本文選題：大學(xué)生 + 生存理由��； 參考：《中南大學(xué)》2012年博士論文

【摘要】：目的：(1)修訂生存理由量表,建立生存理由量表的中文版,并檢驗其在國內(nèi)大學(xué)生中的信效度；(2)了解國內(nèi)大學(xué)生生存理由及其對自殺意念的影響,找到有效促進大學(xué)生自殺防控的關(guān)鍵方法。 方法：(1)中文版生存理由量表在國內(nèi)大學(xué)生中的信效度研究由湖南省某六所高校共2166名大學(xué)生參與完成。4周后,140名大學(xué)生參加了重測。信度檢驗采用Cronbach's α系數(shù)、條目與分量表分相關(guān)和重測信度。效度檢驗包括結(jié)構(gòu)效度(探索性因素分析、驗證性因素分析及分量表分相關(guān))和內(nèi)容效度(聚合效度及區(qū)分效度)。(2)隨后的研究由湖南某六所高校2951名大學(xué)生參與完成。所用統(tǒng)計方法：描述性統(tǒng)計、t檢驗、F檢驗、回歸分析。 結(jié)果：(1)中文版生存理由量表總量表Cronbach'sα系數(shù)為0.94；各因子α系數(shù)在0.74-0.94之間；總量表的重測信度為0.75,各因子重測信度在0.65-0.87；條目與相應(yīng)的因子相關(guān)系數(shù)在0.67-0.93之間。驗證性因子分析的指標(biāo)均達到測量學(xué)要求。區(qū)分效度和聚合效度滿意。(2)大學(xué)生樣本在SCB、RFF、CRC維度上的得分較高。(3)生存理由的年級主效應(yīng)不顯著,大學(xué)生生存理由的年級與專業(yè)類型、學(xué)習(xí)情況、專業(yè)喜歡程度、有無宗教信仰、性別、生源地變量的交互作用顯著。(4)在不同的家庭環(huán)境中成長的大學(xué)生生存理由有顯著差異。遭遇了親友自殺、危及生命的自然災(zāi)害的個體生存理由分均顯著低于沒有遭遇過這些經(jīng)歷的樣本組。家庭環(huán)境量表高分組與低分組樣本之間生存理由有顯著差異。(5)EPQ人格問卷E、N、P因子分高分組、生活事件高分組的RFL-C總分、SCB、RFF、CRC維度分均顯著低于其低分組,而FS、FSD、MO維度分顯著高于后者。SCL-90量表陽性癥狀組SCB維度分都顯著比陰性癥狀組得分低。(6)神經(jīng)質(zhì)因子、精神質(zhì)因子、內(nèi)向-外向因子,強迫因子、焦慮因子、軀體化因子,家庭環(huán)境如對家庭的喜歡程度、家庭結(jié)構(gòu)、家庭經(jīng)濟狀況及家庭的親密度、情感表達、文化性、娛樂性因子,負性生活事件如學(xué)習(xí)壓力、親人中的自殺、人際關(guān)系事件、喪失事件、其他重大生活事件,年級變量、生源地變量、性別變量對生存理由低分有不同程度的預(yù)測作用。(7)生存理由總量表及SCB、RFF、CRC、 FSD、MO分量表在壓力性生活事件與大學(xué)生自殺意念關(guān)系之間存在補償效應(yīng)；生存理由總量表、SCB、RFF、CRC、FS分量表分在壓力性生活事件與大學(xué)生自殺意念之間起著部分中介作用；壓力性生活事件與生存理由(生存理由總量表,SCB、RFF、CRC、FSD)的調(diào)節(jié)項對大學(xué)生自殺意念的預(yù)測作用顯著。 結(jié)論：(1)中文版生存理由量表在大學(xué)生中存在良好的信效度；(2)不同專業(yè)、不同性別、不同生源地、有無宗教信仰、對專業(yè)喜歡程度不同的大學(xué)生樣本的生存理由表述呈現(xiàn)年級差異；不同家庭環(huán)境、是否遭遇壓力性生活事件、不同個性特點、不同心理健康狀態(tài)的樣本其生存理由表述不同；心理健康狀況、家庭環(huán)境、壓力性生活事件及生源地、性別、年級變量對大學(xué)生生存理由存在不同程度的影響。(3)生存理由可以在一定程度上抵消壓力性生活事件對大學(xué)生自殺意念的不利影響,起到風(fēng)險補償效應(yīng)。壓力性生活事件既直接作用于大學(xué)生自殺意念,又通過生存理由能產(chǎn)生間接作用；生存理由可以緩沖壓力性生活事件對大學(xué)生自殺意念的促進作用。增強學(xué)生的內(nèi)在生存信念,提高學(xué)生在自殺預(yù)防中的主動性是大學(xué)生自殺意念有效防控的重要而關(guān)鍵的方法。
[Abstract]:Objective: (1) to revise the survival reason scale, establish the Chinese version of the survival reason scale, and test its reliability and validity in the domestic college students; (2) to understand the reasons for the survival of the domestic college students and their influence on suicide ideation, and to find the key method to effectively promote the prevention and control of College Students' suicide.
Methods: (1) the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the subsistence scale was studied by 2166 college students in six universities in Hunan province. After.4 weeks, 140 college students participated in the retest. The reliability test adopted the Cronbach's alpha coefficient, the item and the subscale correlation and retest reliability. The validity test included the structural validity (exploration). Factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis and subscale correlation) and content validity (aggregation validity and discriminative validity). (2) the subsequent study was completed by 2951 college students from six universities in Hunan. Statistical methods were used: descriptive statistics, t test, F test, and regression analysis.
Results: (1) the Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the Chinese version of the survival reason scale was 0.94, the factor alpha coefficient was between 0.74-0.94, the retest reliability of the total scale was 0.75, the retest reliability of each factor was 0.65-0.87, and the correlation coefficient between the items and the corresponding factors was between 0.67-0.93. The validity and the aggregation validity were satisfactory. (2) the students' scores on the SCB, RFF, and CRC dimensions were higher. (3) the main effect of the grade of survival was not significant. The grade and professional type of the college students' survival reasons, the learning situation, the degree of professional preference, the interaction of the religious belief, sex, and the source of origin were significant. (4) in different family environment. There were significant differences in survival reasons for the growing college students. The individual survival reasons of the natural disasters that suffered from relatives and friends and the natural disasters endangering life were significantly lower than those who had not experienced these experiences. There were significant differences in the survival reasons between the high group and the low group. (5) the EPQ personality questionnaire E, N, and P factors were divided into high groups. The scores of RFL-C, SCB, RFF, and CRC were significantly lower than those of low groups, while FS, FSD, MO dimension scores were significantly higher than those of the latter.SCL-90 scale. (6) neuroticism, psychotic factor, introvert extrovert, obsessive factor, anxiety factor, somatization factor, family A court environment, such as the degree of family preference, family structure, family economic status and family intimacy, emotional expression, culture, recreational factors, negative life events such as learning pressure, suicide in the family, interpersonal events, loss events, other major life events, grade variables, origin variables, and sex variables are low on the reasons for survival. (7) the total list of survival reasons and SCB, RFF, CRC, FSD, MO subscales have compensatory effects between the stressful life events and the suicidal ideation of college students; the total list of reasons for survival, SCB, RFF, CRC, and FS components are partially mediating between the stressful life events and the suicidal ideation of college students. The regulatory items of stressful life events and survival reasons (survival scale, SCB, RFF, CRC, FSD) have significant predictive effects on College Students' suicidal ideation.
Conclusion: (1) the Chinese version of the survival reason scale has good reliability and validity in college students; (2) different majors, different sexes, different sources of life, and there are no religious beliefs, presenting grade differences to the survival reasons of college students with different professional levels of life; different family environments, stressful life events, different personalities Characteristics, different psychological state of the sample of their survival reasons are different, psychological health status, family environment, stressful life events and birthplaces, sex, grade variables have different degrees of influence on College Students' survival reasons. (3) survival reasons can counteract the suicidal ideation of stressful life events to college students in a certain range. The adverse effects, which play a direct role in college students' suicide ideation, have an indirect effect on survival reasons, and the survival reasons can cushion the promotion of College Students' suicidal ideation by stressful life events, enhance students' belief in survival and improve students' suicide prevention. Initiative is an important and key method for effective prevention and control of suicide ideation among college students.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：中南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：G444;G645.5

