【摘要】：進(jìn)入21世紀(jì)以來，高等教育領(lǐng)域已向高等教育大眾化、人才培養(yǎng)全面化、科技開發(fā)尖端化、知識(shí)傳播綜合化方向發(fā)展。2005年，我國提出建設(shè)創(chuàng)新型國家的國策，實(shí)現(xiàn)高等教育強(qiáng)國迫切需要我國高校的建設(shè)和發(fā)展走創(chuàng)新之路，在我國，實(shí)施創(chuàng)新創(chuàng)業(yè)型大學(xué)建設(shè)，有利于為國家建設(shè)培養(yǎng)更多的創(chuàng)新創(chuàng)業(yè)人才。 高校的建設(shè)需要明確自身定位和發(fā)展目標(biāo)，需要有相關(guān)評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)來反映一所高校的建設(shè)狀況，對于實(shí)現(xiàn)教育公平投入、優(yōu)化教育資源配置具有重要意義。我國自2000年以來，一些國內(nèi)機(jī)構(gòu)和組織相繼推出高校排行榜，通過相應(yīng)的評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)對我國大學(xué)排名，這些指標(biāo)的推出為高校進(jìn)行自我定位提供了準(zhǔn)則和發(fā)展目標(biāo)。目前國內(nèi)用于大學(xué)排名的指標(biāo)不完善，對不同類別的高校采用同樣的指標(biāo)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，沒有體現(xiàn)分類原則，指標(biāo)設(shè)計(jì)不論學(xué)校規(guī)模大小，指標(biāo)選取重?cái)?shù)量、輕質(zhì)量，對比國外，更偏向于科學(xué)研究指標(biāo)，沒有做到人才培養(yǎng)和科學(xué)研究并重，沒有較全面反映大學(xué)辦學(xué)與人才培養(yǎng)、科研水平及社會(huì)服務(wù)等內(nèi)容。 我國高校類別多，由于歷史發(fā)展條件不同，教育的投入不均衡，高校所處地域不同，，以及國家教育政策等因素約束，高校的發(fā)展水平和發(fā)展能力千差萬別。高校的發(fā)展不應(yīng)當(dāng)走“千校一面”的道路，不同層次高校之間評(píng)價(jià)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)應(yīng)該有所區(qū)別，高校評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系應(yīng)當(dāng)符合高校走特色發(fā)展之路的需要。建立和完善相應(yīng)的創(chuàng)新創(chuàng)業(yè)型大學(xué)的評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)，有利于從多維角度為政府在調(diào)整與配置高校辦學(xué)資源時(shí)提供參考，有利于高校厘清自身發(fā)展目標(biāo)、找準(zhǔn)辦學(xué)定位，實(shí)現(xiàn)特色辦學(xué)；也有利于提升高校的辦學(xué)效率，提高高校的自身綜合競爭力，實(shí)現(xiàn)更好地可持續(xù)發(fā)展。 本文以創(chuàng)新創(chuàng)業(yè)型大學(xué)為研究對象，在被評(píng)價(jià)主體分類、評(píng)價(jià)體系適用性、評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)的設(shè)計(jì)等方面進(jìn)行了綜合比較研究，針對這類高校進(jìn)行評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系的初步設(shè)計(jì)。首先，從創(chuàng)新創(chuàng)業(yè)型大學(xué)的內(nèi)涵出發(fā)，闡述了這類大學(xué)存在的必要性，以及建設(shè)創(chuàng)新創(chuàng)業(yè)型大學(xué)的優(yōu)勢和意義。其次，對我國現(xiàn)階段國內(nèi)高校分類情況進(jìn)行了概括，描述了創(chuàng)新創(chuàng)業(yè)型大學(xué)的特點(diǎn)和價(jià)值，對我國目前已有的大學(xué)排行指標(biāo)體系進(jìn)行述評(píng)，并借鑒國外一些大學(xué)排行榜的指標(biāo)進(jìn)行了綜合分析。再次，從創(chuàng)新創(chuàng)業(yè)型大學(xué)的職能出發(fā)，結(jié)合創(chuàng)新創(chuàng)業(yè)理論和SWOT理論，對構(gòu)建創(chuàng)新創(chuàng)業(yè)型大學(xué)指標(biāo)體系進(jìn)行了系統(tǒng)分析。最后，根據(jù)創(chuàng)新創(chuàng)業(yè)型大學(xué)評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)設(shè)立的原則和依據(jù)，在指標(biāo)設(shè)計(jì)中重視投入產(chǎn)出因素，強(qiáng)化均量指標(biāo)設(shè)計(jì)，以體現(xiàn)指標(biāo)比較的公平性，初步提出由投入指標(biāo)、創(chuàng)新人才指標(biāo)、創(chuàng)新科技研究、產(chǎn)學(xué)研成果指標(biāo)四個(gè)一級(jí)指標(biāo)以及25個(gè)二級(jí)指標(biāo)組成的創(chuàng)新創(chuàng)業(yè)型大學(xué)評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系。期望能在實(shí)現(xiàn)優(yōu)化高等教育資源公平配置方面提供參考依據(jù)，為同類研究提供相關(guān)借鑒。
[Abstract]:Since the beginning of the 21st century, the field of higher education has become more and more popular, the cultivation of talents has been comprehensive, the development of science and technology has been advanced, and the direction of knowledge dissemination has been comprehensive. In 2005, China put forward the national policy of building an innovative country. The realization of a powerful country in higher education urgently needs the construction and development of colleges and universities in our country to take the road of innovation. In our country, the implementation of innovative and entrepreneurial university construction is conducive to the cultivation of more innovative and entrepreneurial talents for the construction of the country. The construction of colleges and universities needs to define their own orientation and development goals, and to have relevant evaluation indicators to reflect the construction situation of a university. It is of great significance to realize the fair input of education and optimize the allocation of educational resources. Since 2000, a number of domestic institutions and organizations have launched the ranking list of colleges and universities. Through the corresponding evaluation indicators, the introduction of these indicators provides a criterion and a development goal for colleges and universities to position themselves. At present, the index used in the ranking of universities in China is not perfect, the same index standard is adopted for different kinds of colleges and universities, and the principle of classification is not reflected. The index design, regardless of the size of the school, the selection of the index, the weight of quantity, the weight of quality, the comparison of foreign countries, It is more inclined to scientific research index, not paying equal attention to talent training and scientific research, and does not reflect the contents of university running and talent training, scientific research level and social service. There are many kinds of colleges and universities in our country. Due to the different historical development conditions, unbalanced investment in education, different regions of colleges and universities, and the constraints of national educational policies, the development level and ability of colleges and universities are very different. The development of colleges and universities should not follow the road of "one side of a thousand schools", the evaluation standards of different levels of colleges and universities should be different, and the evaluation index system of colleges and universities should meet the needs of colleges and universities to take the road of characteristic development. The establishment and perfection of corresponding evaluation indexes of innovative and entrepreneurial universities is conducive to providing a reference for the government to adjust and allocate the resources of running a university from a multidimensional perspective, and to clarify its own development objectives and to find the correct orientation of running a school. To realize the characteristic running school; It also helps to improve the efficiency of running schools, improve the comprehensive competitiveness of colleges and universities, and achieve better sustainable development. This paper makes a comprehensive comparative study on the subject classification, the applicability of evaluation system and the design of evaluation index, aiming at the preliminary design of evaluation index system for innovative entrepreneurial universities. First of all, from the connotation of innovative entrepreneurial universities, this paper expounds the necessity of the existence of such universities, as well as the advantages and significance of constructing innovative entrepreneurial universities. Secondly, this paper summarizes the classification of domestic universities at present, describes the characteristics and value of innovative entrepreneurial universities, and reviews the existing ranking index system of universities in China. And draw lessons from a number of foreign university ranking indicators for comprehensive analysis. Thirdly, starting from the function of innovative entrepreneurial universities, combining the theory of innovation entrepreneurship and SWOT theory, this paper systematically analyzes the index system of innovative entrepreneurial universities. Finally, according to the principle and basis of establishing evaluation index of innovative entrepreneurial university, we attach importance to the input-output factor in the index design, strengthen the average quantity index design, so as to reflect the fairness of the index comparison, and put forward the preliminary input index. The evaluation index system of innovative entrepreneurial universities is composed of four primary indexes and 25 secondary indexes. It is expected to provide reference for similar research on how to optimize the fair allocation of higher education resources.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京工業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：G649.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 丹尼爾·W·朗恩,施曉光;“世界級(jí)”大學(xué)是比較出來的嗎?[J];北京大學(xué)教育評(píng)論;2005年01期

