本文選題：專家型教師 + 新手型教師��； 參考：《安徽師范大學》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：近些年來,語文新課程改革取得了突破,課堂教學評價成為語文教育界改革的新核心。語文新課程標準中建立了新的評價理念,語文課堂評價語言作為課堂教學評價的新切入點,值得深入研究。本文采取與家—新手對照比較的方式,綜合應用文獻法、問卷調查法、訪談法和觀察法,對與家型教師不新手型教師的語文課堂評價語言進行了比較分析,主要從重視程度、使用情況、反思研究這三方面展開。從整體上看,語文與家型教師的課堂評價語言要優(yōu)于語文新手型教師。我們認為這兩類教師在語言素養(yǎng)、評價觀念、教學能力、反思情況這四個方面存在差異,這些差異造成了語文課堂評價語言的丌同。對此,語文新手教師需要提高語言素養(yǎng),樹立語文課堂的新型評價理念,講究語文課堂語言評價的技巧,進行積極的反思。學校、教育行政部門則可以從制定考核機制、品評標準、加強培訓等方面,為語文新手型教師課堂評價語言的發(fā)展提供動力不支持。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the new Chinese curriculum reform has made a breakthrough, classroom teaching evaluation has become the new core of the reform of Chinese education.The new evaluation concept has been established in the new Chinese curriculum standard. As a new breakthrough point of classroom teaching evaluation, Chinese classroom evaluation language is worthy of further study.In this paper, a comparative analysis of the Chinese classroom evaluation language of non-novice teachers with homeschoolers is carried out by means of comprehensive application of literature, questionnaire, interview and observation.Use the situation, reflect on the three aspects of the study.On the whole, the classroom evaluation language of Chinese and home-based teachers is superior to that of novice teachers.We think that there are differences between the two kinds of teachers in four aspects: language literacy, evaluation concept, teaching ability and reflection. These differences result in the different language of Chinese classroom evaluation.In view of this, new Chinese teachers need to improve their language literacy, set up a new evaluation concept of Chinese classroom, pay attention to the skills of language evaluation in Chinese classroom, and carry on positive reflection.Schools and educational administrative departments can make assessment mechanism, evaluate standards, strengthen training and so on, and provide no support for the development of Chinese novice teachers' classroom evaluation language.
【學位授予單位】：安徽師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：G633.3

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 尤升旗;課堂評價,怎一個“好”字了得[J];人民教育;2003年11期

2 錢瑛;教師課堂評價的三種“過于”[J];黑龍江教育(小學版);2003年27期

3 鞏同霞;;改進數學課堂評價方式的實踐探索[J];小學教育科研論壇;2003年Z1期

4 郭文勇;課堂評價應關注學生的學習狀態(tài)[J];環(huán)渤海經濟w，

本文編號：1756888