公司治理、經理人動機與費用粘性關系研究
[Abstract]:Cost (cost) management is an important part of enterprise management. The study of (cost behavior) habit of cost (cost) is helpful for internal managers to make cost-cost decisions and external investors and related institutions for enterprise performance prediction. As a manifestation of cost habit, the study of fee stickiness (cost stickiness) is rooted in the consideration of whether the decision made by managers based on traditional cost habit model is sufficiently accurate. The starting point of this paper is based on the influence of managers on the cost stickiness, how to motivate managers to carry out more active cost management and restrict their negative cost decisions. The manager's expense decision is related to the success or failure of the enterprise. However, the manager's motivation is the real driving force behind the cost decision, and there is an inevitable relationship between the manager's different motivation and the expense habit. The original intention of corporate governance design is to realize shareholders' supervision and balance to managers. Therefore, this paper studies the relationship between corporate governance, manager motivation and expense stickiness, and clarifies the influence path of different managers' motivation on expense behavior. It provides a more comprehensive theoretical guidance for the performance appraisal of managers through the expense ratio, and it also provides a more comprehensive theoretical guidance on how to strengthen corporate governance to restrict managers' self-interest motivation and thus alleviate the agency problem. How to strengthen the cost control to improve the value of the company has practical significance. On the basis of reviewing and reviewing the theoretical basis of this study and the domestic and foreign literatures on the characteristics of fee viscosity, causes, influencing factors and its economic consequences, Based on the theoretical analysis of the causes and influencing factors of the cost stickiness, this paper first studies the influence of three different motivations on the cost stickiness: the managers' optimal decision motive, the earnings management motivation and the self-interest motive. The optimal decision motivation of managers will lead to a higher level of cost stickiness; the cost symmetry of the sample company with earnings protection motivation is more obvious, while that of the company with new stock issuing motivation shows the characteristics of anti-stickiness. Managers' self-interest motivation has a positive effect on the level of expense stickiness. Specifically, M & A is the prerequisite for the implementation of managers' self-interest motivation. Sufficient free cash flow and long tenure of manager are the necessary conditions for managers' self-interest motivation, and the increase of variable proportion in manager's salary structure will stimulate the implementation of manager's self-interest motivation. These factors have a significant positive effect on the cost viscosity. Secondly, this paper examines the restriction effect of corporate governance on managers' self-interest motivation. The research shows that higher corporate governance intensity is beneficial to restrain managers' self-interest motivation, thus reducing the expense stickiness formed by managers' self-interest motivation. Improve the value of the company, and the low level of corporate governance companies, managers more obvious self-interest motivation, relatively high cost stickiness. Furthermore, the cost stickiness formed by the manager under the optimal decision motive will send a positive signal to the growth of the company's value, while the expense stickiness formed under the self-interest motive shows the low efficiency of the expense management. Will send a negative signal to the growth of the company's value. Finally, the conclusion of this paper is given, and some policy suggestions are given for Chinese enterprise managers to make scientific and reasonable cost management decisions.
【學位授予單位】:天津大學
【學位級別】:博士
【學位授予年份】:2013
【分類號】:F271;F275
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 陳慶勇;韓立巖;;上市公司對外并購中高管薪酬變動實證研究[J];北京航空航天大學學報(社會科學版);2008年01期
2 杜勇;陳建英;;企業(yè)成本管理方法研究綜述[J];商業(yè)研究;2007年02期
3 徐曉東;張?zhí)煳?;公司治理、自由現(xiàn)金流與非效率投資[J];財經研究;2009年10期
4 孫錚,王躍堂;資源配置與盈余操縱之實證研究[J];財經研究;1999年04期
5 陳燦平;;企業(yè)費用“粘性”行為影響因素研究——基于地區(qū)經濟生態(tài)差異視角[J];財經理論與實踐;2008年06期
6 曹曉雪;于長春;周澤將;;費用“粘性”研究:來自中央企業(yè)的經驗證據(jù)[J];產業(yè)經濟研究;2009年01期
7 胡建平;干勝道;;自由現(xiàn)金流量的代理成本:理論和證據(jù)[J];當代財經;2009年12期
8 劉武;;企業(yè)費用“粘性”行為:基于行業(yè)差異的實證研究[J];中國工業(yè)經濟;2006年12期
9 魏濤;陸正飛;單宏偉;;非經常性損益盈余管理的動機、手段和作用研究——來自中國上市公司的經驗證據(jù)[J];管理世界;2007年01期
10 呂長江;鄭慧蓮;嚴明珠;許靜靜;;上市公司股權激勵制度設計:是激勵還是福利?[J];管理世界;2009年09期
相關博士學位論文 前1條
1 周繼軍;企業(yè)內部控制與管理者代理問題研究[D];華中科技大學;2011年
本文編號:2165585
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/guanlilunwen/chengbenguanlilunwen/2165585.html