【摘要】：2011年，我國(guó)高等教育學(xué)校(機(jī)構(gòu))普通本科、�？粕谛W(xué)生數(shù)達(dá)到2300余萬(wàn)人。隨著我國(guó)高校規(guī)模不斷擴(kuò)大、社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)轉(zhuǎn)型升級(jí)、網(wǎng)絡(luò)技術(shù)的普及，大學(xué)生在道德、價(jià)值觀上發(fā)生了巨大的變化，學(xué)生自殺事件、校園火災(zāi)、校園暴力事件等校園危機(jī)層出不窮，并顯示出易發(fā)性和破壞性。這不僅對(duì)學(xué)校的和諧發(fā)展帶來(lái)威脅，也對(duì)高校傳統(tǒng)管理觀念與體制提出挑戰(zhàn)，如何應(yīng)對(duì)校園危機(jī)成為高校迫切需要解決的問(wèn)題。 本文首先在對(duì)國(guó)內(nèi)外相關(guān)研究成果進(jìn)行分析整理的基礎(chǔ)上，結(jié)合了管理學(xué)、社會(huì)學(xué)等相關(guān)理論，對(duì)危機(jī)、突發(fā)事件、校園危機(jī)管理這幾個(gè)概念給出了自己的看法和界定，并對(duì)危機(jī)和突發(fā)事件這一對(duì)相似的概念做出區(qū)別，以明確本文的研究對(duì)象。之后通過(guò)一些常見(jiàn)的事例對(duì)高校校園危機(jī)事件做出分類，并將高校校園危機(jī)的特點(diǎn)歸納為：社會(huì)地位特殊，受關(guān)注程度高；輻射速度快，，影響范圍廣泛；主體思想性格活躍，行為沖動(dòng)過(guò)激；誘因復(fù)雜，處理困難四個(gè)方面。 其次，為了客觀、全面的了解當(dāng)前我國(guó)高校校園危機(jī)應(yīng)對(duì)的現(xiàn)狀，筆者采取發(fā)放問(wèn)卷的形式進(jìn)行了信息的收集。2012年3月，筆者選取了南京工業(yè)大學(xué)、河海大學(xué)、應(yīng)天學(xué)院三所學(xué)校共400名在校學(xué)生進(jìn)行問(wèn)卷調(diào)查，并對(duì)南京工業(yè)大學(xué)個(gè)別輔導(dǎo)員、黨政機(jī)關(guān)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)進(jìn)行了訪談。通過(guò)調(diào)查，筆者總結(jié)出學(xué)校在校園危機(jī)管理方面存在五個(gè)方面的問(wèn)題：缺乏規(guī)范的校園危機(jī)知識(shí)教育；缺乏校園危機(jī)應(yīng)對(duì)體制保障；危機(jī)管理理念落后；信息溝通不暢；缺乏恢復(fù)評(píng)估措施。之后從社會(huì)生態(tài)學(xué)的角度將高校校園危機(jī)的誘因劃分為社會(huì)、學(xué)校、家庭、個(gè)人四大方面，并結(jié)合調(diào)查問(wèn)卷進(jìn)行分析。 最后，綜合對(duì)我國(guó)高校校園危機(jī)現(xiàn)狀的描述，基于對(duì)高校校園危機(jī)發(fā)生原因的分析，從危機(jī)的預(yù)防階段、危機(jī)的處置階段、危機(jī)的恢復(fù)階段這三個(gè)方面對(duì)高校校園危機(jī)事件的應(yīng)對(duì)提出一些措施，并認(rèn)為，高校校園危機(jī)的應(yīng)對(duì)應(yīng)當(dāng)以預(yù)防危機(jī)的發(fā)生為重點(diǎn)，科學(xué)處置危機(jī)事件為核心，做好危機(jī)后的評(píng)估恢復(fù)工作為關(guān)鍵，將校園危機(jī)管理納入到學(xué)校日常的工作中去。
[Abstract]:In 2011, the number of undergraduate students in Colleges and universities in China reached more than 23 million. With the continuous expansion of universities, social and economic transformation and upgrading, the popularization of network technology, college students have undergone tremendous changes in morality and values, student suicides, campus fires, campus violence and other campus dangers. It not only threatens the harmonious development of the university, but also challenges the traditional management concept and system of the university. How to deal with the campus crisis has become an urgent problem for the university to solve.
Firstly, based on the analysis and collation of relevant research results at home and abroad, combined with the relevant theories of management and sociology, this paper gives its own views and definitions on the concepts of crisis, emergency and campus crisis management, and makes a distinction between the two similar concepts of crisis and emergency in order to clarify the study of this paper. Subject. Then, through some common examples to classify the college campus crisis, and the characteristics of the college campus crisis are summarized as follows: special social status, high degree of concern; rapid radiation, a wide range of influence; subject thinking and personality active, excessive impulse behavior; complex incentives, difficult to deal with four aspects.
Secondly, in order to objectively and comprehensively understand the current situation of college campus crisis response in China, the author collects information by sending out questionnaires. In March 2012, the author selected 400 students from Nanjing University of Technology, Hehai University and Yingtian University to conduct a questionnaire survey, and gave individual counseling to Nanjing University of Technology. Through investigation, the author concludes that there are five problems in campus crisis management: lack of standardized campus crisis knowledge education; lack of campus crisis response system guarantee; backward crisis management concept; poor information communication; lack of recovery and evaluation measures. From the perspective of ecology, this paper divides the causes of campus crisis into four aspects: society, school, family and individual, and analyzes them with questionnaires.
Finally, based on the comprehensive description of the present situation of the campus crisis in our country and the analysis of the causes of the campus crisis, this paper puts forward some measures to deal with the campus crisis from the three aspects of the crisis prevention stage, the crisis disposal stage and the crisis recovery stage, and believes that the campus crisis should be dealt with in order to prevent the crisis. The occurrence of the opportunity is the key point, the scientific disposal of the crisis is the core, the post-crisis assessment and recovery is the key, and the campus crisis management is brought into the daily work of the school.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京工業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：G647

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 朱曉斌;美國(guó)學(xué)校危機(jī)管理的模式與政策[J];比較教育研究;2004年12期

2 黃繼英;高校要培養(yǎng)學(xué)生應(yīng)對(duì)突發(fā)事件的能力[J];北京教育(高教版);2004年06期

3 王郅強(qiáng);文宏;;淺析高校危機(jī)管理體系中的心理干預(yù)機(jī)制[J];北京科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年01期

4 孫蘭英;;論高校突發(fā)性事件的預(yù)警教育機(jī)制[J];北京科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年03期

5 郭正賢;高校危機(jī)管理的探索[J];長(zhǎng)春工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2003年04期

6 楊云涵;;論高校危機(jī)管理機(jī)制的構(gòu)建[J];長(zhǎng)春工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(高教研究版);2010年04期

7 秦琴;淺析高校危機(jī)管理中的黨建與思想政治工作[J];重慶工學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年04期

8 馬建珍;淺析政府危機(jī)管理[J];長(zhǎng)江論壇;2003年05期

9 楊佳;陳小林;;新時(shí)期我國(guó)高校危機(jī)的特征分析及危機(jī)管理策略[J];電子科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社科版);2007年01期

10 熊永華,周貴忠,楊衛(wèi)軍;淺談?lì)A(yù)防和處置高校突發(fā)事件[J];黨史文苑;2005年06期

本文編號(hào)：2182449