2 賈順蓮;;中日大學(xué)評(píng)價(jià)制度比較[J];重慶科技學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年03期

3 肖鳴政;高校排名問題及其管理學(xué)研究[J];東北師大學(xué)報(bào);2004年04期

4 劉堯;中國大學(xué)排名的歷史、依據(jù)與市場[J];中國地質(zhì)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2005年06期

5 莊峗;;中外大學(xué)綜合評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系的比較分析[J];讀與寫(教育教學(xué)刊);2010年05期

6 徐小洲;佛朝暉;林曉;;全球視野下的大學(xué)評(píng)價(jià)——“國際大學(xué)評(píng)價(jià)學(xué)術(shù)咨詢委員會(huì)”會(huì)議綜述[J];高等工程教育研究;2006年03期

7 蔡言厚;蔡莉;;“中國大學(xué)評(píng)價(jià)”的三級(jí)指標(biāo)權(quán)重需要修改[J];中國高等教育評(píng)估;2007年02期

8 趙文華;易高峰;;創(chuàng)業(yè)型大學(xué)發(fā)展模式研究——基于研究型大學(xué)模式創(chuàng)新的視角[J];高教探索;2011年02期

9 張曉鵬;大學(xué)排名與世界一流大學(xué)建設(shè)——第一屆“世界一流大學(xué)”國際研討會(huì)述評(píng)[J];復(fù)旦教育論壇;2005年04期

10 謝安邦;童康;;我國大學(xué)排行研究與實(shí)踐的進(jìn)展及評(píng)析[J];高等教育研究;2006年06期

本文編號(hào)：2322071