大學(xué)道德責(zé)任的歷史演變及啟示
本文選題:大學(xué) + 道德責(zé)任 ; 參考:《山東師范大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文
【摘要】:大學(xué)作為特殊的社會組織,自其誕生之日起便被視為“社會的良心”、象牙塔,承擔(dān)著道德責(zé)任。道德責(zé)任是一個(gè)變化發(fā)展的概念,在大學(xué)的發(fā)展歷史中不斷擴(kuò)展,而今大學(xué)在融入社會中心時(shí),在全球道德危機(jī)的背景之下,大學(xué)的“社會良心”形象嚴(yán)重受損,精神追求缺失。大學(xué)早已不是過去所謂的“心靈凈土”和“精神家園”,不再是社會道德和學(xué)術(shù)的燈塔,與社會的期待形成鮮明反差,嚴(yán)重削弱了大學(xué)的精神感染和社會支持信任。道德方面的失落,使自身深陷困境。那么此時(shí)對大學(xué)道德責(zé)任的尋根溯源,通過深入解析和探尋大學(xué)道德責(zé)任的演變,以求能夠?qū)で蟠髮W(xué)道德責(zé)任發(fā)展的規(guī)律,并為當(dāng)今道德精神的重建提供依據(jù)。 大學(xué)道德責(zé)任的歷史演變分為三個(gè)階段,即中世紀(jì)的大學(xué)道德責(zé)任演變,17世紀(jì)至19世紀(jì),19世紀(jì)末至現(xiàn)在。在每個(gè)階段中分別指出該階段大學(xué)道德責(zé)任演變的事實(shí)及分析道德責(zé)任發(fā)展的特征及問題。最后提出應(yīng)對大學(xué)道德責(zé)任發(fā)展中出現(xiàn)問題的對策及對當(dāng)今道德啟示意義。在中世紀(jì)大學(xué)具有強(qiáng)烈的批判精神,并且以培養(yǎng)人的終極目標(biāo)為目的,是社會的良心。隨著產(chǎn)業(yè)革命的進(jìn)行,教育的地位逐漸提高,大學(xué)發(fā)展出科學(xué)研究職能,大學(xué)不僅僅要對自身的道德負(fù)責(zé),還要對科學(xué)研究中的學(xué)術(shù)活動負(fù)道德責(zé)任,同樣不能忽視大學(xué)道德教育。隨著社會持續(xù)發(fā)展,國家之間經(jīng)濟(jì)、政治競爭的壓力,和大學(xué)自身經(jīng)費(fèi)的困難,,使得大學(xué)和國家之間相互依賴,大學(xué)也逐漸失去學(xué)術(shù)自由,在社會中的批判力量下降,大學(xué)教授關(guān)注自身的利益多過學(xué)校利益。這是大學(xué)功利主義思想盛行的結(jié)果,這使大學(xué)管理混亂,社會風(fēng)氣日下,大學(xué)道德責(zé)任亟待重建。 大學(xué)在發(fā)展過程中不能只顧眼前利益,忽視其存在的真正價(jià)值,對真理的追求,以學(xué)術(shù)為中心的氛圍。大學(xué)在道德教育時(shí)不能采取灌輸式的教學(xué),應(yīng)該賦予道德以實(shí)際的意義。大學(xué)的制度亟待改善,制度化的科系,制度化的管理在一定程度上影響學(xué)術(shù)自由。在追求學(xué)術(shù)自由時(shí),要時(shí)刻謹(jǐn)記尊重知識的理性,自己在社會中的道德責(zé)任。大學(xué)教授在學(xué)術(shù)研究中,不能僅關(guān)注學(xué)術(shù)成果,還要關(guān)心道德要求,處理好學(xué)術(shù)自由與社會責(zé)任的關(guān)系。
[Abstract]:As a special social organization, university has been regarded as "social conscience" since its birth. Moral responsibility is a concept of change and development, which has been expanding in the history of university development. Now, when the university is integrated into the center of society and in the context of the global moral crisis, the image of "social conscience" of the university is seriously damaged. Lack of spiritual pursuit. The university is no longer the so-called "spiritual land" and "spiritual home" in the past, and is no longer a beacon of social morality and learning, which is in sharp contrast to the expectation of the society, which seriously weakens the university's spiritual infection and social support trust. Moral loss, make oneself in deep trouble. Then the source of the university moral responsibility at this time, through in-depth analysis and exploration of the evolution of university moral responsibility, in order to be able to seek the law of the development of university moral responsibility, and provide a basis for the reconstruction of the moral spirit today. The historical evolution of university moral responsibility is divided into three stages: the evolution of university moral responsibility in the Middle Ages from the 17th century to the 19th century and from the end of the 19th century to the present. In each stage, the author points out the facts of the evolution of university moral responsibility and analyzes the characteristics and problems of the development of moral responsibility. Finally, the author puts forward the countermeasures to deal