本文選題：承繼共同正犯 + 限定肯定說�。� 參考：《國家檢察官學(xué)院學(xué)報》2015年04期

【摘要】：厘清承繼共同正犯的責(zé)任范圍不僅有助于解決司法實踐中的問題,而且還能夠?qū)⒃搯栴}與共同犯罪相銜接,蘊含豐富的理論價值。圍繞承繼共同正犯的責(zé)任有全面肯定說、全面否定說以及限定肯定說等不同觀點,各種觀點的理論基礎(chǔ)與司法適用結(jié)果都有較大區(qū)別。通過比較和分析,限定肯定說的觀點更具有科學(xué)性與合理性,不僅貫徹了因果共犯論的主張,也能夠?qū)⑿谭ㄖ械膫�人責(zé)任原則進(jìn)行貫徹。
[Abstract]:To clarify the scope of the responsibility of the joint principal offender is not only helpful to solve the problem in judicial practice, but also can link the problem with the joint crime, which contains rich theoretical value. There are different viewpoints about the responsibility of inheriting the common principal offender, such as overall affirmation theory, total negation theory and limited affirmation theory. The theoretical basis of all kinds of views is different from the result of judicial application. Through comparison and analysis, the viewpoint of defining affirmation is more scientific and reasonable. It not only carries out the proposition of the theory of causality accomplice, but also carries out the principle of individual responsibility in criminal law.
【作者單位】： 黑龍江大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【分類號】：D924.1
，

本文編號：1988019