本文選題：人口老齡化　切入點(diǎn)：養(yǎng)老金　出處：《上海社會(huì)科學(xué)院》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：根據(jù)聯(lián)合國(guó)的預(yù)測(cè),人口老齡化的趨勢(shì)不再像以前那樣維持在穩(wěn)定的態(tài)勢(shì)。截至21世紀(jì)初,幾乎在任何國(guó)家,人口老齡化比例相當(dāng)嚴(yán)重,都增長(zhǎng)達(dá)兩到三個(gè)百分點(diǎn)(Jackson,2002)。尤其是在發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家,老年人群基本上占據(jù)了人數(shù)總量的15%。聯(lián)合國(guó)數(shù)據(jù)的預(yù)測(cè)表明,老年人數(shù)在全球占比截至2030年將預(yù)計(jì)接近25%,預(yù)期2050年,該數(shù)值將會(huì)增長(zhǎng)至30%(聯(lián)合國(guó),2013)。第六次人口普查顯示我國(guó)人口老齡化的趨勢(shì)進(jìn)一步加快。在全國(guó)人口快速老齡化的背景下,我國(guó)社會(huì)養(yǎng)老保險(xiǎn)收支失衡的問(wèn)題日益突出。政府有關(guān)部門(mén)希望通過(guò)延遲參保職工退休年齡的辦法來(lái)緩解養(yǎng)老金支付問(wèn)題。但是,絕大多數(shù)企業(yè)職工不贊成和不支持延遲退休年齡的政策意圖。其中的一個(gè)重要原因是,當(dāng)前的養(yǎng)老金計(jì)發(fā)辦法沒(méi)有為延遲退休年齡提供足夠的激勵(lì),反而可能存在反向激勵(lì)。本文對(duì)2011年中國(guó)健康和老年人養(yǎng)老追蹤調(diào)查(CHARLS)及2013年和2014年的跟蹤調(diào)查的1001份問(wèn)卷的相關(guān)數(shù)據(jù)分析表明,85%以上的男性職工和90%以上的女性職工沒(méi)有選擇延遲退休。男性職工的平均退休年齡為57.36歲,女性職工的平均退休年齡僅為50.34歲。本文利用養(yǎng)老金替代率水平與個(gè)人延遲退休的意愿進(jìn)行回歸,回歸結(jié)果顯示,個(gè)人延遲退休與養(yǎng)老金替代率在10%的顯著水平上呈現(xiàn)負(fù)相關(guān),當(dāng)引入職稱(chēng)變量之后,結(jié)果表現(xiàn)出1%以上的顯著負(fù)相關(guān)。而將因變量延遲退休替換為樣本真實(shí)退齡之后,結(jié)果顯示個(gè)人實(shí)際退出勞動(dòng)市場(chǎng)的年齡與養(yǎng)老金替代率并不相關(guān)。本文的實(shí)證研究分析表明,當(dāng)討論了其他控制變量的作用情況下,總體來(lái)說(shuō),勞動(dòng)者選擇延遲退休的養(yǎng)老金替代率將降低15.2%,其中,男職工的延遲退休與養(yǎng)老金替代率關(guān)系并不顯著,而女職工延遲退休會(huì)更大程度的降低替代率,這說(shuō)明如今基本養(yǎng)老金保障體系未能鼓勵(lì)職工延遲退休,反而具有使得退休者提早離職的收益激勵(lì)。結(jié)果反映延后退休并未切合勞動(dòng)人員個(gè)人意愿和決策,當(dāng)前實(shí)行的基本養(yǎng)老保障制度也未能實(shí)現(xiàn)鼓勵(lì)延后獲取養(yǎng)老金的年齡的目標(biāo),從而推遲退休政策也很難得到落實(shí)。
[Abstract]:According to United Nations projections, the trend of population ageing is no longer as stable as it used to be. By the beginning of the twenty-first century, the proportion of population ageing was quite serious in almost any country. Especially in developed countries, older people account for almost 15 percent of the total. According to United Nations data, the proportion of older people in the world is expected to be close to 25 by 2030, and it is expected to be close to 25 by 2050. The number will rise to 30. (the sixth census shows that the trend of population aging in our country has further accelerated. In the context of the rapid aging of the national population, The problem of imbalance in income and expenditure of social endowment insurance is becoming more and more serious in China. The government departments concerned hope to alleviate the problem of pension payment by delaying the retirement age of insured workers. The vast majority of corporate workers disagree with and do not support the policy intent to delay the retirement age. One important reason is that the current pension scheme does not provide sufficient incentives to delay the retirement age. On the contrary, there may be reverse incentives. The data analysis of 1001 questionnaires from China Health and Old-Age tracking Survey in 2011 and 2013 and 2014 shows that more than 85% of male workers and more than 90% of women are female. Sex workers did not choose to delay retirement. The average retirement age for male workers was 57.36 years. The average retirement age of female workers is only 50.34 years old. This paper uses the level of pension replacement rate and the willingness of individual to delay retirement. The regression results show that there is a negative correlation between individual delayed retirement and pension replacement rate at a significant level of 10%. When the title variable was introduced, the results showed a significant negative correlation of more than 1%. The results show that the age at which individuals actually withdraw from the labour market is not related to the pension replacement rate. The empirical analysis of this paper shows that, when the role of other control variables is discussed, generally speaking, The pension replacement rate of workers who choose to delay retirement will be reduced by 15.2s. among them, the relation between male workers' delayed retirement and pension replacement rate is not significant, but the female workers' delayed retirement will reduce the replacement rate to a greater extent. This shows that today's basic pension system does not encourage workers to delay retirement, but instead provides an incentive for retirees to leave early. The result reflects that the delay in retirement is not in line with the individual wishes and decisions of workers. The current basic old-age pension system has also failed to meet the goal of encouraging delays in the age at which pensions are received, making it difficult to implement the policy of postponing retirement.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：上海社會(huì)科學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：F842.67

