本文選題：公平 + 高考��； 參考：《陜西師范大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：高考加分政策目的在于維護(hù)高考公平正義,給處在弱勢(shì)或具有特殊才能的考生予以補(bǔ)償和鼓勵(lì)。但自2004年至今高考體育加分造假愈演愈烈,這也使得高考體育加分政策遭人詬病。2004.6.25《南方周末》曝光西安市高考體育加分造假；2006.6.14《中國(guó)青年報(bào)》曝光湖南省高考體育加分造假；2007-2009《中國(guó)青年報(bào)》連續(xù)三年曝光浙江省高考體育加分造假；2010年廈門國(guó)際馬拉松賽曝出多名高中生作弊丑聞,而他們都是沖著二級(jí)運(yùn)動(dòng)員證來的；2014年遼寧省本溪市高級(jí)中學(xué)和河南省漯河市高級(jí)中學(xué)被曝高考體育加分存在造假行為。針對(duì)目前高考體育加分造假事件的不斷發(fā)生,教育部為了徹底杜絕高考體育、藝術(shù)加分造假,于2014年9月4號(hào)頒布了《國(guó)務(wù)院關(guān)于深化考試招生制度改革的實(shí)施意見》,其中在“改革招生錄取機(jī)制”第一條便明確指出大幅減少高考加分項(xiàng)目和嚴(yán)格控制高考加分項(xiàng)目數(shù)量,并從2015年開始取消高考體育與藝術(shù)等特長(zhǎng)生加分政策。高考體育加分政策從出臺(tái)實(shí)施到現(xiàn)在己發(fā)展了30多年,它對(duì)維護(hù)高考公平正義、破除唯分?jǐn)?shù)論、促進(jìn)我國(guó)素質(zhì)教育和體育事業(yè)的發(fā)展起到了至關(guān)重要的作用。雖然它在近年發(fā)展中出現(xiàn)了諸多問題,但它在當(dāng)下社會(huì)中依然有存在的必要,如今國(guó)家取消高考體育加分政策,未免有因噎廢食之嫌,有損高考公平正義。因此本文以高考體育加分政策為研究對(duì)象,以維護(hù)和促進(jìn)高考的公平和正義為出發(fā)點(diǎn),對(duì)于促進(jìn)教育公平和社會(huì)公平具有現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。論文分為五部分：第一部分,主要闡述了本題研究背景、研究目的、研究意義、研究方法,并對(duì)目前我國(guó)高考加分政策研究現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行綜述。第二部分,首先對(duì)高考公平的內(nèi)涵和屬性進(jìn)行闡述；其次對(duì)高考體育加分政策的相關(guān)概念進(jìn)行界定；最后對(duì)高考加分政策公平性的判斷原則進(jìn)行分析,主要從個(gè)體層面和群體層面進(jìn)行論述。第三部分,一對(duì)高考體育加分政策的發(fā)展歷程進(jìn)行概述：我國(guó)高考體育加分政策分為三個(gè)階段,第一階段為高考體育加分政策確立階段(1983年-2000年)；第二階段為高考體育加分政策的異化發(fā)展階段(2001年-2010年)；第三階段為高考體育加分政策終結(jié)階段(2010年-2014年)。二分析高考體育加分政策的特點(diǎn)。三對(duì)我國(guó)高考體育加分政策的理論基礎(chǔ)及加分對(duì)象的公平性進(jìn)行分析。四提出取消高考體育加分政策不合理及原因：(1)高考體育加分政策推動(dòng)我國(guó)素質(zhì)教育發(fā)展彌補(bǔ)唯分?jǐn)?shù)論弊端；(2)高考體育加分政策有利于引導(dǎo)學(xué)生鍛煉增強(qiáng)學(xué)生身體素質(zhì)；(3)高考體育加分政策有利于促進(jìn)我國(guó)體育后備人才多元化的培養(yǎng)；(4)高水平運(yùn)動(dòng)員成才周期長(zhǎng),訓(xùn)練艱苦應(yīng)給與多種導(dǎo)向激勵(lì)。第四部分,首先分析現(xiàn)階段高考體育加分政策所面臨的問題；其次分析根本原因,筆者歸類為兩點(diǎn)：高考體育加分政策本身的原因和社會(huì)原因。政策本身原因有：(1)政策的制定方面；(2)政策的實(shí)施方面；(3)政策的監(jiān)督問責(zé)方面。社會(huì)原因有：(1)考試文化的影響；(2)高考的附加功能；(3)分省定額錄取政策；(4)社會(huì)階層的復(fù)制性；(5)考試法不健全等。第五部分,針對(duì)高考體育加分政策面臨的問題提出相應(yīng)的改進(jìn)對(duì)策和建議：(1)從高考政策的制定、實(shí)施、以及監(jiān)督三方面進(jìn)行；(2)加快出臺(tái)有關(guān)高考的專門法案；(3)建立高考政策的公平規(guī)則體系。
[Abstract]:The purpose of the high - entrance examination plus separation policy is to maintain the fairness and justice of the college entrance examination , to compensate and encourage candidates who are in a weak or special ability . However , since 2004 , there has been a growing number of college entrance examinations .
2006 - Jun . 14 The Chinese Youth Daily exposed Hunan University Entrance Examination Sports Add - off ;
In 2007 - 2009 , China Youth Daily gave a continuous three - year exposure to Zhejiang University Entrance Examination Sports Add - off ;
