本文選題：公權(quán)力　切入點(diǎn)：私權(quán)利　出處：《北京化工大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：開(kāi)國(guó)以來(lái)，百?gòu)U待興。為了彌補(bǔ)戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)的創(chuàng)傷，趕上世界發(fā)展的潮流，政府決定建立計(jì)劃經(jīng)濟(jì)體制。而隨著社會(huì)與經(jīng)濟(jì)的不斷發(fā)展，，計(jì)劃經(jīng)濟(jì)時(shí)代的全能型政府已經(jīng)不能適應(yīng)時(shí)代的發(fā)展，服務(wù)型政府已經(jīng)成為了世界發(fā)展的主流。我國(guó)急需政府職能的轉(zhuǎn)變。這一轉(zhuǎn)變必然導(dǎo)致政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)制度的轉(zhuǎn)變。而住房制度改革是經(jīng)濟(jì)制度轉(zhuǎn)變中不可或缺的內(nèi)容。回首展望中國(guó)改革開(kāi)放的發(fā)展歷程，我們發(fā)現(xiàn)住房制度改革可謂是公眾關(guān)注的一大焦點(diǎn)。從福利分房到到停止福利分房，再到銷(xiāo)售商品房直至現(xiàn)在的房產(chǎn)泡沫危機(jī)，房地產(chǎn)行業(yè)的每一步發(fā)展都是一大看點(diǎn)。房屋作為人們生存生活的最基本保障，其改革的意義已不言而喻。通過(guò)對(duì)住房體制改革的研究，我們發(fā)現(xiàn)，住房體制改革的過(guò)程就是公權(quán)力逐步退出房屋使用管理領(lǐng)域，私權(quán)利逐步介入的過(guò)程。而在這一過(guò)程中產(chǎn)生了諸多問(wèn)題。這些問(wèn)題最主要的表現(xiàn)為：私權(quán)利無(wú)法高效有力的解決在房屋使用管理過(guò)程中產(chǎn)生的問(wèn)題。 因此，如何解決這一問(wèn)題成為了本文研究的核心。本文提出的觀點(diǎn)是：不能單純的依靠私權(quán)利解決房屋使用管理問(wèn)題，公權(quán)力與私權(quán)的共治才是最好的管理方式。首先，房屋使用管理領(lǐng)域內(nèi)留有公權(quán)力介入的空間，即公權(quán)力的介入是可行的，這是公權(quán)力介入的前提；其次，公權(quán)力的介入方式也是有章可循的，即公權(quán)力可以以法律以及行政法規(guī)為授權(quán)依據(jù)，將行政權(quán)力授予相關(guān)組織；最后，明確法律與行政法規(guī)的相關(guān)內(nèi)容。在房屋使用管理領(lǐng)域?qū)嵭泄焦仓斡衅淇尚兄帲鋵⒅匦率崂矸课菔褂霉芾黻P(guān)系，并對(duì)公權(quán)與私權(quán)重新配置，最終達(dá)到維護(hù)業(yè)主自身利益的目的。
[Abstract]:In order to make up for the trauma of the war and catch up with the trend of world development, the government decided to establish a planned economic system. But with the continuous development of society and economy, The omnipotent government in the planned economy era has been unable to adapt to the development of the times, and the service-oriented government has become the mainstream of the world's development. The reform of the housing system is an indispensable part of the transformation of the economic system. Looking back at the development of China's reform and opening up, We find that housing system reform is a major focus of public attention. From the distribution of welfare housing to the suspension of welfare housing, to the sale of commercial housing until the current housing bubble crisis, Every step of the development of the real estate industry is a big focus. Housing as the most basic guarantee of people's survival and life, its significance of reform has been self-evident. Through the study of the housing system reform, we found, The process of housing system reform is the gradual withdrawal of public power from the field of housing use management. In this process, many problems have arisen. These problems are mainly manifested in that the private rights can not solve the problems in the process of building use management efficiently and effectively. Therefore, how to solve this problem has become the core of this study. The viewpoint of this paper is that we can not simply rely on private rights to solve the problem of housing use management, the common governance of public power and private right is the best management method. In the field of housing use management, there is room for public power to intervene, that is, the intervention of public power is feasible, which is the premise of public power intervention; secondly, there are rules to follow in the way of public power intervention. That is, public power can be authorized on the basis of laws and administrative regulations, and the administrative power can be delegated to relevant organizations. Finally, it is feasible to make clear the relevant contents of laws and administrative regulations. It will rearrange the relationship between the use and management of the house and reconfigure the public right and private right so as to protect the owner's own interests.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：北京化工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D922.29

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 申衛(wèi)星;;構(gòu)建公權(quán)與私權(quán)平衡下的中國(guó)物權(quán)法[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2008年04期

2 周江濤;;公權(quán)與私權(quán)的博弈——試論“公共利益”的界定[J];法制與社會(huì);2009年25期

3 朱冰;;公共物問(wèn)題的法律探析[J];貴州社會(huì)科學(xué);2007年08期

4 何政泉;楊莉;;論我國(guó)公權(quán)與私權(quán)的和諧[J];西南石油大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年00期

5 郭發(fā)產(chǎn);;新《物業(yè)管理?xiàng)l例》貫徹實(shí)施物權(quán)法的幾個(gè)特點(diǎn)[J];上海房地;2008年03期

6 黃建文;;城市住宅小區(qū)的業(yè)主自治與政府介入[J];學(xué)術(shù)界;2011年04期

7 張慶東;;從本案看房屋維修資金管理及使用權(quán)歸屬[J];現(xiàn)代物業(yè);2008年01期

8 張靜;;培育城市公共空間的社會(huì)基礎(chǔ)——以一起上海社區(qū)糾紛案為例[J];上海政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年02期

9 張芳;公權(quán)與私權(quán)的博弈:行政許可設(shè)定的法哲學(xué)思考[J];政法論叢;2004年04期

本文編號(hào)：1570438