本文選題：形容詞 + 轉(zhuǎn)喻�。� 參考：《北京語言大學(xué)》2009年博士論文

【摘要】：人們對外部世界的認(rèn)知是以空間概念為基礎(chǔ)的,漢語中很多非空間概念都是由空間概念隱喻而來的,而空間形容詞的內(nèi)部不同語義之間都存在著空間概念到非空間概念的隱喻現(xiàn)象,空間形容詞的研究對漢語整體隱喻現(xiàn)象的研究有著舉足輕重的地位。具有[+下向]和[+內(nèi)向]語義特征的空間形容詞“深”與其他空間形容詞相比,它語義上的隱喻、轉(zhuǎn)喻現(xiàn)象及其構(gòu)詞、句法特征都有著特殊之處,而且“深”的這些特殊語義和用法也是留學(xué)生的學(xué)習(xí)難點。 本文運用認(rèn)知語言學(xué)的相關(guān)理論,選擇空間形容詞“深”進行詳細(xì)深入的分析,試圖解決如下幾個問題:(一)“深”具體包含哪些義項?它們之間存在著哪些隱喻與轉(zhuǎn)喻現(xiàn)象?其隱喻和轉(zhuǎn)喻的路徑如何?;(二)和“深”有家族相似性的形容詞有哪些?“深”和同族成員之間在語義上有何異同?;(三)“深”在構(gòu)詞和句法上有何特點?;(四)“深”和“淺”之間具有哪些對稱與不對稱現(xiàn)象?這些現(xiàn)象產(chǎn)生的動因是什么?;(五)漢語的“深”和韓語的“(?)[kipta]”有何異同? 全文共分七個部分:第一部分是緒論,介紹本文的選題緣由、理論基礎(chǔ)、研究方法及前人研究概況。第二部分和第三部分從認(rèn)知的角度對空間范疇“深”進行詳細(xì)的分析,系統(tǒng)地探討“深”的基本義、轉(zhuǎn)喻義和隱喻義,進而考察“深”與其它語義相近的同族形容詞成員之間的異同。第四部分探討“深”在構(gòu)詞和句法上的特點。第五部分討論“深”和“淺”的對稱與不對稱問題。第六部分對漢語的“深”與韓語的“(?)[kipta]”進行比較,考察二者在空間隱喻上的異同。第七部分是結(jié)語。 本文的創(chuàng)新之處主要有以下五點:(一)對“深”的語義進行了系統(tǒng)性的分析,通過細(xì)化其基本義的語義特征,揭示了基本義到轉(zhuǎn)喻義、基本義到隱喻義、轉(zhuǎn)喻義到隱喻義的語義擴展路徑;(二)找出了與“深”語義相近的同族形容詞,揭示了“深”與它們在語義和語用上的差異,以及這些同族形容詞成員之間的關(guān)系;(三)利用維度概念和“深”的語義特征,概括了“深”與其他單音節(jié)形容詞的構(gòu)詞規(guī)則;(四)對“深”和“淺”的對稱與不對稱現(xiàn)象進行了全面的描寫,并對其進行了合理的解釋;(五)對比分析了“深”與韓語“(?)[kipta]”的語義和語法特征,在此基礎(chǔ)上利用通感隱喻給予了認(rèn)知上的解釋。 本文的價值在于:(一)對單個形容詞進行系統(tǒng)性的分析,彌補了以往相關(guān)研究的空缺;(二)本文的研究并不止于“深”這一單個形容詞的個案研究,其研究思路及成果可以擴展到整個空間形容詞范疇;(三)漢語“深”的研究可以為空間形容詞的類型學(xué)研究提供參考;(四)本文在語義、構(gòu)詞和句法上的研究成果可為現(xiàn)行對外漢語教學(xué)提供理論依據(jù)。
[Abstract]:People's cognition of the outside world is based on the concept of space, and many non-spatial concepts in Chinese come from the metaphor of space concept. However, there is a metaphorical phenomenon between spatial concept and non-spatial concept between different semantics of spatial adjectives, and the study of spatial adjectives plays an important role in the study of Chinese overall metaphor. Compared with other spatial adjectives, the semantic metaphors, metonymy phenomena, word formation and syntactic features of the spatial adjectives with the semantic characteristics of "deep" and "introverted" have special features. Moreover, these special semantics and usage of "Shen" are also the learning difficulties of foreign students. This paper makes a detailed and in-depth analysis of the spatial adjective "Shen" by using the relevant theories of cognitive linguistics. Try to solve the following questions: (1) what are the meanings of "deep"? What are the metonymy and metonymy phenomena between them? What is the path of metaphor and metonymy? (2) what are the adjectives with "deep" family resemblance? What are the semantic similarities and differences between "Shen" and members of the same family? (3) what are the characteristics of "deep" in word formation and syntax? (4) what are the symmetries and asymmetries between "deep" and "shallow"? What are the motivations of these phenomena? (5) what are the similarities and differences between "Shen" in Chinese and "kipta" in Korean? the full text is divided into seven parts: the first part is an introduction, which introduces the reason, theoretical basis, research methods and the general situation