In 2010 , Xiamen International Marathon has exposed many high school students to cheating scandals , and they are all rushed to secondary players .
In order to improve the fairness and justice of college entrance examination , the author points out that there is a great deal of problems in the development of college entrance examination .
Secondly , it defines the related concepts of the high - entrance examination sports plus - separation policy ;
At last , the author analyses the principle of judging the fairness of the gaokao ' s policy , mainly from the individual level and the group level . In the third part , the author gives an overview of the development course of the high - entrance examination sports plus - score policy : the first stage is the stage of the high - entrance examination sports plus - score policy ( 1983 - 2000 ) ;
The second stage is the differentiation and development stage ( 2001 - 2010 ) of the high - entrance examination sports plus - separation policy ;
The third stage is the final stage of college entrance examination ( 2010 - 2014 ) .
( 2 ) The high school entrance examination sports bonus policy is beneficial to guide the students to exercise and strengthen the students ' physical quality ;
( 3 ) To promote the diversification of sports reserve talents in China ;
( 4 ) The long period of the high - level athletes , and the training and hardship should be given various guide incentives . The fourth part , firstly , analyzes the problems faced by the current high - level college entrance examination and separation policy ;
Secondly , the basic reason is analyzed , and the author classifies it as two points : the reason and the social reason of the policy itself . The reasons of the policy are : ( 1 ) the formulation of the policy ;
( 2 ) the implementation of the policy ;
( 3 ) The social reasons include : ( 1 ) the impact of the examination culture ;
( 2 ) the supplementary function of college entrance examination ;
( 3 ) the quota enrollment policy of the province ;
( 4 ) the replicability of the social stratum ;
( 5 ) The examination law is not perfect , etc . The fifth part puts forward corresponding countermeasures and suggestions on the problems faced by the high school entrance examination policy : ( 1 ) from the formulation , implementation and supervision of the examination policy ;
( 2 ) To expedite the introduction of a special bill on the examination of college entrance examination ;
( 3 ) To establish the fair rules system of the policy of college entrance examination .
【學(xué)位授予單位】：陜西師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：G633.96

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 崔華華;方美;;對(duì)我國(guó)高考加分政策的理性分析及思考[J];高教探索;2010年03期

2 顏色盛;李美霞;;高考加分政策對(duì)比與探析[J];中國(guó)考試;2014年01期

，

本文編號(hào)：1979700