國際財(cái)務(wù)報(bào)告準(zhǔn)則動(dòng)態(tài)追蹤及對我國保險(xiǎn)業(yè)影響初探
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the rapid development of our country's economy, risk prevention and control has been paid more and more attention by the management of enterprises, and the improvement of people's living standard has brought about the change of wealth management concept and the enhancement of their own awareness of risk prevention. Under this background, as one of the effective ways of risk management system, China's insurance industry is developing rapidly, and the steady operation and efficient development of the insurance industry is related to the harmony and stability of the whole economic system and even the society. Under the trend of economic globalization, the degree of internationalization of China's insurance industry is also increasing, and several major insurance companies have been listed in Hong Kong and the United States one after another. However, the different accounting systems in different regions make the financial reports of listed companies deviate, mismatch and even conflict. The financial reports of insurance companies are complicated and difficult to understand. The differentiated accounting system greatly reduces the accuracy and practicability of financial reports. Regulators and other financial reporting users are having trouble. In 2009, the Ministry of Finance issued regulations on Accounting for Insurance contracts, which have improved the differences in the implementation of financial reports of A-H listed insurance companies. It brings about the change of accounting treatment method of insurance company and the change of insurance accounting theory, which will have an important influence on the future operation of insurance company. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the similarities and differences between China's insurance accounting standards and international financial reporting standards, and through empirical research on the impact on the operation of insurance companies. It provides some suggestions for the future operation of insurance companies and the construction of accounting system so as to contribute to the better and faster development of insurance enterprises in China. On the basis of the study of the previous discussion papers, soliciting opinions and related documents of IFRS4, this paper compares and analyzes the similarities and differences between IFRS4 and China's insurance accounting standards according to accounting theory, and analyzes the differences and similarities between IFRS4 and our country's insurance accounting standards by using the financial data of insurance companies, and analyzes the changes before and after the reform of accounting standards. Insurance companies in product, investment, financing and other aspects of change. This article will use the fictitious variable method, the empirical research IFRS4 to our country insurance company management influence, and then unifies the accounting practice to carry on the analysis to this, thus provides the constructive conclusion opinion. The main points of this paper are as follows: first, China's insurance accounting and international financial reporting standards have achieved substantial convergence, but China's insurance accounting on the basis of asset-liability method to take into account the deferred matching method, and in insurance contracts split, Major insurance risk testing methods and reserve measurement methods are still different from the provisions of the International Financial reporting Standards, and need to be further converged. Second, the international convergence of insurance accounting in China leads to insurance products, In particular, structural changes in life insurance products are conducive to the return of insurance to the essential function of risk protection. Thirdly, the international convergence of insurance accounting in China eliminates the differences in the