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳曉霞;彭鵬;;自殺危險因素的研究現(xiàn)狀[J];重慶醫(yī)學(xué);2010年01期

2 程敬文;陳凱;郭鐵軍;溫紅輝;;廣州市2~12歲兒童睡眠障礙流行病學(xué)調(diào)查[J];中國兒童保健雜志;2006年04期

3 劉宜紅;童建福;;大學(xué)生自殺危機干預(yù)機制探討[J];福建論壇(人文社會科學(xué)版);2005年11期

4 于情,王禮桂;大學(xué)生自殺問題研究進展[J];國外醫(yī)學(xué)(社會醫(yī)學(xué)分冊);2004年04期

5 李智;;從生命意識缺失現(xiàn)象談大學(xué)生“三生教育”[J];湖北經(jīng)濟學(xué)院學(xué)報(人文社會科學(xué)版);2011年11期

6 王穎軼;;如何培養(yǎng)當(dāng)代大學(xué)生英語學(xué)習(xí)興趣與動力的思考[J];黑龍江科技信息;2008年20期

7 程婧;孟莉;;近十年國內(nèi)大學(xué)生心理危機干預(yù)研究述評[J];河北理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2011年03期

8 孟慶恩;大學(xué)生自殺問題與危機干預(yù)的研究[J];健康心理學(xué)雜志;2001年06期

9 周忠琴;姜潮;;大學(xué)生自殺意念影響因素研究概況[J];中國健康心理學(xué)雜志;2007年05期

10 裴利華;;積極心理輔導(dǎo)綜合模式對大學(xué)生心理健康的影響[J];中國健康心理學(xué)雜志;2009年01期

，

本文編號：1804887