大學社會評價理念的比較研究
發(fā)布時間：2018-11-15 13:42
【摘要】：隨著我國高等教育的日益發(fā)達，大學社會評價也應運而生，并受到越來越多人的關注。大學社會評價，作為高等教育的第三方評價，相對于政府評價和大學自評，有著不可比擬的優(yōu)勢。但我國大學社會評價由于起步晚、技術落后等原因，一直在不斷摸索中前進。在這其間，我國借鑒很多西方發(fā)達國家大學社會評價的方式，最重要的是大學排行榜，這也是大學社會評價的中堅力量。 大學社會評價的存在，除了基于對高等教育質量的保障的現實需求外，更加是高等教育質量理念的衍生物。它們之間是根與枝的關系，也就是說無論基于何種大學社會評價方式，但最根本的評價理念始終也以種表現形式貫穿在這當中。因此，我們對大學社會評價理念的研究是十分有必有的。 本文的研究正是基于對大學社會評價理念的研究而展開的。以研究西方發(fā)達國家（美、英）的大學社會評價的歷史沿革為基礎，從中挖掘出美英兩國的大學社會評價理念，并從差異性中找出其理念的共性，即：首先，美英兩國的大學社會評價外部體系（包括外部認證保障組織和大學排行榜）都把評價的獨立性和客觀性放在第一位；其次，都以權力相互制衡的理念搭建外部保障體系，以保障公允性；最后，都以滿足一定的社會需求為導向。 找出美英兩國理念上的共性后，再對我國大學社會評價的歷史沿革進行深入的挖掘，歸納出我國大學社會評價所秉承的理念。與西方發(fā)達國家大學社會評價理對比后發(fā)現，我國存在的問題集中體現在：其一，，缺乏對獨立性和客觀性的高度重視；其二，對質量觀單一化評價；其三，重結果，輕過程的評價。針對這三點問題，讀者從政治、經濟和文化角度做出了解析，找出西方發(fā)達國家與我國大學社會評價理念的異同，借鑒西方發(fā)達國家的優(yōu)秀理念，從而樹立我國大學社會評價的理念。
[Abstract]:With the development of higher education in our country, the social evaluation of university comes into being, and more people pay attention to it. College social evaluation, as a third party evaluation of higher education, has an incomparable advantage over government evaluation and university self-evaluation. However, due to the late start and backward technology, the social evaluation of universities in China has been groping forward. During this period, our country draws lessons from the way of university social evaluation in many western developed countries, the most important one is university ranking, which is also the backbone of university social evaluation. The existence of university social evaluation is not only based on the realistic demand for the guarantee of higher education quality, but also a derivative of higher education quality concept. The relationship between them is root and branch, that is to say, no matter what kind of university social evaluation mode, but the most fundamental evaluation concept has always been in the form of expression throughout the process. Therefore, our research on the concept of university social evaluation is very necessary. The research of this paper is based on the research of the concept of university social evaluation. Based on the study of the historical evolution of university social evaluation in western developed countries (America and Britain), this paper excavates out the university social evaluation ideas of the United States and Britain, and finds out the commonness of their ideas from the differences, that is, first of all, The external system of university social evaluation in the United States and Britain (including external certification organizations and university rankings) puts the independence and objectivity of evaluation first. Secondly, the concept of checks and balances of power to build an external security system to ensure fairness; finally, to meet certain social needs as a guide. After finding out the commonness of the American and British concepts, the historical evolution of the university social evaluation in our country is deeply excavated, and the concept of the university social evaluation in our country is summed up. Comparing with the social evaluation theory of university in western developed countries, we find that the problems in our country are as follows: first, lack of attention to independence and objectivity, second, single evaluation of quality view; Third, emphasis on results, less evaluation of the process. In view of these three questions, the readers have made an analysis from the political, economic and cultural angles, found out the similarities and differences between the western developed countries and our university social evaluation ideas, and used the excellent ideas of the western developed countries for reference. So as to establish the concept of social evaluation of universities in China.
【學位授予單位】：長沙理工大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：G640
本文編號：2333466
[Abstract]:With the development of higher education in our country, the social evaluation of university comes into being, and more people pay attention to it. College social evaluation, as a third party evaluation of higher education, has an incomparable advantage over government evaluation and university self-evaluation. However, due to the late start and backward technology, the social evaluation of universities in China has been groping forward. During this period, our country draws lessons from the way of university social evaluation in many western developed countries, the most important one is university ranking, which is also the backbone of university social evaluation. The existence of university social evaluation is not only based on the realistic demand for the guarantee of higher education quality, but also a derivative of higher education quality concept. The relationship between them is root and branch, that is to say, no matter what kind of university social evaluation mode, but the most fundamental evaluation concept has always been in the form of expression throughout the process. Therefore, our research on the concept of university social evaluation is very necessary. The research of this paper is based on the research of the concept of university social evaluation. Based on the study of the historical evolution of university social evaluation in western developed countries (America and Britain), this paper excavates out the university social evaluation ideas of the United States and Britain, and finds out the commonness of their ideas from the differences, that is, first of all, The external system of university social evaluation in the United States and Britain (including external certification organizations and university rankings) puts the independence and objectivity of evaluation first. Secondly, the concept of checks and balances of power to build an external security system to ensure fairness; finally, to meet certain social needs as a guide. After finding out the commonness of the American and British concepts, the historical evolution of the university social evaluation in our country is deeply excavated, and the concept of the university social evaluation in our country is summed up. Comparing with the social evaluation theory of university in western developed countries, we find that the problems in our country are as follows: first, lack of attention to independence and objectivity, second, single evaluation of quality view; Third, emphasis on results, less evaluation of the process. In view of these three questions, the readers have made an analysis from the political, economic and cultural angles, found out the similarities and differences between the western developed countries and our university social evaluation ideas, and used the excellent ideas of the western developed countries for reference. So as to establish the concept of social evaluation of universities in China.
【學位授予單位】：長沙理工大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：G640
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 李田偉;肖海軍;沈小碚;;價值判斷與事實判斷的比較分析——關于教育評價的科學化問題[J];成人教育;2006年11期
2 梁茂信;1860～1920年外來移民對美國城市化的影響[J];東北師大學報;1997年05期
3 余小波;張曉報;;近十五年國內大學社會責任研究的簡要綜述[J];高等理科教育;2011年01期
4 毛道偉;吳業(yè)春;;中美大學分類比較分析——以卡內基分類與武氏分類為例[J];國家教育行政學院學報;2008年10期
5 周廷勇;;美國高等教育評估的演變及其新發(fā)展[J];復旦教育論壇;2009年03期
6 熊耕;;解析美國高等教育中的協(xié)約性規(guī)則[J];比較教育研究;2011年02期
7 秦惠民;;戰(zhàn)后世界各國有關研究生教育的法律制度特點之比較[J];法學家;1996年02期
8 梁戈;;對學術“三A”原則的哲學反思[J];中國電子教育;2004年04期
9 李春芳,莊俊侃;近代美國西部開發(fā)對美國社會的影響[J];甘肅理論學刊;2002年05期
10 王德華;;對我國傳統(tǒng)高等教育評價的實踐反思[J];湖北經濟學院學報(人文社會科學版);2005年05期
本文編號：2333466
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/jiaoyulunwen/shifanjiaoyulunwen/2333466.html
最近更新
教材專著
