本文選題：軍產房　切入點：房地產　出處：《湖南師范大學》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：軍產房嚴格來說不是一個法律概念。隨著房地產市場興起而逐漸為人們所熟知。軍產房長期以來處于法律監(jiān)管缺位狀態(tài),導致軍產房轉讓,置換可以過程中被用來牟取私利。原海軍副司令王守業(yè),總后勤部副部長谷俊山都曾擔任總后勤部基建部部長一職,都在其職位上進行了嚴重的腐敗行為。王守業(yè)在負責全軍的營房改造過程中掌握大權,與承包商暗中勾結,負責建房的承包商大肆賄賂王守業(yè),他還利用了軍隊住房改革的補貼政策貪污房款。谷俊山在軍用土地的征用、置換過程中,獲得巨大的利益,谷俊山在為什么可以批準這些不合理、不合法的項目?不言自明,制度漏洞帶來的巨大的利益。軍產房權屬之所以模糊不清,是因為部隊所占有的土地及不少房產,在計劃經濟時期,由地方政府無償劃撥給軍隊使用,甚至連基本的書面合同都沒有。所以其權屬一直有爭議,需要軍地雙方進行協(xié)調裁決。伴隨著房地產市場供求關系不平衡,房價持續(xù)走高,軍隊各單位利用軍用土地進行房地產經營的熱情也高漲。市場上流通的軍產房以便宜的價格,不受“限購令”的約束而備受青睞。軍隊高級干部利用房地產尋租的行為也就泛濫開來。2013年,針對谷俊山案件,中央軍委決定在全軍進行大規(guī)模軍產房普查清理,俗稱“兩普工作”。查清現(xiàn)有軍產房的基本情況,建立完善房產基礎數(shù)據庫和基本建設項目排序。通過健全信息技術手段、完善法律法規(guī)制度體系,逐步實現(xiàn)軍產房資源可視掌控、基建營房管理科學規(guī)范。普查的重點在于監(jiān)控房地產的出租轉讓,嚴格控制軍隊場館樓房的建設,清理干部不合理住房,不斷完善軍隊人員安置住房保障制度政策。本文認為,普查清理工作不是治本之策,應當采取標本兼治。針對軍產房現(xiàn)存的諸多負面事實,對軍產房進行類型區(qū)分,完善監(jiān)管制度。軍產房暴露出的軍隊立法和地方不能相互銜接,各成體系的問題。如何保障軍人的住房問題,規(guī)范軍產房的經營。如何解決長期以來軍隊法律供給不足,管理不善。本文要對軍產房問題進行系統(tǒng)的梳理,從現(xiàn)行立法和管理的漏洞,分析軍產房存在的制度漏洞、法律風險,找出問題的癥結并借鑒國外的經驗提出解決的方法。
[Abstract]:Military property is not strictly a legal concept. With the rise of the real estate market, people are gradually familiar. Military houses have long been in a state of lack of legal supervision, leading to the transfer of military houses. The replacement can be used for personal gain in the process. Wang Shouye, the former deputy commander of the Navy, and Gu Junshan, deputy director of the General Logistics Department, all held the post of head of the infrastructure department of the General Logistics Department. Wang Shouye was in charge of the transformation of barracks throughout the army, and colluded secretly with contractors, who were in charge of building houses and bribing Wang Shouye. He also used the subsidy policy of the army housing reform to embezzle the housing funds. Gu Junshan gained huge benefits in the process of expropriation and replacement of military land. Why can Gu Junshan approve these unreasonable and illegal projects? It goes without saying that the huge benefits brought about by the loopholes in the system. The reason why the ownership of military houses is unclear is that the land and many real estate occupied by the troops were allocated to the army for use by the local governments without compensation during the planned economy period. There is no even a basic written contract. Therefore, the ownership of the contract has always been controversial and requires a coordinated ruling between the military and the local authorities. With the imbalance between supply and demand in the real estate market, housing prices continue to rise. The enthusiasm of all military units to use military land for real estate management is also high. Military property houses circulating in the market are being sold at cheap prices. The practice of rent-seeking by senior military cadres using real estate has been rampant. In 2013, in response to the Gu Junshan case, the Central military Commission decided to conduct a large-scale military house census and clean-up in the entire army. Commonly known as "two popular work," to find out the basic situation of the existing military labor room, to establish and improve the housing infrastructure database and infrastructure project ranking. Through sound information technology means, improve the system of laws and regulations, Gradually realize the visible control of the resources of the military delivery rooms, the scientific standard of the management of the infrastructure barracks. The focus of the census is to monitor the rental and transfer of real estate, strictly control the construction of military stadiums and buildings, and clean up the unreasonable housing of cadres. This article holds that the general survey and cleaning up work is not the solution to the root cause, and should be dealt with both at the root and the root of the problem. In the light of the many negative facts existing in the military maternity room, the article distinguishes the type of the military delivery room. Perfecting the supervision system. The military legislation and the localities exposed by the military delivery rooms cannot be linked up with each other. How to ensure the housing problems of the military personnel and standardize the management of the military maternity houses? how to solve the long-standing shortage of the military law supply? This paper systematically combs the problem of military maternity room, analyzes the system loophole and legal risk of military delivery room, and draws lessons from the experience of foreign countries to solve the problem.
【學位授予單位】：湖南師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D922.29

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 王利明;關于物權法草案中確立的不動產物權變動模式[J];法學;2005年08期

2 常鵬翱;;不動產登記法的立法定位與展望[J];法學;2010年03期

3 王碎別;新形勢下軍隊房地產管理中存在的問題及對策[J];中國房地產;1994年08期

4 梁軍;;軍產房買賣合同糾紛的法院受理[J];法制與社會;2011年28期

5 吳應進;任振源;;關于完善軍隊住房保障制度的思考[J];經濟研究導刊;2012年01期

6 王利明;試論我國不動產登記制度的完善(下)[J];求索;2001年06期

7 張朝暉;;軍事利益本位論——兼論軍事審判權的范圍[J];西安政治學院學報;2008年03期

8 王利明;關于我國物權法制訂中的若干疑難問題的探討（下）[J];政法論壇;1995年06期

9 孫憲忠;論不動產物權登記[J];中國法學;1996年05期

10 張慶一;軍隊房地產開發(fā)與房地產經營辨析[J];中國土地;1994年09期

，

本文編號：1674355