【摘要】：在知識(shí)經(jīng)濟(jì)時(shí)代,大學(xué)作為人才培養(yǎng)的基地已經(jīng)進(jìn)入到了社會(huì)的中心,影響著社會(huì)的經(jīng)濟(jì)、科技、政治、文化、軍事等諸方面。大學(xué)影響力的提升以及各國(guó)政府在政策、資金上對(duì)高等教育的支持,高等教育的規(guī)模迅速擴(kuò)大,大眾化、普及化的速度越來越快。面對(duì)如此局面,眾多學(xué)者對(duì)高等教育的質(zhì)量提出質(zhì)疑,而對(duì)課堂教學(xué)環(huán)境的研究也隨之變熱。以往的教育研究者們較為關(guān)注學(xué)生學(xué)習(xí)過程和教師的教學(xué)過程,側(cè)重于學(xué)生的內(nèi)在的心理素質(zhì)以及教師自身的教學(xué)能力,對(duì)教學(xué)環(huán)境的研究較少。近年來,學(xué)者們逐漸轉(zhuǎn)向?qū)W生的學(xué)習(xí)環(huán)境上,例如研究學(xué)習(xí)環(huán)境對(duì)學(xué)生的學(xué)習(xí)態(tài)度、行為表現(xiàn)和自我意識(shí)的形成有何影響等。盡管對(duì)教學(xué)環(huán)境研究視角紛多,但教學(xué)的最終目的是促進(jìn)學(xué)生的發(fā)展。因此,教學(xué)環(huán)境的相關(guān)研究也是服務(wù)于教師的教學(xué)和學(xué)生的學(xué)習(xí),并且對(duì)其效果的檢驗(yàn)最終止于學(xué)生個(gè)體的學(xué)業(yè)發(fā)展或個(gè)性的成熟等。本研究通過對(duì)東北師范大學(xué)公共政治課的個(gè)案研究,進(jìn)而管窺當(dāng)代高校思想政治公共課課堂教學(xué)環(huán)境的現(xiàn)狀及該課堂上大學(xué)生學(xué)習(xí)方式現(xiàn)狀,并探究高校公共政治課堂教學(xué)環(huán)境對(duì)大學(xué)生政治課學(xué)習(xí)方式有何影響。本研究運(yùn)用問卷調(diào)查了D大學(xué)公共政治課堂教學(xué)環(huán)境與學(xué)生學(xué)習(xí)方式的現(xiàn)狀,調(diào)查對(duì)象是2013級(jí)本科生,根據(jù)教師教學(xué)風(fēng)格以及整個(gè)課堂營(yíng)造的環(huán)境將公共政治課分為傳統(tǒng)型課堂和新型課堂。研究問題如下:1.傳統(tǒng)型公共政治課堂與新型公共政治課堂教學(xué)環(huán)境有何不同特征?2.傳統(tǒng)型公共政治課堂與新型公共政治課堂中,大學(xué)生學(xué)習(xí)方式有何差異?3.兩種不同類型(傳統(tǒng)型與新型)公共政治課堂教學(xué)環(huán)境對(duì)大學(xué)生政治課學(xué)習(xí)方式有何影響?研究發(fā)現(xiàn):(1)D大學(xué)本科生感知的公共政治課堂教學(xué)環(huán)境整體上處于良好狀態(tài),但是新型的政治課堂總體上要優(yōu)于傳統(tǒng)型課堂。(2)D大學(xué)本科生公共政治課表現(xiàn)出來的學(xué)習(xí)方式因課堂教學(xué)環(huán)境的差異,亦有所不同。具體表現(xiàn)為在高校新型的公共政治課中,大學(xué)生們對(duì)深層學(xué)習(xí)方式的評(píng)價(jià)相對(duì)要優(yōu)于表層方式;而在傳統(tǒng)型課堂中表層學(xué)習(xí)方式得分要高。(3)就公共政治課堂課堂教學(xué)環(huán)境與大學(xué)生政治課學(xué)習(xí)方式的關(guān)系而言,不管是新型的公共政治課堂,還是傳統(tǒng)的公共政治課堂教學(xué)環(huán)境中,政治課程的組織與實(shí)施、教師的評(píng)估與反饋與學(xué)生投入三個(gè)維度與學(xué)生的深層學(xué)習(xí)策略呈顯著正相關(guān),與大學(xué)生政治課學(xué)習(xí)動(dòng)機(jī)沒有顯著相關(guān)性,而學(xué)生政治課的投入程度與表層學(xué)習(xí)策略呈相關(guān)性。良好的大學(xué)公共政治課堂教學(xué)環(huán)境的營(yíng)造,有助于大學(xué)生深層學(xué)習(xí)方式的培養(yǎng),進(jìn)而促進(jìn)學(xué)生學(xué)習(xí)成就的提高。因此,高校公共政治課堂教學(xué)環(huán)境的改善是高等教育大眾化背景下,提高公共政治課堂教學(xué)質(zhì)量的一個(gè)重要突破口。
[Abstract]:In the era of knowledge economy, universities, as the base of talent training, have entered the center of society, which affects the economy, science and technology, politics, culture, military and so on. With the promotion of university influence and the support of governments to higher education in policies and funds, the scale of higher education is expanding rapidly, popularizing and popularizing. Faced with this situation, many scholars question the quality of higher education, and the study of classroom teaching environment also becomes hot. Previous educational researchers pay more attention to students' learning process and teachers' teaching process, focusing on students' inner psychological quality and teachers' own teaching ability, and less research on teaching environment. In recent years, scholars have gradually turned to the students' learning environment, for example, to study the influence of the learning environment on students' learning attitude, behavior and self-awareness. Although there are many perspectives on teaching environment, the ultimate aim of teaching is to promote the development of students. Therefore, the research of teaching environment also serves teachers' teaching and students' learning, and the test of its effect ends with the students' individual academic development or personality maturation and so on. Through the case study of the public political course in Northeast normal University, the present situation of the classroom teaching environment of the ideological and political public course in contemporary colleges and universities and the present situation of the students' learning methods in this classroom are analyzed. And to explore the impact of public political classroom teaching environment on the way of political class learning for college students. In this study, a questionnaire survey was conducted on the current situation of the public political classroom teaching environment and students' learning styles in D University. The subjects were undergraduates of Grade 2013. According to the teaching style of teachers and the environment created by the whole classroom, the public political lesson is divided into traditional class and new class. The research questions are as follows: 1. What are the different characteristics between the traditional public political classroom and the new public political classroom teaching environment? 2. What is the difference between the traditional public political classroom and the new public political classroom? How do the two different types (traditional and new) of public political classroom teaching environment influence the way of political study of college students? The findings are as follows: (1) the public political classroom teaching environment perceived by D undergraduates is in a good state as a whole. However, the new political class is better than the traditional one in general. (2) the learning style of the undergraduate students' public politics course is different because of the difference of the classroom teaching environment. The concrete manifestation is that in the new type of public politics course in colleges and universities, the students' evaluation of the deep learning style is better than that of the superficial one. However, in the traditional classroom, the scores of surface learning style are high. (3) as far as the relationship between the teaching environment of public political class and the learning style of political class of college students is concerned, no matter it is a new type of public political class, In the traditional public political classroom teaching environment, the organization and implementation of political curriculum, the evaluation and feedback of teachers and the three dimensions of students' input are significantly positively related to the students' deep learning strategies. There is no significant correlation with college students' political lesson learning motivation, but the degree of students' political lesson input is correlated with surface learning strategy. The creation of a good teaching environment in public politics classroom is helpful to cultivate the deep learning style of college students and to promote the improvement of students' learning achievement. Therefore, the improvement of public political classroom teaching environment in colleges and universities is an important breakthrough in improving the quality of public political classroom teaching under the background of popularization of higher education.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：東北師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：G641