with the problems in the development of university moral responsibility and its significance for moral enlightenment. In the Middle Ages, universities had a strong critical spirit, and the ultimate goal of cultivating human beings was the conscience of society. With the development of the industrial revolution, the status of education has gradually increased, and universities have developed the function of scientific research. Universities should not only be responsible for their own morality, but also take moral responsibility for the academic activities in scientific research. Similarly, moral education in universities should not be ignored. With the sustained development of society, the pressure of economic and political competition among countries, and the difficulties of the universities' own funds, the universities and the countries depend on each other, and the universities gradually lose their academic freedom, and the critical forces in the society decrease. College professors focus more on their own interests than on their own. This is the result of the prevalence of utilitarianism in universities, which makes the management of universities chaotic, the social atmosphere declining, and the moral responsibility of universities urgently need to be rebuilt. In the process of development, universities should not only pay attention to immediate interests, ignore the true value of their existence, pursue truth, and focus on the atmosphere of learning. In moral education, universities should not adopt the teaching of infusion, and should give practical significance to morality. The institution of university needs to be improved. The institutionalized management of department and department affects academic freedom to a certain extent. In the pursuit of academic freedom, always remember to respect the rationality of knowledge, their own moral responsibility in society. In academic research, university professors should not only focus on academic achievements, but also on moral requirements and deal with the relationship between academic freedom and social responsibility.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:山東師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2013
【分類號】:G641
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條
1 眭依凡;改造社會:未來大學(xué)新職能[J];上海高教研究;1995年03期
2 王雷;;論大學(xué)對社會德育質(zhì)量的提升——從我國近代大學(xué)知識群體參與社會教育談起[J];沈陽師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2008年06期
3 徐銳;;德里克·博克的大學(xué)道德教育思想及其啟示[J];外國教育研究;2009年04期
4 董云川;調(diào)適大學(xué)與政府和社會的關(guān)系 改善中國大學(xué)生存與發(fā)展?fàn)顟B(tài)[J];現(xiàn)代大學(xué)教育;2003年06期
5 孫華;;論大學(xué)的道德責(zé)任[J];現(xiàn)代大學(xué)教育;2007年01期
6 劉會勝;周小金;;中國大學(xué),永恒的機(jī)構(gòu)還是應(yīng)時(shí)的存在[J];現(xiàn)代大學(xué)教育;2011年04期
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條
1 劉亞敏;大學(xué)精神探論[D];華中科技大學(xué);2004年
2 石廣盛;歐洲中世紀(jì)大學(xué)研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2007年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條
1 王明洲;大學(xué)職能轉(zhuǎn)變與組織創(chuàng)新的歷史考察[D];蘇州大學(xué);2003年
2 張超;大學(xué)職能的歷史把握與辯證分析[D];中央民族大學(xué);2007年
本文編號:1838727
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/jiaoyulunwen/shifanjiaoyulunwen/1838727.html