本文選題：專業(yè)史家 + “四史”運動��； 參考：《當代中國史研究》2012年04期

【摘要】："四史"運動具有與現(xiàn)代史學思潮相契合的一些基本理念,但由于過于強調(diào)政治目的,因而在實踐中滋生亂象。專業(yè)史家著力挖掘、闡發(fā)編寫"四史"對于史學研究的正面因素,試圖對"四史"的編纂體例提出規(guī)范性意見,將其引入真正意義的"歷史"編纂軌道,并在研究、編寫"四史"方面做了積極探討。但是,專業(yè)史家在"四史"運動中并未能扮演主角,他們從學術角度著眼的理性思考在當時也未能得到廣泛應和。總體而論,專業(yè)史家雖大多衷心服膺"寫人民群眾的歷史"這一取向,也曾付出了相當大的努力,卻無力影響"四史"運動的方向,也難有更大作為。
[Abstract]:The Movement of "four History" has some basic ideas which are in accord with the trend of thought in modern historiography, but because of its too much emphasis on political purpose, it breeds chaos in practice. Professional historians make great efforts to excavate and elucidate the positive factors of compiling "four History" for the study of historiography, and try to put forward normative opinions on the compilation style of "four History", and introduce it into the "historical" compilation track of real meaning, and study it. Active discussion was made on the writing of the four History. However, the professional historians failed to play the leading role in the "four History" movement, and their rational thinking from an academic point of view was not widely accepted at that time. Generally speaking, although most professional historians sincerely accept the orientation of "writing the history of the people," they have also made considerable efforts, but they are unable to influence the direction of the "four History" movement, and can hardly do more.
【作者單位】： 中國社會科學院近代史研究所;
【分類號】：K092

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 布魯斯·Ｍ·斯蒂文;中國口述史學的調(diào)查[J];當代中國史研究;1998年01期

2 王學典;近五十年的中國歷史學[J];歷史研究;2004年01期

3 邵循正;蘇述;;關于編寫村史的幾個問題——讀《北京四史叢書》后所想到的[J];歷史教學;1965年05期

4 張允侯;;苦難的歲月——一個婦女對舊社會的血淚控，

本文編號：1895029