本文關(guān)鍵詞： 經(jīng)濟(jì)環(huán)境 心理健康 相對(duì)貧困 絕對(duì)貧困 經(jīng)濟(jì)自立　出處：《四川師范大學(xué)》2008年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】： 本文從經(jīng)濟(jì)環(huán)境的四個(gè)層面:對(duì)貧富的理解(經(jīng)濟(jì)環(huán)境意識(shí))、貧困的原因、相對(duì)貧困和絕對(duì)貧困、經(jīng)濟(jì)自立(意識(shí))出發(fā),利用問卷所得的一些經(jīng)濟(jì)指標(biāo)上的數(shù)據(jù),從焦慮、抑郁、人際關(guān)系敏感、敵對(duì)四個(gè)角度綜合研究其對(duì)心理健康的影響。在經(jīng)濟(jì)指標(biāo)上采用了總收入、總支出、用餐支出為代表的各類分項(xiàng)支出等;在經(jīng)濟(jì)自立上采用了家里給的、獲得資助的、獲得獎(jiǎng)勵(lì)的、打工賺的、借貸的等幾個(gè)能夠反映經(jīng)濟(jì)自立意識(shí)程度的指標(biāo)。 通過對(duì)被試態(tài)度的變化、指標(biāo)的變化和心理健康四個(gè)因子得分變化之間聯(lián)立關(guān)系的分析,本研究得出了一些有益的結(jié)果和結(jié)論。 對(duì)貧富標(biāo)準(zhǔn)理解的差異使被試的心理健康水平有很大的差別。占有(或者剝奪)是影響心理健康水平的重要指標(biāo),而非享有多少,但對(duì)貧富的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)沒有清晰概念的被試心理健康水平最低。 不管是社會(huì)原因造成的貧困還是家庭原因造成的貧困都會(huì)使個(gè)體的心理朝不健康的狀態(tài)傾斜,但若強(qiáng)烈的認(rèn)為是社會(huì)原因造成的貧困則易使個(gè)體患上嚴(yán)重的心理障礙,對(duì)此觀點(diǎn)的態(tài)度稍緩和一些的被試心理健康狀況要好 相對(duì)貧困易使個(gè)體產(chǎn)生焦慮、抑郁等不良心理,但不一定會(huì)有敵對(duì)心理和行為。敵對(duì)行為的產(chǎn)生和相對(duì)貧困沒有必然關(guān)系,和產(chǎn)生相對(duì)貧困的原因有直接關(guān)系. 除了兩個(gè)極端點(diǎn)外(過高過低的支出不利于心理健康),隨著支出水平的上升,個(gè)體的心理健康水平也逐漸上升,其中用餐支出對(duì)個(gè)體的心理影響最大。其他各項(xiàng)支出和心理健康水平有一個(gè)共同的關(guān)系,即中等程度的支出最不利于心理健康,偏高或偏低的支出反而對(duì)心理健康的影響更有益些。 參加勤工助學(xué)可以給個(gè)體帶來一定的收入和物質(zhì)補(bǔ)助,對(duì)緩解個(gè)體尤其是貧困生的經(jīng)濟(jì)壓力是有幫助的,從而可以降低其焦慮水平。 適當(dāng)?shù)募彝ス┙o對(duì)于大學(xué)生來說可以緩解焦慮和抑郁情緒,但若過高,則適得其反,這時(shí)反而沒有任何家庭供給的被試心理健康水平還好些。借款和資助與心理健康的關(guān)系與其有相當(dāng)一致的關(guān)系。 中等程度的獎(jiǎng)勵(lì)和打工收入都可以有效的解決個(gè)體的心理不適。但一旦偏離這個(gè)程度,心理健康水平則開始下降。
[Abstract]:This paper starts from four aspects of the economic environment: understanding of the rich and poor (economic environmental awareness, the causes of poverty, relative poverty and absolute poverty, economic self-reliance (consciousness)). Using the data of some economic indicators obtained from the questionnaire, the effects of anxiety, depression, interpersonal sensitivity and hostility on mental health were comprehensively studied. The total income and total expenditure were used in the economic indicators. Meal expenses are representative of the various items of expenditure, etc.; In terms of economic independence, several indicators of economic self-reliance are adopted, such as those given at home, supported, rewarded, employed, borrowed, and so on, which can reflect the degree of economic self-reliance. Based on the analysis of the relationship among the change of attitude, the change of index and the change of the score of mental health, some useful results and conclusions are obtained in this study. The difference in understanding the standard of the rich and the poor makes the mental health level of the subjects very different. Possession (or deprivation) is an important indicator of the level of mental health, not how much. However, the mental health level of the subjects without a clear concept of the criteria for the rich and the poor was the lowest. Whether it is the poverty caused by social reasons or the poverty caused by family reasons, the individual psychology will be inclined to unhealthy state. However, if there is a strong belief that poverty is caused by social reasons, it is easy for individuals to suffer from serious psychological obstacles. The attitude towards this view is better for the subjects who are slightly more relaxed in their mental health. Relative poverty makes individuals produce anxiety, depression and other bad psychology, but there is not necessarily hostile psychology and behavior. The emergence of hostile behavior and relative poverty is not necessarily related. And the causes of relative poverty are directly related. In addition to the two extreme points (too high and too low expenditure is not conducive to mental health), with the level of expenditure increased, the level of mental health of individuals also gradually increased. There is a common relationship between the other expenditure and mental health level, that is, the middle level of expenditure is the most harmful to mental health. Higher or lower spending is more beneficial to mental health. Taking part in part-time work study can bring certain income and material subsidy to individual, which is helpful to alleviate the economic pressure of individual, especially poor students, and thus can reduce their anxiety level. Proper family supply can relieve anxiety and depression for college students, but if it is too high, it will be counterproductive. At this time, the mental health level of the subjects who did not have any family supply was better. The relationship between borrowing and financial aid and mental health was quite consistent. A moderate level of reward and working income can effectively address individual psychological discomfort, but once deviated from this level, mental health levels begin to decline.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：四川師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2008
【分類號(hào)】：B844.2

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 徐勤山;三都水族地區(qū)貧困問題及對(duì)策研究[D];貴州民族學(xué)院;2011年

，

本文編號(hào)：1446125