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 房連泉;齊傳鈞;孫永勇;田青;張盈華;高慶波;;社會(huì)保險(xiǎn)的“福利化”傾向隱憂(yōu)[J];中國(guó)社會(huì)保障;2013年08期

2 陽(yáng)義南;;基本養(yǎng)老保險(xiǎn)制度激勵(lì)提前退休的實(shí)證研究[J];財(cái)貿(mào)研究;2013年03期

3 袁中美;;延遲退休與養(yǎng)老金替代率的探討[J];人口與經(jīng)濟(jì);2013年01期

4 彭浩然;;基本養(yǎng)老保險(xiǎn)制度對(duì)個(gè)人退休行為的激勵(lì)程度研究[J];統(tǒng)計(jì)研究;2012年09期

5 張現(xiàn)同;郝勇;王珊珊;;新制度下基本養(yǎng)老保險(xiǎn)養(yǎng)老金替代率測(cè)算[J];統(tǒng)計(jì)與決策;2010年05期

6 楊勝利;李正龍;;統(tǒng)賬結(jié)合模式下養(yǎng)老金的替代率及多支柱模式研究[J];勞動(dòng)保障世界;2009年08期

7 鄧大松;李琳;;中國(guó)社會(huì)養(yǎng)老保險(xiǎn)的替代率及其敏感性分析[J];武漢大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年01期

8 鄭秉文;牟兵;;養(yǎng)老金調(diào)待機(jī)制存在的問(wèn)題與建議——基于2008年養(yǎng)老金上調(diào)的案例分析[J];宏觀(guān)經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2009年01期

9 寧鐘;王宇;;中國(guó)養(yǎng)老基金的投資監(jiān)管模式與OECD國(guó)家的比較研究[J];世界經(jīng)濟(jì)文匯;2007年05期

10 唐運(yùn)舒;;“做實(shí)做小”個(gè)人賬戶(hù)對(duì)個(gè)人養(yǎng)老金水平的影響[J];統(tǒng)計(jì)研究;2007年05期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 郝勇;養(yǎng)老金替代率適度水平的確定研究[D];中國(guó)礦業(yè)大學(xué);2012年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 賈瑞雪;我國(guó)企業(yè)員工養(yǎng)老金替代率的研究[D];北京交通大學(xué);2014年

2 黃萬(wàn)丁;養(yǎng)老金替代率水平評(píng)估與優(yōu)化[D];上海工程技術(shù)大學(xué);2014年

，

本文編號(hào)：1659787