of previous studies. The second part and the third part make a detailed analysis of the spatial category "deep" from the perspective of cognition, and systematically discuss the basic meaning, metonymy meaning and metaphorical meaning of "deep". Then the similarities and differences between Shen and other members of similar adjectives with similar semantics are investigated. The fourth part discusses the characteristics of deep in word formation and syntax. The fifth part discusses the symmetry and asymmetry of "depth" and "shallow". In the sixth part, the author compares Chinese "Shen" with Korean "kipta" and examines their similarities and differences in spatial metaphors. The seventh part is the conclusion. The innovations of this paper are as follows: (1) the following five points: (1) A systematic analysis of the semantic meaning of "Shen" is carried out. By refining the semantic characteristics of its basic meaning, it reveals the basic meaning to the metaphorical meaning and the basic meaning to the metaphorical meaning. The semantic extension path from metaphorical meaning to metaphorical meaning (2) this paper finds out the congenial adjectives which are close to the meaning of "deep", and reveals the differences between "deep" and them in semantic and pragmatic terms. And the relationship among the members of these congenial adjectives (3) using the concept of dimension and the semantic characteristics of "deep", This paper summarizes the rules of word formation of "Shen" and other monosyllabic adjectives. (4) the symmetry and asymmetry of "deep" and "shallow" are described comprehensively. In this paper, a reasonable explanation is given. (5) the semantic and grammatical features of "Shen" and "kipta" are compared and analyzed. On this basis, we use synaesthesia metaphor to give a cognitive explanation. The value of this paper lies in the systematic analysis of individual adjectives by: (1). (2) the study of this paper is not only a case study of "deep" as a single adjective, The research ideas and achievements can be extended to the whole category of spatial adjectives. (3) the study of "deep" in Chinese can provide a reference for the typology of spatial adjectives. The research results of word formation and syntax can provide theoretical basis for the current teaching of Chinese as a foreign language.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：北京語言大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2009
【分類號】：H146

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 伍瑩;;漢語維度形容詞“深、淺”語義特征分析[J];黃岡師范學(xué)院學(xué)報;2013年04期

2 王娟;;探索認(rèn)知語言學(xué)下的漢語多義詞[J];劍南文學(xué)(經(jīng)典教苑);2013年08期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 閔子;韓漢空間維度詞對比研究[D];延邊大學(xué);2012年

2 伍瑩;現(xiàn)代漢語空間維度形容詞語義系統(tǒng)研究[D];武漢大學(xué);2011年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 趙彬杉;韓中空間形容詞‘（？）’和‘深/淺’的語義對比[D];延邊大學(xué);2012年

2 沈瑩;空間形容詞“高”的語義認(rèn)知研究[D];上海外國語大學(xué);2012年

3 趙雅青;“高/深+N”的組配及語義對接的管控[D];華中師范大學(xué);2011年

4 程麗麗;英漢垂直方位詞隱喻化對比研究[D];曲阜師范大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號：2004119