【摘要】：在當(dāng)今這個(gè)以人才為本的社會(huì),嚴(yán)峻的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)形勢(shì)把我們的目光不由自主地聚焦到當(dāng)代人才的教育上,而研究生的教育恰恰是目前階段教育的重中之重。高校中最要緊的任務(wù)是教學(xué),教學(xué)質(zhì)量是高校存在和持續(xù)的基礎(chǔ)。而教學(xué)的根本組成部分是課堂教學(xué),這也導(dǎo)致了目前許多學(xué)者都致力于提高教學(xué)質(zhì)量的研究上。同時(shí)引出了另一個(gè)急切的問(wèn)題：如何能夠讓我們的高等教育得到保證?高校教學(xué)質(zhì)量保障體系中的最根本的重點(diǎn)是學(xué)生評(píng)價(jià)課堂,它直接影響著高校培育學(xué)生的程度和質(zhì)量。學(xué)生對(duì)教師教學(xué)質(zhì)量的評(píng)價(jià)稱為學(xué)生評(píng)教,國(guó)外簡(jiǎn)稱學(xué)生評(píng)教為“SET”。作為高校教學(xué)質(zhì)量保障體系中舉足輕重的一項(xiàng)制度,學(xué)生評(píng)教是最能反映教師教學(xué)質(zhì)量高低的、最有成效的評(píng)價(jià)手段。而具有科學(xué)性和可操作性的評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系是影響學(xué)生評(píng)教順利進(jìn)行的關(guān)鍵要素,因此構(gòu)建符合學(xué)生水平的評(píng)教指標(biāo)體系是學(xué)生評(píng)教工作順利完成的先決條件。學(xué)生評(píng)教指標(biāo)體系如果缺乏科學(xué)性,評(píng)教的結(jié)果可能南轅北轍,嚴(yán)重挫傷教師的積極性。 本文最開(kāi)始分析了K校課堂教學(xué)質(zhì)量學(xué)生評(píng)教指標(biāo)體系的現(xiàn)狀,從目前K校學(xué)生評(píng)教指標(biāo)體系的不足之處入手,在當(dāng)前國(guó)內(nèi)外的研究理論的基礎(chǔ)上初步擬定出新的學(xué)生評(píng)教指標(biāo)體系。在設(shè)計(jì)調(diào)查問(wèn)卷的時(shí)候,運(yùn)用關(guān)鍵要素調(diào)查法選取K校130名普研學(xué)生,對(duì)其進(jìn)行問(wèn)卷發(fā)放和問(wèn)卷回收工作,經(jīng)過(guò)計(jì)算后,篩除得分低的指標(biāo),篩選出優(yōu)質(zhì)的學(xué)生評(píng)教指標(biāo),確定學(xué)生評(píng)教指標(biāo)體系。然后運(yùn)用層次分析法確定指標(biāo)權(quán)重,并結(jié)合之前所構(gòu)建的學(xué)生評(píng)教指標(biāo)體系設(shè)計(jì)教師教學(xué)質(zhì)量量化測(cè)評(píng)問(wèn)卷,對(duì)K校教師的課堂教學(xué)質(zhì)量通過(guò)模糊綜合評(píng)價(jià)法進(jìn)行評(píng)價(jià)。最終,結(jié)合上述內(nèi)容得出K校評(píng)教指標(biāo)體系的結(jié)論并對(duì)其提出展望。 本文是在研究K校目前的學(xué)生評(píng)教指標(biāo)體系的基礎(chǔ)上提出改進(jìn)意見(jiàn),在理論及實(shí)踐意義上都有一定的指導(dǎo)作用。在加強(qiáng)高校教學(xué)管理及推動(dòng)教學(xué)改革方面,有很大的示范作用；在推動(dòng)發(fā)展教師的教學(xué)技能、提高教學(xué)質(zhì)量方面,有積極的指導(dǎo)作用；在提高學(xué)生認(rèn)知評(píng)價(jià)和規(guī)范教學(xué)評(píng)價(jià)方面,有直接的教育意義。與此同時(shí),在前沿理論方面本研究也竭力爭(zhēng)取有所創(chuàng)新和延伸。
[Abstract]:In today's talent oriented society, the severe competition situation unavoidably focuses our attention on the education of contemporary talents, and the education of graduate students is the most important part of education at present stage. Teaching is the most important task in colleges and universities, and teaching quality is the foundation of its existence and continuity. The fundamental component of teaching is classroom teaching, which has led many scholars to improve the quality of teaching research. It also raises another pressing question: how can our higher education be guaranteed? The most fundamental emphasis of the guarantee system of teaching quality in colleges and universities is the classroom evaluation of students, which directly affects the degree and quality of cultivating students in colleges and universities. Students' evaluation of teachers' teaching quality is called students' evaluation of teaching, and foreign students' evaluation of teaching is called "SET". As an important system in the guarantee system of teaching quality in colleges and universities, students' evaluation of teaching is the most effective and effective means to reflect teachers' teaching quality. The scientific and operable evaluation index system is the key factor to affect the smooth progress of students' evaluation of teaching, so it is a prerequisite for the successful completion of students' evaluation of teaching to construct an index system of evaluation of teaching in accordance with the level of students. If the index system of students' evaluation of teaching is not scientific, the result of teaching evaluation may be diametrically opposite and seriously dampen the enthusiasm of teachers. This paper begins with the analysis of the present situation of the evaluation index system of K school students' teaching quality, starting with the deficiency of the present system of K school students' evaluation of teaching. On the basis of current domestic and foreign research theories, a new index system of students' evaluation of teaching is drawn up. In the design of the questionnaire, 130 students from K school were selected by the key factor survey method, and the questionnaire was distributed and recovered. After the calculation, the index of low score was sifted out, and the high quality students' evaluation index of teaching was screened out. Determine the index system of students' evaluation of teaching. Then using AHP to determine the weight of the index, combined with the previous student evaluation index system to design the quantitative evaluation questionnaire of teachers' teaching quality, and evaluate the classroom teaching quality of K school teachers by fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method. Finally, the conclusion of K school evaluation index system is obtained and the prospect is put forward. On the basis of studying the current evaluation index system of students in K school, this paper puts forward some suggestions for improvement, which has a certain guiding function in both theory and practice. It plays an important role in strengthening teaching management and promoting teaching reform in colleges and universities, promoting teachers' teaching skills and improving teaching quality. It has direct educational significance in improving students' cognitive evaluation and standardizing teaching evaluation. At the same time, this research also strives for innovation and extension in frontier theory.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：昆明理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：G642.0

