本文選題：四川高考 + 化學(xué)試題��； 參考：《四川師范大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：二十世紀九十年代以來,基于課程標準的教育改革興起,眾多學(xué)者對學(xué)業(yè)評價與課程標準的一致性研究給予更多關(guān)注。國外在一致性研究方面取得了很大進展,開發(fā)出多種評價模式,運用較廣泛的評價模式主要有Webb分析模式、Achieve分析模式和SEC分析模式。我國于2001年正式實施基于課程標準的教育改革,根據(jù)共同的課程標準出版了多個版本的教材,呈現(xiàn)出百家爭鳴的現(xiàn)象。在學(xué)業(yè)評價方面我國主要采取紙筆考試的形式對學(xué)生進行考查,最重要、最權(quán)威的學(xué)業(yè)評價考試就是每年六月份的高考,我國高考是基于共同的課程標準的,但是考試內(nèi)容卻各不相同,眾多省市采取獨立命題的形式,但是各省市高考試題考查的內(nèi)容是否與課程標準相一致呢?試題體現(xiàn)出課程標準的要求了嗎?又在多大程度上體現(xiàn)了課程標準的要求呢?自2004年新高考以來,已有部分專家針對不同省市高考與課程標準的一致性展開了相關(guān)研究,本文以四川省2011年至2014年的四年高考理綜試卷化學(xué)試題為研究對象,運用SEC分析模式分析出歷年試題與課程標準的一致性情況。本研究將從以下五個部分進行論述:第一部分:問題的提出,主要論述研究背景、研究目的及意義、研究內(nèi)容、方法、思路與步驟等內(nèi)容。對研究的國內(nèi)外背景做了詳細的分析,從而得出研究高考試題與課程標準一致性的原因、研究的目的和意義,進一步闡明研究的主要內(nèi)容、思路、方法等,并對相關(guān)概念做了界定。第二部分:研究綜述,從“對化學(xué)高考試題的研究”及“高考試題與課程標準一致性”兩個方面進行綜述。第一個方面是針對高考試題的研究,從定性或定量的角度對一年或幾年試題進行研究的相關(guān)情況;第二個方面闡述有關(guān)一致性研究的總體情況。第三部分:研究的理論基礎(chǔ),主要闡述了本研究所應(yīng)用的美國“SEC分析模式”,及布盧姆目標分類理論。第四部分:高考化學(xué)試題與課程標準的一致性分析,通過對課程標準和四川省近四年來的高考理綜卷化學(xué)試題進行二維編碼,并用一致性分析工具分析二者一致性,運用柱狀分析圖及二維曲面圖進行具體分析。第五部分:課題研究的結(jié)論、反思與展望。通過研究得出以下結(jié)論:1.近四年來四川省高考化學(xué)試題與課程標準的一致性系數(shù)平均值為0.441,兩者之間不存在統(tǒng)計學(xué)上顯著的一致性;2.在內(nèi)容維度上兩者之間存在較大差異,試題的內(nèi)容覆蓋率較低;3.在認知水平方面兩者基本一致。同時,本章還分析了影響兩者一致性的因素,提出相應(yīng)建議,并對本研究進行展望,提出該課題深入進行的方向建議。
[Abstract]:Since the 1990s, educational reform based on curriculum standards has emerged. Many scholars pay more attention to the consistency of academic evaluation and curriculum standards.Abroad, great progress has been made in the research of consistency. A variety of evaluation models have been developed. The most widely used evaluation models are the Webb analysis model and the SEC analysis model.In 2001, China formally implemented the educational reform based on curriculum standards. According to the common curriculum standards, several versions of teaching materials were published, showing the phenomenon of a hundred schools of thought contending.In terms of academic evaluation, our country mainly takes the form of paper and pen examinations to examine students. The most important and authoritative academic evaluation test is the National entrance examination in June each year. The national college entrance examination is based on the common curriculum standards.However, the content of the examination is different, many provinces and cities adopt the form of independent proposition, but whether the content of the examination of the college entrance examination is consistent with the curriculum standard?Does the test question reflect the requirements of the curriculum standard?To what extent does it reflect the requirements of curriculum standards?Since the new college entrance examination in 2004, some experts have carried out related research on the consistency of college entrance examination and curriculum standard in different provinces and cities. This paper takes the chemistry test of the four-year college entrance examination paper in Sichuan Province from 2011 to 2014 as the research object.The consistency between the test questions and the curriculum standard is analyzed by using the SEC analysis model.This research will be discussed from the following five parts: the first part: the question raised, mainly discusses the research background, research purpose and significance, research content, methods, ideas and steps.This paper makes a detailed analysis of the domestic and foreign background of the study, and then obtains the reasons for the consistency between the research questions and the curriculum standards, the purpose and significance of the research, and further clarifies the main contents, ideas, methods, etc.And has made the definition to the related concept.The second part: a summary of the research, from two aspects: the study of chemical college entrance examination questions and the consistency of the college entrance examination questions and curriculum standards.The first aspect is the related situation of a year or several years examination questions from the qualitative or quantitative point of view for the study of the college entrance examination questions; the second aspect expounds the general situation of the consistency research.The third part: the theoretical basis of the research, mainly elaborated the American "SEC analysis model", and Bloom target classification theory.The fourth part: the consistency analysis of college entrance examination chemistry examination questions and curriculum standards, through the course standard and Sichuan province in the past four years of comprehensive chemistry examination of the college entrance examination questions of two-dimensional coding, using consistency analysis tools to analyze the consistency between the two.The concrete analysis is carried out by using cylindrical analysis and two-dimensional curved surface.The fifth part: the conclusion, reflection and prospect of the research.The following conclusion is drawn from the study: 1.In the last four years, the average consistency coefficient between the chemistry test and the curriculum standard of Sichuan college entrance examination is 0.441.There is no statistically significant consistency between the two.In the content dimension, there is a big difference between the two, the content coverage of the test questions is lower than 3. 5%.In terms of cognitive level, the two are basically the same.At the same time, this chapter also analyzes the factors that affect the consistency of the two, puts forward the corresponding suggestions, and prospects the research, and puts forward the direction of the research.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：四川師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：G633.8

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 崔允o7;夏雪梅;;試論基于課程標準的學(xué)生學(xué)業(yè)成就評價[J];課程.教材.教法;2007年01期

2 焦少珍;陳淳;;2009年課改實驗區(qū)高考生物試卷與課程標準的一致性研究[J];教育測量與評價(理論版);2010年05期

3 崔允o7,沈蘭華;澳大利亞維多利亞州《課程標準框架》述評[J];外國教育資料;2000年01期

4 胡慶芳;從美國新課程標準運動看測試與標準匹配的策略[J];外國中小學(xué)教育;2004年10期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 李嫩;化學(xué)課程標準與上海中考化學(xué)試題的一致性研究[D];上海師范大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號：1756444