大學(xué)到課率及其影響因素與對(duì)策研究
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of higher education and the expansion of the scale of higher education in our country, the situation and improvement of the quality of university education are generally concerned by the government, society, teachers, students and parents, and there are many factors that affect the quality of university teaching. One of the important factors is the college-to-class rate, so to improve the quality of college teaching, we must pay attention to the college-to-class rate. The so-called college-to-class rate refers to the ratio of the actual number of students to the number of students who should come to class in classroom teaching. It not only reflects the situation of students coming to class, but also comprehensively reflects the state of study of college students, especially the style of study. Reflects the teaching situation and the teaching management condition of the university. It is of great significance for colleges and universities to take measures to improve students' study, teachers' teaching and school teaching management to improve the teaching rate and teaching quality. On the basis of comparing and analyzing the existing research results, this paper makes a comprehensive and systematic study on the present situation of the college to class rate by using the empirical research methods such as spot check, class listening, investigation, teaching inspection materials and so on. The empirical study shows that the classroom to class rate of 67 colleges is 79.81 in the fall semester of 2012, and that of 2141 students in 20 colleges is 89 in spring 2013. There are differences between different colleges, different grades and different genders. Students, teachers, schools, and social factors affect the class rate. In particular, some students do not have a clear purpose of learning, do not like their major, lack a good comprehensive quality and a good learning mentality, and their teaching level is not very high. The teaching content is not very rich, the teaching method is not very reasonable, the teaching responsibility is not strong, the school does not attach great importance to the teaching, the curriculum is not very reasonable, the teaching management is not very strict, the teaching environment is not very good, and the current education system has some drawbacks. The negative impact of the network, the grim employment situation. The national education policy, the theory of total quality management and the utilization of university resources provide the feasibility for improving the class rate. To improve the college-to-class rate, we can take countermeasures from four aspects: students, teachers, schools and society. Students should make clear the purpose of study, cultivate enthusiasm for professional study, improve self-management ability, face the pressure correctly, teachers should improve teaching level, enrich teaching content, improve teaching method, strengthen teaching responsibility, and school should stress teaching center. The society should deepen the reform of educational system, optimize the network environment, and increase the guidance of employment by optimizing the curriculum, strengthening the management of teaching quality, perfecting the method of examination, and strengthening the construction of campus culture. Only in this way can we fully arouse the enthusiasm of students to study, improve the participation of students in teaching activities, reduce students' skipping classes, improve the rate of students to class, and achieve the goal of talent training in colleges and universities.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:湖南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2013
【分類號(hào)】:G642
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 朱書玉;;高校大學(xué)生逃課現(xiàn)象產(chǎn)生原因與應(yīng)對(duì)策略[J];出國(guó)與就業(yè)(就業(yè)版);2011年10期
2 徐長(zhǎng)斌;謝紅燕;;大學(xué)生“到課問(wèn)題”四論[J];重慶科技學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年06期
3 陳富;易朝紅;;高校學(xué)生到課率及課堂參與度調(diào)查研究——基于對(duì)江西某高校的調(diào)查[J];大學(xué)(學(xué)術(shù)版);2011年01期
4 邢紅;;“以生為本”與提高成人高等教育學(xué)生到課率探討[J];高等函授學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年03期
5 韓永廷;;如何提高函授課的面授到課率[J];探索者學(xué)刊;1998年04期
6 班宏;從函授生面授到課率狀況談成人教育改革[J];高等農(nóng)業(yè)教育;1999年08期
7 張守莉;宋卓;;關(guān)于大學(xué)生逃課問(wèn)題的研究及對(duì)策——以吉林農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)為例[J];繼續(xù)教育研究;2010年10期
8 李波;;PDCA循環(huán)理論在高校教學(xué)質(zhì)量管理體系中的應(yīng)用[J];現(xiàn)代教育科學(xué);2010年05期
9 莊瑋;陽(yáng)榮威;;高等教育服務(wù)視角下大學(xué)生逃課行為分析[J];江蘇高教;2008年06期
10 金榮標(biāo);;電大開(kāi)放教育到課率低現(xiàn)象及對(duì)策研究[J];當(dāng)代教育論壇(管理版);2010年02期
本文編號(hào):2415864
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/jiaoyulunwen/shifanjiaoyulunwen/2415864.html