【摘要】：隨著基礎(chǔ)教育課程改革的全面推行,在新版《課程標(biāo)準(zhǔn)》(2011版)的指導(dǎo)下,教育部對(duì)初中《科學(xué)》教材、初中《物理》教材進(jìn)行了同步的修改和完善,于2012年秋季學(xué)期正式推廣使用。本研究選取在初中科學(xué)課改試驗(yàn)區(qū)中,使用范圍較為廣泛的“浙教版”初中《科學(xué)》教材的物理部分與“人教版”初中《物理》教材做為比較對(duì)象,旨在通過(guò)比較研究,促進(jìn)兩版教材的優(yōu)勢(shì)互補(bǔ),推進(jìn)物理教材的豐富和發(fā)展,為基礎(chǔ)教育課程改革貢獻(xiàn)一己之力。本研究,采用文獻(xiàn)法、比較法,分析綜合法等科學(xué)研究方法,在宏觀上,對(duì)這兩個(gè)不同版本的教材在課程標(biāo)準(zhǔn)、編排結(jié)構(gòu)、欄目設(shè)置、圖片設(shè)計(jì)、習(xí)題配置等方面進(jìn)行比較分析,分析兩版本教材的特色和不足,提出了教材編寫上值得商榷的地方。在微觀上,選取兩版本教材中的案例,從“問(wèn)題解決策略”的“策略準(zhǔn)備、策略實(shí)施和策略運(yùn)用”等角度進(jìn)行比較研究,分析教材與《課標(biāo)》的吻合度。通過(guò)比較研究,發(fā)現(xiàn)與“浙教版”相比,“人教版”教材的編寫與新版《課程標(biāo)準(zhǔn)》的吻合度不高。在教材編寫上值得商榷的地方是:1.“人教版”教材⑴以活動(dòng)取代知識(shí)陳述的繁冗。⑵增加教材趣味性。⑶降低課后習(xí)題難度。⑷增加科學(xué)方法指導(dǎo);2.“浙教版”科學(xué)教材物理部分⑴知識(shí)體系分散,不利于教學(xué)。⑵活動(dòng)偏多,個(gè)別實(shí)驗(yàn)難度大。⑶缺乏知識(shí)與過(guò)程的統(tǒng)一。
[Abstract]:With the overall implementation of the curriculum reform of basic education, under the guidance of the new edition of Curriculum Standards (2011 Edition), the Ministry of Education has revised and perfected the junior high school "Science" textbooks and the junior high school "Physics" textbooks simultaneously. In the fall of 2012 semester officially promote the use. The purpose of this study is to compare the physics part of the "Zhejiang Education Edition" junior middle school "Science" textbook with the "Man Education Edition" junior middle school "physics" textbook in the experimental area of junior middle school science curriculum reform. Promote the complementary advantages of the two editions of teaching materials, promote the enrichment and development of physical teaching materials, contribute to the curriculum reform of basic education. In this study, scientific research methods, such as literature method, comparative method, comprehensive analysis method and so on, are adopted. On the macro level, the two different versions of textbooks are designed in curriculum standard, arrangement structure, column setting, picture design, etc. This paper makes a comparative analysis on the assignment of exercises, analyzes on the characteristics and shortcomings of the two versions of the textbooks, and puts forward some points for discussion on the compilation of the textbooks. On the micro level, this paper selects the case of the two versions of the textbook, and makes a comparative study from the angles of "strategy preparation, strategy implementation and strategy application" of "problem solving Strategy", and analyzes the consistency between the textbook and the Curriculum Standard. Through the comparative study, it is found that the compilation of the teaching material of the "Man Education Edition" is not in accord with the new edition of Curriculum Standard compared with the "Zhejiang Education Edition". The problem with the compilation of textbooks is that of 1: 1. "people's Education Edition" textbook 1 replaced by activities knowledge statement. 2. Increase the interest of the textbook. 3 reduce the difficulty of after-class exercises. 4 increase the scientific method of guidance. 2. The physical part 1 of the science teaching material of Zhejiang Education Edition is scattered, which is not conducive to teaching .2 activities, and individual experiments lack the unity of knowledge and process.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：貴州師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：G633.7

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 張繼玲;武漢市初中科學(xué)課程實(shí)施現(xiàn)狀分析與建議[D];華中師范大學(xué);2008年

2 劉震飛;香港、新加坡和美國(guó)的中學(xué)物理教材研究[D];華東師范大學(xué);2008年

，

本文編號(hào)：2207951