本文選題：運(yùn)輸毒品 + 犯罪主體��； 參考：《華南理工大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：運(yùn)輸、走私、制造和販賣毒品罪屬于一個(gè)選擇性的罪名。在國(guó)內(nèi)的《刑法》之中，用這類簡(jiǎn)潔罪狀的形式來(lái)表述運(yùn)輸毒品罪，從立法者的用意來(lái)看，是期望執(zhí)法者可更為全面地發(fā)揮其主觀能動(dòng)性，結(jié)合實(shí)際案情，對(duì)于實(shí)際生活之中多種類型的毒品犯罪進(jìn)行有效處理。但是從實(shí)際成效上看來(lái)，并未獲得理想效果。因?yàn)槎酒愤\(yùn)輸十分繁雜，而且多樣化，該罪的簡(jiǎn)潔化描述以及有關(guān)的司法解釋都讓運(yùn)輸毒品罪更為模糊。由于立法的滯后性，有關(guān)理論研討要想在具體實(shí)踐之中指導(dǎo)認(rèn)定毒品運(yùn)輸犯罪，其難度較大，加上國(guó)內(nèi)的法學(xué)領(lǐng)域?qū)τ谠撟锏难芯枯^為缺乏，存在較大的爭(zhēng)議。所以，對(duì)該罪進(jìn)行研討，具備非常重要的研究?jī)r(jià)值。 理論是服務(wù)于實(shí)踐的，但是在國(guó)內(nèi)目前的司法實(shí)踐過(guò)程之中，對(duì)于運(yùn)輸毒品的不法人員不能平等的對(duì)待，各個(gè)地域所適用的定罪標(biāo)準(zhǔn)也存在差異；案件的性質(zhì)相同，但是，因?yàn)樗玫睦碚摳鶕?jù)存在差別，最終的判決結(jié)果大相庭徑，，刑法之中的正義難以體現(xiàn)。本文從運(yùn)輸毒品罪的司法認(rèn)定著手，在第一章中論述了運(yùn)輸毒品罪的相關(guān)概念和構(gòu)成；第二章闡述了運(yùn)輸毒品罪的主觀明知要素的認(rèn)定，筆者認(rèn)為應(yīng)以主觀和客觀相結(jié)合的準(zhǔn)則來(lái)對(duì)“明知”進(jìn)行判定，不僅要分析行為人自身的認(rèn)知水平，還要對(duì)當(dāng)時(shí)案件發(fā)生的具體情形進(jìn)行分析；第三章探討了運(yùn)輸毒品罪的共同犯罪問(wèn)題，分別就運(yùn)輸毒品罪共同犯罪構(gòu)成、運(yùn)輸毒品罪共犯的認(rèn)定以及形式進(jìn)行了闡述；第四章從運(yùn)輸毒品罪的既遂的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)以及運(yùn)輸毒品罪的預(yù)備與實(shí)行上的劃分兩個(gè)方面論述了運(yùn)輸毒品罪犯罪形態(tài)的認(rèn)定，筆者認(rèn)為需將毒品的流通和完成程度作為判定運(yùn)輸毒品罪既遂的衡量標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。其中，毒品從靜止的狀態(tài)，比如被非法持有、窩藏等變?yōu)檫\(yùn)動(dòng)的狀態(tài)即非法運(yùn)輸。文章通過(guò)對(duì)這四個(gè)方面進(jìn)行探討，有效解決了有關(guān)毒品運(yùn)輸罪一直以來(lái)難以解決的幾大難題，這對(duì)打擊毒品犯罪的囂張氣焰，完善我國(guó)法律體系具有十分深遠(yuǎn)的理論意義和現(xiàn)實(shí)價(jià)值。
[Abstract]:The crime of transporting, smuggling, manufacturing and trafficking in drugs is a selective offence. In the domestic Criminal Law, the expression of the crime of transporting drugs in the form of this kind of simple crime is, from the intention of the legislator, the expectation is that the law enforcers can play their subjective initiative more fully, in the light of the actual circumstances of the case. We should deal with various types of drug crimes in real life effectively. But from the actual effect, did not obtain the ideal effect. Because of the complexity and variety of drug transportation, the concise description of the crime and the related judicial explanation all make the crime of transporting drugs more ambiguous. Due to the lag of legislation, it is difficult for the relevant theoretical research to guide the identification of the crime of drug transportation in the concrete practice. Moreover, the domestic legal field is lack of the research on the crime, and there is a great deal of controversy. Therefore, the study of this crime has very important research value. Theory serves practice, but in the current judicial practice in China, the illegal persons who transport drugs are not treated equally. There are differences in the standard of conviction applied in different regions; the nature of the case is the same, however, because of the differences in the theoretical basis used, the final judgment result is big, so justice in criminal law is difficult to reflect. This article begins with the judicial cognizance of the crime of transporting drugs, in the first chapter, it discusses the related concept and constitution of the crime of transporting drugs, the second chapter expounds the cognizance of the subjective knowing elements of the crime of transporting drugs. The author believes that "knowing" should be judged by combining subjective and objective criteria, not only to analyze the cognitive level of the perpetrator itself, but also to analyze the specific situation of the case at that time. The third chapter discusses the problem of joint crime of the crime of transporting drugs, and expounds the constitution of the joint crime of the crime of transporting drugs, the identification and form of the accomplice of the crime of transporting drugs. The fourth chapter discusses the definition of the crime of transporting drugs from two aspects: the standard of the completion of the crime of transporting drugs and the division of the preparation and practice of the crime of transporting drugs. The author thinks that it is necessary to take the circulation and completion of drugs as the standard to judge the completion of the crime of transporting drugs. Among them, the drug from a static state, such as illegal possession, harbouring and so on into a state of movement, that is, illegal transport. By discussing these four aspects, the article has effectively solved several difficult problems that have been difficult to solve since the crime of drug transportation, which has a great impact on the arrogance of cracking down on drug crimes. Perfecting our country's legal system has profound theoretical significance and practical value.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華南理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D924.3;D926

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 褚福民;;證明困難的解決模式——以毒品犯罪明知為例的分析[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2010年02期

2 張偉良;;運(yùn)輸毒品行為的定性[J];法制與社會(huì);2008年30期

3 高艷東;運(yùn)輸毒品罪疑難問(wèn)題研究[J];廣西政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年06期

4 吳壽澤;;毒品犯罪死刑若干問(wèn)題研究[J];廣西政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年06期

5 沈琳娜;;事實(shí)推定在毒品犯罪中的應(yīng)用[J];湖北警官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年06期

6 袁登明;;毒品純度與毒品犯罪的定罪量刑[J];中國(guó)檢察官;2011年15期

7 白冰;;刑事推定與應(yīng)當(dāng)知道[J];江西警察學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2014年01期

8 張洪成;;毒品犯罪主觀故意認(rèn)定問(wèn)題研究[J];刑法論叢;2012年01期

9 高貴君;竹瑩瑩;;吸毒人員在運(yùn)輸毒品過(guò)程中被查獲的定罪問(wèn)題[J];人民司法;2008年11期

10 郝廷婷;楊中良;;運(yùn)輸毒品主觀上明知的認(rèn)定[J];人民司法;2013年06期

本文編號(hào)：1987625