2001與2011版義務教育音樂課程標準比較研究
發(fā)布時間：2018-07-21 10:23
【摘要】：音樂課程標準是國家教育部門根據我國的音樂教育實際編訂綱領性文件,是對音樂課程教學與學習的基本要求。它是音樂教材編寫的依據,對音樂教學的設計及評價有著指導性的意義。音樂課程標準中所涉及的音樂課程的性質、理念、內容的基本要求以及教學評價是基礎音樂教育的靈魂。長期以來我國教育部門都在不斷地、努力的制定高質量的音樂課程標準。從我國的基本教育實際出發(fā),借鑒了蘇聯(lián)、美國等音樂教育發(fā)展較好的一些國家的教育制度和課程設置進行我國音樂課程標準的改革。本文重點將從比較的角度對2001年印制的《全日制義務教育音樂課程標準(實驗稿)》(以下簡稱“實驗稿”)和2011年編訂的《義務教育音樂課程標準》(以下簡稱“新課標”)進行詳細、系統(tǒng)的對比,從而得出結論。本文的主要內容包括:緒論、我國義務教育音樂課程標準的歷史發(fā)展、我國2001與2011年兩個版本的課標的比較、新課標的爭鳴與反思、研究結論與綜合討論五個部分的內容。在本文最后還將作者的一些疑問與反思以及本研究存在的問題與不足之處。
[Abstract]:The standard of music curriculum is a programmatic document compiled by the national education department according to the actual situation of music education in our country, and it is the basic requirement for the teaching and learning of music curriculum. It is the basis for the compilation of music teaching materials and has a guiding significance for the design and evaluation of music teaching. The nature, idea, content and teaching evaluation of the music curriculum involved in the music curriculum standard are the soul of the basic music education. For a long time, our education departments have been working hard to establish high-quality music curriculum standards. Starting from the reality of basic education in our country, this paper draws lessons from the educational system and curriculum setup of some countries with better development of music education, such as the Soviet Union and the United States, and carries out the reform of the music curriculum standards of our country. This article will focus on the "full-time compulsory education music curriculum standards (experimental draft)" published in 2001 (hereinafter referred to as "experimental draft") and the "compulsory education music curriculum standards" (hereinafter referred to as "the new") compiled in 2011. For details, The comparison of the system, so as to draw a conclusion. The main contents of this paper are as follows: introduction, the historical development of the music curriculum standard of compulsory education in China, the comparison between the two versions of the curriculum standard in 2001 and 2011, the contending and reflection of the new curriculum standard, and the conclusion and comprehensive discussion of the five parts. At the end of this paper, some questions and reflections of the author as well as the problems and shortcomings of this study are also discussed.
【學位授予單位】：云南師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：G633.951
本文編號：2135214
[Abstract]:The standard of music curriculum is a programmatic document compiled by the national education department according to the actual situation of music education in our country, and it is the basic requirement for the teaching and learning of music curriculum. It is the basis for the compilation of music teaching materials and has a guiding significance for the design and evaluation of music teaching. The nature, idea, content and teaching evaluation of the music curriculum involved in the music curriculum standard are the soul of the basic music education. For a long time, our education departments have been working hard to establish high-quality music curriculum standards. Starting from the reality of basic education in our country, this paper draws lessons from the educational system and curriculum setup of some countries with better development of music education, such as the Soviet Union and the United States, and carries out the reform of the music curriculum standards of our country. This article will focus on the "full-time compulsory education music curriculum standards (experimental draft)" published in 2001 (hereinafter referred to as "experimental draft") and the "compulsory education music curriculum standards" (hereinafter referred to as "the new") compiled in 2011. For details, The comparison of the system, so as to draw a conclusion. The main contents of this paper are as follows: introduction, the historical development of the music curriculum standard of compulsory education in China, the comparison between the two versions of the curriculum standard in 2001 and 2011, the contending and reflection of the new curriculum standard, and the conclusion and comprehensive discussion of the five parts. At the end of this paper, some questions and reflections of the author as well as the problems and shortcomings of this study are also discussed.
【學位授予單位】：云南師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：G633.951
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前8條
1 趙慈琳;;音樂教育哲學的批判性思考——《音樂問題——新的音樂教育哲學》基本觀念解讀[J];人民音樂;2009年10期
2 李飛飛;尹愛青;;音樂教育哲學:轉向與反思[J];人民音樂;2011年06期
3 劉沛;音樂教育哲學觀點的歷史演進——兼論多維度音樂課程價值及邏輯起點[J];中國音樂;2004年04期
4 管建華;;“審美為核心的音樂教育”哲學批評與音樂教育的文化哲學建構[J];中國音樂;2005年04期
5 崔學榮;;兼容的音樂教育哲學觀——基礎音樂教育實踐的行動指南[J];中國音樂;2008年02期
6 夏嵐;;實施有效教學策略 優(yōu)化音樂課堂教學[J];鎮(zhèn)江高專學報;2012年04期
7 尚建科;;在眾聲喧嘩中重構音樂教育哲學——韋恩·鮑曼著《音樂的哲學視野》述評[J];中國音樂;2013年03期
8 鮑麗;;淺論普通高校音樂教育對提高大學生素質的作用[J];音樂天地;2010年10期
相關碩士學位論文 前2條
1 莊仕鵬;我國七套初中實驗音樂教科書之內容分析[D];華東師范大學;2011年
2 白艷群;音樂教學中自主性評價理論與實踐研究[D];首都師范大學;2006年
，本文編號：2135214
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/jiaoyulunwen/chuzhongjiaoyu/2135214.html
