本文選題：高職院校 + 科研評(píng)價(jià)��； 參考：《教育與職業(yè)》2017年11期

【摘要】：目前,職業(yè)教育科研評(píng)價(jià)方式存在著評(píng)價(jià)方式單一、重?cái)?shù)量輕質(zhì)量、評(píng)價(jià)目標(biāo)模糊、評(píng)價(jià)重心迷失等諸多缺位和錯(cuò)位問(wèn)題,評(píng)價(jià)結(jié)果難以有效反映職業(yè)教育科研的應(yīng)用價(jià)值并全面衡量教師的科研素質(zhì)與績(jī)效。因此,高職院校應(yīng)結(jié)合自身應(yīng)用型科研定位,明確評(píng)價(jià)導(dǎo)向,運(yùn)用多元化職業(yè)教育科研評(píng)價(jià)方式,構(gòu)建特色化職業(yè)教育科研評(píng)價(jià)方式標(biāo)準(zhǔn)體系,確定職業(yè)教育科研評(píng)價(jià)方式的重心,加快改進(jìn)教育教學(xué)理念、模式、方式,全面提升教育教學(xué)質(zhì)量。
[Abstract]:At present, there are many vacancy and dislocation problems in the evaluation of vocational education and scientific research, such as the single evaluation mode, the emphasis on quantity and quality, the vague evaluation goal, the loss of evaluation center of gravity, and so on. The evaluation results can not effectively reflect the applied value of scientific research in vocational education and comprehensively measure teachers' scientific research quality and performance. Therefore, higher vocational colleges should combine their own applied scientific research orientation, make clear the evaluation direction, use the diversified evaluation methods of vocational education scientific research, and construct the standard system of the characteristic vocational education scientific research evaluation mode. The emphasis of evaluation of scientific research in vocational education should be determined to speed up the improvement of educational and teaching concepts, models and methods, and to improve the quality of education and teaching in an all-round way.
【作者單位】： 天津商務(wù)職業(yè)學(xué)院科研處;
【基金】：2016年天津市教育科學(xué)“十三五”規(guī)劃課題“基于高職發(fā)展新常態(tài)下的職業(yè)教育科研評(píng)價(jià)創(chuàng)新研究”的階段性研究成果。(項(xiàng)目編號(hào):VE3165)
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：G717

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 李杰;;論職業(yè)教育科研評(píng)價(jià)的異化與復(fù)歸[J];科教導(dǎo)刊(上旬刊);2013年08期

，

本文編號(hào)：2055775