Junshan case, the Central military Commission decided to conduct a large-scale military house census and clean-up in the entire army. Commonly known as "two popular work," to find out the basic situation of the existing military labor room, to establish and improve the housing infrastructure database and infrastructure project ranking. Through sound information technology means, improve the system of laws and regulations, Gradually realize the visible control of the resources of the military delivery rooms, the scientific standard of the management of the infrastructure barracks. The focus of the census is to monitor the rental and transfer of real estate, strictly control the construction of military stadiums and buildings, and clean up the unreasonable housing of cadres. This article holds that the general survey and cleaning up work is not the solution to the root cause, and should be dealt with both at the root and the root of the problem. In the light of the many negative facts existing in the military maternity room, the article distinguishes the type of the military delivery room. Perfecting the supervision system. The military legislation and the localities exposed by the military delivery rooms cannot be linked up with each other. How to ensure the housing problems of the military personnel and standardize the management of the military maternity houses? how to solve the long-standing shortage of the military law supply? This paper systematically combs the problem of military maternity room, analyzes the system loophole and legal risk of military delivery room, and draws lessons from the experience of foreign countries to solve the problem.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D922.29

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王利明;關(guān)于物權(quán)法草案中確立的不動(dòng)產(chǎn)物權(quán)變動(dòng)模式[J];法學(xué);2005年08期

2 常鵬翱;;不動(dòng)產(chǎn)登記法的立法定位與展望[J];法學(xué);2010年03期

3 王碎別;新形勢(shì)下軍隊(duì)房地產(chǎn)管理中存在的問題及對(duì)策[J];中國(guó)房地產(chǎn);1994年08期

4 梁軍;;軍產(chǎn)房買賣合同糾紛的法院受理[J];法制與社會(huì);2011年28期

5 吳應(yīng)進(jìn);任振源;;關(guān)于完善軍隊(duì)住房保障制度的思考[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究導(dǎo)刊;2012年01期

6 王利明;試論我國(guó)不動(dòng)產(chǎn)登記制度的完善(下)[J];求索;2001年06期

7 張朝暉;;軍事利益本位論——兼論軍事審判權(quán)的范圍[J];西安政治學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年03期

8 王利明;關(guān)于我國(guó)物權(quán)法制訂中的若干疑難問題的探討（下）[J];政法論壇;1995年06期

9 孫憲忠;論不動(dòng)產(chǎn)物權(quán)登記[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);1996年05期

10 張慶一;軍隊(duì)房地產(chǎn)開發(fā)與房地產(chǎn)經(jīng)營(yíng)辨析[J];中國(guó)土地;1994年09期

，

本文編號(hào)：1674355