本文關(guān)鍵詞：中美高校德育教育差異性研究　出處：《杭州電子科技大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 德育教育 中美高校 差異性

【摘要】：高校德育工作在我國歷來受到高度重視。在新的時代背景下，如何更進(jìn)一步的做好我國高校德育工作，使青年學(xué)生朝著更加積極健康的方向發(fā)展，努力培養(yǎng)符合社會主義現(xiàn)代化建設(shè)的復(fù)合型人才，是一個迫切需要解決的問題。由于歷史文化傳統(tǒng)與社會制度的差異，中美兩國高校的德育教育存在著明顯差異，對高校德育目標(biāo)、內(nèi)容、實施途徑等的闡述不盡相同。但隨著經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化的不斷加強，信息化程度越來越高，國與國之間的聯(lián)系日益緊密，逐漸呈現(xiàn)出相互借鑒、相互學(xué)習(xí)的趨勢。在高校德育的工作問題上，中美兩國都在不斷地探索研究，試圖在不同的文化氛圍與歷史背景下，努力找到一條適合于本國發(fā)展的德育創(chuàng)新之路。我國高校德育以馬克思主義基本理論為主導(dǎo)，德育內(nèi)容呈現(xiàn)出整體性、理論性與系統(tǒng)性的特點，層次性相對缺乏；課堂灌輸式教育是德育實施的一個主要途徑，十分強調(diào)理論學(xué)習(xí)，課程稍顯乏味，，實踐作用并不突出。美國高校德育十分強調(diào)個人的價值，德育目標(biāo)并未在政治上有突出表現(xiàn)；德育內(nèi)容較我國更具體生動、接近生活，尤其重視歷史教育，宗教教育滲透其中；德育實施采取價值分析等方法，效果顯著。文章以中美高校德育比較研究為切入點，通過對中美高校德育目標(biāo)、德育內(nèi)容、德育實施途徑的比較研究，對我國高校德育建設(shè)提出了五個方面的建議：一是加強愛國主義教育，使大學(xué)生熱愛祖國，時刻堅定愛黨、愛國信念，形成強烈的民族自尊心與自豪感；二是加強中華傳統(tǒng)道德教育，借鑒世界先進(jìn)文化成果；三是完善德育課程的設(shè)立，使德育教育與其他方面的教育牢牢結(jié)合，在對其他學(xué)科進(jìn)行教育的同時不斷滲透德育教育，提高時效性；四是德育與社會實踐相結(jié)合，使學(xué)生通過參加社會實踐活動培養(yǎng)自己獨立生活的意識，自立、自強、自信；五是將學(xué)生的主體性與德育教育相結(jié)合，在德育教育中積極發(fā)揮他們的長處與優(yōu)勢，廢除過去不科學(xué)的教育模式，努力健全大學(xué)生人格，實現(xiàn)大學(xué)生人格現(xiàn)代化。 本文的第一章主要一些基本知識的介紹，包括選題緣由以及研究的重要意義等，并結(jié)合實際闡述了研究目的、意義及方法。接下來運用對比分析等研究方法分別就中國和美國高校各自在德育工作中所面臨的主要問題進(jìn)行了較為深刻的分析，取其精華、去其糟粕、兼收并蓄、為我所用。第三章主要分為三個部分來進(jìn)行闡述，也是文章的核心內(nèi)容，分別就中國和美國高校在德育內(nèi)容、方法與實施途徑問題上展開論述，尋找其差異性，為我國高校德育的完善鋪平道路。本文的第四章為文章的難點，從理論基礎(chǔ)、價值取向、政策導(dǎo)向入手，對存在差異性的具體原因進(jìn)行了深刻分析。第五章就如何完善我國高校德育，并結(jié)合我國實際，提出了具體策略。
[Abstract]:The moral education in Colleges and universities has received great attention in our country. Under the background of new era, how to further improve our moral education in Colleges and universities, the young students towards a more active and healthy direction, to cultivate talents for the socialist modernization, is an urgent problem to be solved. Due to differences in history the cultural tradition and social system, there are significant differences of moral education between Chinese and American universities, the content of moral education goals, implementation approaches, this is not the same. But along with the globalization of economy growing, increasingly high degree of information technology, relations between nations have become increasingly close, gradually showing each other learn from each other. In the trend of college moral education work, the two countries are constantly trying to explore, in the cultural atmosphere and different historical context, trying to find a Suitable for their own development path. The innovation of moral education moral education in Universities Based on the basic theory of Marx doctrine is dominant, the content of moral education show a comprehensive and systematic theory, characteristics, the relative lack of hierarchy; classroom education is a main way of moral education, emphasizes the theory of learning, curriculum slightly boring, practical effect is not prominent. The American college moral education emphasizes the value of the individual, the goal of moral education does not have outstanding performance in politics; the content of moral education in our country is more vivid and close to life, with particular emphasis on history education, the penetration of religious education; moral education take the value analysis method, the effect