本文選題：大學 + 道德責任��； 參考：《山東師范大學》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：大學作為特殊的社會組織，自其誕生之日起便被視為“社會的良心”、象牙塔，承擔著道德責任。道德責任是一個變化發(fā)展的概念，在大學的發(fā)展歷史中不斷擴展，而今大學在融入社會中心時，在全球道德危機的背景之下，大學的“社會良心”形象嚴重受損，精神追求缺失。大學早已不是過去所謂的“心靈凈土”和“精神家園”，不再是社會道德和學術(shù)的燈塔，與社會的期待形成鮮明反差，嚴重削弱了大學的精神感染和社會支持信任。道德方面的失落，使自身深陷困境。那么此時對大學道德責任的尋根溯源，通過深入解析和探尋大學道德責任的演變，以求能夠?qū)で蟠髮W道德責任發(fā)展的規(guī)律，并為當今道德精神的重建提供依據(jù)。 大學道德責任的歷史演變分為三個階段，即中世紀的大學道德責任演變，17世紀至19世紀，19世紀末至現(xiàn)在。在每個階段中分別指出該階段大學道德責任演變的事實及分析道德責任發(fā)展的特征及問題。最后提出應對大學道德責任發(fā)展中出現(xiàn)問題的對策及對當今道德啟示意義。在中世紀大學具有強烈的批判精神，并且以培養(yǎng)人的終極目標為目的，是社會的良心。隨著產(chǎn)業(yè)革命的進行，教育的地位逐漸提高，大學發(fā)展出科學研究職能，大學不僅僅要對自身的道德負責，還要對科學研究中的學術(shù)活動負道德責任，同樣不能忽視大學道德教育。隨著社會持續(xù)發(fā)展，國家之間經(jīng)濟、政治競爭的壓力，和大學自身經(jīng)費的困難，，使得大學和國家之間相互依賴，大學也逐漸失去學術(shù)自由，在社會中的批判力量下降，大學教授關(guān)注自身的利益多過學校利益。這是大學功利主義思想盛行的結(jié)果，這使大學管理混亂，社會風氣日下，大學道德責任亟待重建。 大學在發(fā)展過程中不能只顧眼前利益，忽視其存在的真正價值，對真理的追求，以學術(shù)為中心的氛圍。大學在道德教育時不能采取灌輸式的教學，應該賦予道德以實際的意義。大學的制度亟待改善，制度化的科系，制度化的管理在一定程度上影響學術(shù)自由。在追求學術(shù)自由時，要時刻謹記尊重知識的理性，自己在社會中的道德責任。大學教授在學術(shù)研究中，不能僅關(guān)注學術(shù)成果，還要關(guān)心道德要求，處理好學術(shù)自由與社會責任的關(guān)系。
[Abstract]:As a special social organization, university has been regarded as "social conscience" since its birth. Moral responsibility is a concept of change and development, which has been expanding in the history of university development. Now, when the university is integrated into the center of society and in the context of the global moral crisis, the image of "social conscience" of the university is seriously damaged. Lack of spiritual pursuit. The university is no longer the so-called "spiritual land" and "spiritual home" in the past, and is no longer a beacon of social morality and learning, which is in sharp contrast to the expectation of the society, which seriously weakens the university's spiritual infection and social support trust. Moral loss, make oneself in deep trouble. Then the source of the university moral responsibility at this time, through in-depth analysis and exploration of the evolution of university moral responsibility, in order to be able to seek the law of the development of university moral responsibility, and provide a basis for the reconstruction of the moral spirit today. The historical evolution of university moral responsibility is divided into three stages: the evolution of university moral responsibility in the Middle Ages from the 17th century to the 19th century and from the end of the 19th century to the present. In each stage, the author points out the facts of the evolution of university moral responsibility and analyzes the characteristics and problems of the development of moral responsibility. Finally, the author puts forward the countermeasures to deal with the problems in the development of university moral responsibility and its significance for moral enlightenment. In the Middle Ages, universities had a strong critical spirit, and the ultimate goal of cultivating human beings was the conscience of society. With the development of the industrial revolution, the status of education has gradually increased, and universities have developed the function of scientific research. Universities should not only be responsible for their own morality, but also take moral responsibility for the academic activities in scientific research. Similarly, moral education in universities should not be ignored. With the sustained development of society, the pressure of economic and political competition among countries, and the difficulties of the universities' own funds, the universities and the countries depend on each other, and the universities gradually lose their academic freedom, and the critical forces in the society decrease. College professors focus more on their own interests than on their own. This is the result of the prevalence of utilitarianism in universities, which makes the management of universities chaotic, the social atmosphere declining, and the moral responsibility of universities urgently need to be rebuilt. In the process of development, universities should not only pay attention to immediate interests, ignore the true value of their existence, pursue truth, and focus on the atmosphere of learning. In moral education, universities should not adopt the teaching of infusion, and should give practical significance to morality. The institution of university needs to be improved. The institutionalized management of department and department affects academic freedom to a certain extent. In the pursuit of academic freedom, always remember to respect the rationality of knowledge, their own moral responsibility in society. In academic research, university professors should not only focus on academic achievements, but also on moral requirements and deal with the relationship between academic freedom and social responsibility.
【學位授予單位】：山東師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：G641

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 眭依凡;改造社會：未來大學新職能[J];上海高教研究;1995年03期

2 王雷;;論大學對社會德育質(zhì)量的提升——從我國近代大學知識群體參與社會教育談起[J];沈陽師范大學學報(社會科學版);2008年06期

3 徐銳;;德里克·博克的大學道德教育思想及其啟示[J];外國教育研究;2009年04期

4 董云川;調(diào)適大學與政府和社會的關(guān)系 改善中國大學生存與發(fā)展狀態(tài)[J];現(xiàn)代大學教育;2003年06期

5 孫華;;論大學的道德責任[J];現(xiàn)代大學教育;2007年01期

6 劉會勝;周小金;;中國大學,永恒的機構(gòu)還是應時的存在[J];現(xiàn)代大學教育;2011年04期

相關(guān)博士學位論文 前2條

1 劉亞敏;大學精神探論[D];華中科技大學;2004年

2 石廣盛;歐洲中世紀大學研究[D];復旦大學;2007年

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前2條

1 王明洲;大學職能轉(zhuǎn)變與組織創(chuàng)新的歷史考察[D];蘇州大學;2003年

2 張超;大學職能的歷史把握與辯證分析[D];中央民族大學;2007年

本文編號：1838727