【摘要】：語文教材是聯(lián)系教師與學(xué)生之間的關(guān)系紐帶,它是語文教育的重要載體,是實(shí)現(xiàn)課程標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的重要載體,語文教材的優(yōu)劣直接影響教育教學(xué)的效果。所以,在歷次語文教育大討論中語文教材都成為爭論的聚焦點(diǎn)。隨著語文教育改革的深入,編寫一套既適合學(xué)生成長、教師好教、學(xué)生樂學(xué)、科學(xué)有效的語文教材,是教育工作者尤其教材編者的神圣使命。鑒于教材體系的復(fù)雜、論文的篇幅有限,筆者重點(diǎn)選取現(xiàn)行語文版初中語文教材的中國現(xiàn)當(dāng)代散文來研究。本文通過比較原文到教材的不同,分析其差異原因,辨明其課文刪節(jié)、修改的得失與是非。在比較分析中發(fā)現(xiàn),其中不乏恰當(dāng)?shù)膭h改,細(xì)細(xì)品味后發(fā)現(xiàn)可為原作品錦上添花,同時(shí)還把作品深刻的藝術(shù)思想內(nèi)涵更為生動(dòng)傳神地表達(dá)出來。而其中教材編者出于教學(xué)目的、價(jià)值導(dǎo)向原因?qū)υ髁溯^大幅度的刪改,也有很多不當(dāng)?shù)膭h改,損害很多作品的文學(xué)性,嚴(yán)重影響學(xué)生對原作原汁原味的閱讀。而后,本文對教材進(jìn)行審視,提出應(yīng)盡可能保持著作的原貌,以免對學(xué)生語文素養(yǎng)的培養(yǎng)、學(xué)生的閱讀理解能力、審美鑒賞能力的提高等造成嚴(yán)重的影響。接著,根據(jù)《九年義務(wù)教育語文課程標(biāo)準(zhǔn)》的要求,并結(jié)合自己多年的教學(xué)經(jīng)歷和眾多一線教師的呼聲,提出自己中肯的意見和建議。最后,拓展思維,巧用刪改,從而提高中學(xué)語文閱讀教學(xué)地效率。接著,詳細(xì)地分析比較法在中學(xué)語文教學(xué)領(lǐng)域的靈活運(yùn)用及其價(jià)值所在,以更好服務(wù)于中學(xué)語文閱讀教學(xué)。在中學(xué)語文閱讀教學(xué)中,可將原文與課文進(jìn)行比較閱讀,課文與教師課堂臨時(shí)換詞比較閱讀,讓學(xué)生能深入地去發(fā)現(xiàn)文章深刻的思想內(nèi)涵。
[Abstract]:Chinese teaching material is a link between teachers and students, it is an important carrier of Chinese education, is an important carrier to achieve curriculum standards, the advantages and disadvantages of Chinese teaching materials directly affect the effect of education and teaching. Therefore, Chinese teaching materials have become the focus of controversy in all the Chinese education discussions. With the deepening of the reform of Chinese education, it is the sacred mission of educators, especially textbook editors, to compile a set of Chinese teaching materials that are suitable for students' growth, good for teachers to teach, students happy to learn, and scientific and effective. In view of the complexity of the textbook system and the limited length of the thesis, the author focuses on the study of the present Chinese prose of junior high school Chinese teaching materials. By comparing the differences between the original text and the teaching materials, this paper analyzes the reasons for the differences, and identifies the abridgement, the gain and loss of the revision and the right and wrong. In the comparative analysis, it is found that there is no lack of appropriate deletion. After careful taste, it is found that the original works can be added to the cake and the profound artistic connotation of the works can be expressed vividly and vividly at the same time. For the purpose of teaching, the textbook editor has made a great deal of abrogation of the original work because of the value orientation, and there are also many improper deletions, which damage the literariness of many works and seriously affect the students' reading of the original works. Then, this paper examines the teaching materials and puts forward that the original appearance of the works should be kept as far as possible so as to avoid the serious influence on the cultivation of students' Chinese literacy, the students' reading comprehension ability and the improvement of their aesthetic appreciation ability. Then, according to the requirement of "Chinese Curriculum Standard of Nine-year compulsory Education", combined with many years of teaching experience and the voice of many front-line teachers, the author puts forward his own pertinent opinions and suggestions. Finally, expand thinking, skillfully use delete, so as to improve the efficiency of Chinese reading teaching. Then, the paper analyzes the flexible application of comparative method in middle school Chinese teaching and its value in order to better serve the teaching of Chinese reading in middle school. In the middle school Chinese reading teaching, the original text and the text can be compared with the text, and the text can be read in a temporary way with the teacher, so that the students can find out the profound ideological connotation of the article.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：福建師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：G633.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 王文斐;;陸蠡散文《囚綠記》解讀[J];長江大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2012年09期

2 張俊列;;怎樣看待語文教材爭議[J];上海教育科研;2011年08期

3 夏崢嶸;劉豐云;周仲愛;;自由體驗(yàn)、自然生成——《西花廳的海棠花又開了》課堂實(shí)錄和點(diǎn)評(píng)[J];教師;2008年11期

4 史習(xí)江;語文版教材簡介[J];中學(xué)語文教學(xué);2004年12期

5 徐龍年;略談魯迅作品中的幾種語言現(xiàn)象[J];麗水師范�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2003年04期

6 余光中;論朱自清的散文[J];名作欣賞;1992年02期

7 劉國正;葉圣陶關(guān)于編寫中學(xué)語文教材的論述[J];課程.教材.教法;1983年03期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 馬文杰;長春版初中語文教材現(xiàn)當(dāng)代散文選文研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2013年

2 林銀;審視人教版高中《必修》中國現(xiàn)代散文的刪改[D];福建師范大學(xué);2012年

3 張冰;四套初中語文教材選文系統(tǒng)比較研究[D];東北師范大學(xué);2012年

4 王珊珊;新課標(biāo)下人教版初中語文教科書選文分析[D];山東師范大學(xué);2012年

5 雷圣艷;語文教材中的老舍作品與研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號(hào)：2179604