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 范春林,董奇;課堂環(huán)境研究的現(xiàn)狀、意義及趨勢(shì)[J];比較教育研究;2005年08期

2 陸根書;楊兆芳;;學(xué)習(xí)環(huán)境與學(xué)生發(fā)展研究述評(píng)[J];比較教育研究;2008年07期

3 謝麗娟;;試論課堂教學(xué)環(huán)境的內(nèi)涵、結(jié)構(gòu)及建設(shè)策略[J];當(dāng)代教育與文化;2009年06期

4 陸根書;;大學(xué)生感知的課堂學(xué)習(xí)環(huán)境對(duì)其學(xué)習(xí)方式的影響[J];復(fù)旦教育論壇;2010年04期

5 張楚廷;;大學(xué)里,什么是一堂好課[J];高等教育研究;2007年03期

6 王秀麗,劉金華;課堂環(huán)境與任務(wù)難度對(duì)學(xué)業(yè)求助的影響[J];教育科學(xué);2002年01期

7 田慧生;論教學(xué)環(huán)境對(duì)學(xué)生學(xué)習(xí)活動(dòng)的潛在影響[J];課程.教材.教法;1993年10期

8 于海琴;李晨;石海梅;;學(xué)習(xí)環(huán)境對(duì)大學(xué)生學(xué)習(xí)方式、學(xué)業(yè)成就的影響——基于本科拔尖創(chuàng)新人才培養(yǎng)的實(shí)證研究[J];高等教育研究;2013年08期

9 黨亭軍;;大學(xué)課堂教學(xué)中,教師應(yīng)當(dāng)做些什么——對(duì)現(xiàn)行大學(xué)課堂教學(xué)模式改革的思考與建議[J];當(dāng)代教育科學(xué);2008年15期

10 丁銳;馬云鵬;;課堂環(huán)境與學(xué)生學(xué)習(xí)表現(xiàn)的因果關(guān)系研究——一個(gè)基于數(shù)學(xué)課堂的前實(shí)驗(yàn)研究[J];全球教育展望;2011年10期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 孫云梅;中國(guó)大學(xué)外語課堂學(xué)習(xí)者社會(huì)心理環(huán)境研究[D];華中科技大學(xué);2007年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 柳靜;班級(jí)環(huán)境的“現(xiàn)實(shí)—理想”一致性與小學(xué)生自我概念及學(xué)業(yè)成就的關(guān)系研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2008年

2 陳湘濤;大眾化背景下高等教育質(zhì)量監(jiān)控研究[D];武漢理工大學(xué);2008年

，

本文編號(hào)：2341857