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李巧林,鄭傳寧,王章豹;關(guān)于高校教學(xué)質(zhì)量管理與監(jiān)控體系建設(shè)的探析[J];合肥工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2001年03期

2 李亞?wèn)|,王孫禺;從兩種不同的評(píng)價(jià)觀看教學(xué)評(píng)估結(jié)果的公布[J];高等教育研究;2002年01期

3 魏紅,申繼亮;背景特征對(duì)學(xué)生評(píng)價(jià)教師教學(xué)的影響[J];高等教育研究;2003年04期

4 姚利民,鄧菊香;提高學(xué)生評(píng)教有效性之對(duì)策研究[J];黑龍江高教研究;2005年05期

5 安敏;于曉斐;;高校課堂教學(xué)質(zhì)量評(píng)價(jià)研究文獻(xiàn)定量分析[J];教學(xué)研究;2008年02期

6 王篤美;學(xué)生評(píng)教的有效性穩(wěn)定性分析[J];江蘇高教;1996年02期

7 張首芳;“教師教學(xué)質(zhì)量評(píng)價(jià)”新指標(biāo)體系的建立[J];煤炭高等教育;2003年05期

8 王秀明;陳明銳;;AHP層次分析法在高校師資隊(duì)伍綜合評(píng)價(jià)系統(tǒng)中的應(yīng)用[J];海南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2012年03期

9 胡逢早;課堂教學(xué)評(píng)價(jià)構(gòu)建初探[J];教育探索;2000年04期

10 薛偉,王春英;教師課堂教學(xué)評(píng)估實(shí)踐與探索[J];教育發(fā)展研究;2003年10期

，

本文編號(hào)：2368701