financial statements of A-H listed insurance companies. It improves the transparency of financial reports and the quality of cross-level information, indirectly reduces the cost of information, and boosts overseas financing of insurance companies. Fourthly, the new accounting regulations release the excess reserves of insurance companies and enhance the operating performance and profitability of insurance companies. But at the same time, the ability of asset management of life insurance companies is tested. Therefore, the insurance companies should improve the efficiency of capital use and their own management level, construct an effective risk management and control system, and ensure that in the process of internationalization, To achieve steady and rapid development.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:復(fù)旦大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2014
【分類號】:F842;F840.4
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 勇小芹;;保險(xiǎn)合同會(huì)計(jì)研究的進(jìn)展、問題及啟示[J];西部財(cái)會(huì);2011年09期
2 張萍;;保險(xiǎn)合同準(zhǔn)備金計(jì)量問題與對策[J];當(dāng)代經(jīng)濟(jì);2012年16期
3 ;保險(xiǎn)合同現(xiàn)爭議 四種解決方式供消費(fèi)者選擇[J];現(xiàn)代物業(yè)(中旬刊);2012年10期
4 姚國卿;;受群眾歡迎的種羊醫(yī)療保險(xiǎn)合同[J];中國農(nóng)墾;1982年07期
5 魏華林;論保險(xiǎn)合同形式的幾個(gè)理論問題[J];保險(xiǎn)研究;1996年05期
6 鄭士貴;你經(jīng)受不住[J];管理科學(xué)文摘;1996年10期
7 周永波;醫(yī)療保險(xiǎn)合同的作用[J];中國社會(huì)保險(xiǎn);1997年06期
8 劉登勇;該理賠申請能否給付?──兼談保險(xiǎn)合同的效力[J];上海保險(xiǎn);2000年03期
9 偶見;本案保險(xiǎn)合同應(yīng)予解除[J];上海保險(xiǎn);2000年10期
10 李淑春;醫(yī)療保險(xiǎn)合同[J];中國社會(huì)保障;2000年07期
相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前10條
1 劉丹;殷鎮(zhèn)鋒;;保險(xiǎn)合同“代簽名”現(xiàn)象及其治理[A];中國保險(xiǎn)學(xué)會(huì)第二屆學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)入選論文集(實(shí)務(wù)卷)[C];2010年
2 劉丹;周甲笑;;無效保險(xiǎn)合同研究[A];浙江省2012年保險(xiǎn)法學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文集[C];2012年
3 費(fèi)潔;;淺析預(yù)收保費(fèi)與保險(xiǎn)合同成立的關(guān)系[A];浙江省2011年保險(xiǎn)法學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文集[C];2011年
4 魏小燕;;論保險(xiǎn)合同的成立與生效[A];浙江省2011年保險(xiǎn)法學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文集[C];2011年
5 魏小燕;;保險(xiǎn)合同中特別約定條款的效力[A];浙江省2012年保險(xiǎn)法學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文集[C];2012年
6 蘇兆勇;;反思保險(xiǎn)合同的解釋規(guī)則[A];中國商法年刊(2007):和諧社會(huì)構(gòu)建中的商法建設(shè)[C];2007年
7 夏益國;;應(yīng)在我國保險(xiǎn)法律中增加保險(xiǎn)合同的撤銷[A];2007環(huán)渤海區(qū)域金融合作發(fā)展研討會(huì)論文集[C];2007年
8 虞嶸;;保費(fèi)的交付與保險(xiǎn)合同的生效[A];浙江省2011年保險(xiǎn)法學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文集[C];2011年
9 蔣丹;;試論無效的保險(xiǎn)合同制度[A];中國商法年刊(2007):和諧社會(huì)構(gòu)建中的商法建設(shè)[C];2007年
10 范萬兵;;無效保險(xiǎn)合同研究[A];浙江省2013年保險(xiǎn)法學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文集[C];2013年
相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條
1 柯研 編譯;保險(xiǎn)合同[N];中國財(cái)經(jīng)報(bào);2005年
2 堵春勇;讓保險(xiǎn)合同平易近人[N];中國證券報(bào);2004年
3 記者 陳天翔;保險(xiǎn)合同,,讓我讀懂你![N];國際金融報(bào);2004年
4 朱立毅;保險(xiǎn)合同何以遍藏“陷阱條款”?[N];新華每日電訊;2005年
5 北京市五環(huán)律師事務(wù)所 馮修華律師;保險(xiǎn)合同的諾成性質(zhì)與保險(xiǎn)合同的成立[N];中國保險(xiǎn)報(bào);2006年
6 沙銀華 張玉玲;未繳保費(fèi) 未出保單 保險(xiǎn)合同成立嗎[N];中國保險(xiǎn)報(bào);2006年
7 嚴(yán)劍漪;買車未索保險(xiǎn)合同 保險(xiǎn)免賠后果自擔(dān)[N];中國保險(xiǎn)報(bào);2007年
8 于海燕;保險(xiǎn)合同 看得明白才能賠得清楚[N];人民法院報(bào);2007年
9 德國卡爾斯魯厄大學(xué)保險(xiǎn)研究所許閑;世界各國保險(xiǎn)合同界定分歧大[N];中國保險(xiǎn)報(bào);2008年
10 楊守勇;保險(xiǎn)合同很“霸道”,投保索賠有“門道”[N];新華每日電訊;2008年
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前3條
1 陳百靈;保證保險(xiǎn)合同研究[D];對外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué);2005年
2 姜南;保險(xiǎn)合同法定解除制度研究[D];西南財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2008年
3 高定中;保險(xiǎn)合同最大善意性之研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2007年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條
1 鮑浩;論保險(xiǎn)合同條款的解釋[D];華東政法學(xué)院;2007年
2 黃宇宏;論章程自由的界限[D];中國政法大學(xué);2015年
3 鄧穎;卡式電子保單業(yè)務(wù)特殊法律問題研究[D];中國青年政治學(xué)院;2015年
4 宋筠;保險(xiǎn)人明確說明義務(wù)的案例分析[D];蘭州大學(xué);2015年
5 劉t
本文編號:2195518
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/jingjilunwen/bxjjlw/2195518.html