is significant. The university moral education between China and America a comparative study on Sino US as the breakthrough point, through the goal of moral education, moral education, comparative study of moral education way, on construction of moral education in Colleges and universities in China put forward five aspects Suggestions: one is to strengthen the patriotic education, to enable students to love the motherland, love the party always firmly, patriotic faith, forming strong sense of national pride and pride; the two is to strengthen the Chinese traditional moral education, learn from the advanced cultural achievements of the world; the three is to improve the establishment of moral education, the moral education and other aspects of education firmly with the continuous infiltration of moral education in the education of other subjects at the same time, improve the timeliness; four is the moral education and social practice, to make the students to participate in social practice to develop their own sense of independence, self-reliance, self-reliance, self-confidence; the five is to combine the students' subjectivity and moral education, actively play the strengths with their advantages in the moral education, the abolition of the past does not scientific mode of education, efforts to improve the college students' personality, realize the modernization of College Students' personality.
The first chapter mainly introduces some basic knowledge, including the reason of the topic and the research significance, and expatiates on the research purpose, significance and method. Then by using the method of comparative analysis, analyzes deeply the main problems faced by their China and American universities in the moral education work, take its essence, to its dregs, eclectic, as I used to. The third chapter is divided into three parts to elaborate, but also the core content of the article, respectively Chinese and American universities in the content of moral education, discusses the problems and ways of implementation, find the difference, paving the way for the improvement of the moral education in colleges and universities in China in this paper. The fourth chapter is the difficulty of this article from the theoretical basis, value orientation, policy orientation, with the specific reasons for the differences have been deeply analyzed. The fifth chapter is about how to perfect The moral education in Colleges and universities in our country, and combined with the reality of our country, put forward specific strategies.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：杭州電子科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：G641

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王冬樺;東西方道德教育比較研究[J];比較教育研究;1996年04期

2 陳俊珂;美國大學(xué)德育的途徑與方法[J];比較教育研究;1999年01期

3 宇小兵;美國高校德育的幾個特征[J];桂海論叢;1998年03期

4 張勤,李俊;我國中美思想政治教育比較研究的三個發(fā)展階段[J];思想理論教育導(dǎo)刊;2005年02期

5 張敏;朱平;姚本先;;中美高校思想政治教育差異性探究[J];航海教育研究;2008年03期

6 葉芳云;中美學(xué)校道德教育內(nèi)容比較及啟示[J];海南師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(人文社會科學(xué)版);2001年03期

7 黎平,王宇;高校德育視野中的“以人為本”——美國高校德育觀念分析及啟示[J];現(xiàn)代教育科學(xué);2005年03期

8 張應(yīng)強;中美大學(xué)德育之比較[J];江蘇高教;1994年03期

9 鄭德全;;美國學(xué)校思想政治教育及其對中國的啟示[J];江蘇教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2006年01期

10 周兆龍;中美高校學(xué)生德育途徑比較初探[J];江西社會科學(xué);2002年12期

本文編號：1427384