本文選題：扒竊 + 定罪��； 參考：《中國(guó)海洋大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：扒竊行為入刑給司法實(shí)踐帶來(lái)了許多爭(zhēng)議與困惑。為了解決司法實(shí)踐中對(duì)于扒竊犯罪在定罪方面的難題,首先,需要明確扒竊的概念及特征。扒竊犯罪,是以非法占有他人隨身攜帶的財(cái)物為目的,在公共場(chǎng)所采取和平手段竊取目標(biāo)財(cái)物的行為�？梢�(jiàn)扒竊犯罪具有地點(diǎn)特征、對(duì)象特征和行為特征。其次,需要確立扒竊行為作為盜竊罪入罪的統(tǒng)一、嚴(yán)格的評(píng)判標(biāo)準(zhǔn),避免任意出入罪。所謂扒竊罪是盜竊犯罪的一種特殊的行為方式,既有盜竊犯罪的共性的特點(diǎn),又有其自身的個(gè)性特征。要正確認(rèn)定扒竊罪,應(yīng)從客觀方面、主觀方面、犯罪客體和犯罪主體四個(gè)方面進(jìn)行分析研究。再則,要正確認(rèn)識(shí)扒竊犯罪的既未遂形態(tài),確定扒竊犯罪既遂與未遂的科學(xué)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)應(yīng)當(dāng)是看扒竊的犯罪構(gòu)成要件是否完備,行為人只要財(cái)物到手,扒竊行為即宣告完成,達(dá)到既遂,對(duì)扒竊犯罪而言所盜財(cái)物價(jià)值大小不是本罪的客觀方面要件。最后,要協(xié)調(diào)盜竊犯罪內(nèi)部入罪標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的差別,避免與其他相關(guān)犯罪行為混淆。關(guān)于扒竊犯罪與彼罪的界限。扒竊罪與搶劫罪的區(qū)別主要是看行為人是否為達(dá)到侵害財(cái)產(chǎn)的目的,而對(duì)被害人實(shí)施強(qiáng)力奪取行為；扒竊與搶奪較為類似,二者都具有公然性特征,實(shí)踐中有時(shí)極易混淆。如何將二者區(qū)分,我們可從搶奪行為對(duì)財(cái)物的強(qiáng)力奪取進(jìn)而對(duì)被害人造成人身傷害的可能性方面來(lái)予以區(qū)分；扒竊罪與侵占罪在行為方式和侵害對(duì)象方面有所區(qū)別,前者的行為方式是竊取,是通過(guò)一定手段,將他人的財(cái)物轉(zhuǎn)為自己占有,后者是將自己合法持有的財(cái)物非法轉(zhuǎn)為自己占有：多次盜竊與扒竊二者是包含與被包含的關(guān)系,即多次盜竊包含扒竊,多次實(shí)施扒竊行為還是扒竊。在量刑方面,還需要綜合考慮行為人的主觀惡性、案件事實(shí)、數(shù)額及其他情節(jié),同時(shí)考慮到適用刑罰帶來(lái)的法律效果和社會(huì)效果,正確地定罪量刑。對(duì)扒竊犯罪量刑應(yīng)在量刑原則的指導(dǎo)下綜合考慮各方面情節(jié),除犯罪數(shù)額等法定量刑情節(jié),還要考慮行為人的扒竊動(dòng)機(jī)、扒竊手段、扒竊的時(shí)間、地點(diǎn)等當(dāng)時(shí)的環(huán)境和條件、扒竊侵害的對(duì)象、所造成的損害結(jié)果、行為人的個(gè)人情況和一貫表現(xiàn)、行為人犯罪后的態(tài)度等因素,在全面考慮各方面因素后,綜合量刑裁判,最終實(shí)現(xiàn)法律效果與社會(huì)效果有機(jī)統(tǒng)一。
[Abstract]:Pickpocketing brings a lot of controversy and confusion to judicial practice. In order to solve the problem of conviction for pickpocketing in judicial practice, it is necessary to define the concept and characteristics of pickpocketing. The crime of pickpocketing is an act of stealing property by peaceful means in public places for the purpose of illegally possessing the property carried by others. It can be seen that pickpocketing crime has the characteristics of location, object and behavior. Secondly, it is necessary to establish the unity of pickpocketing as a crime of larceny, strictly judge the standard and avoid the crime of arbitrary entry and exit. The so-called pickpocketing crime is a kind of special behavior mode of the theft crime, which has both the common characteristics of the theft crime and its own individual characteristics. To correctly identify the crime of pickpocketing, we should analyze and study it from four aspects: objective, subjective, object and subject of crime. Furthermore, it is necessary to correctly understand the attempted form of the crime of pickpocketing, and the scientific standard of determining the accomplished and attempted crime of pickpocketing should be to see whether the constitutive elements of the crime of pickpocketing are complete or not, and that the act of pickpocketing is declared complete as long as the perpetrator has the property. To the crime of pickpocketing, the value of stolen property is not the objective element of the crime. Finally, it is necessary to coordinate the difference between the standards of internal incrimination of theft and avoid confusion with other related criminal acts. The boundary between the crime of pickpocketing and the crime of pickpocketing. The difference between the crime of pickpocketing and the crime of robbery is mainly to see whether the perpetrator carries out forcible seizure of the victim in order to achieve the purpose of infringing property; pickpocketing is similar to the crime of robbery, both of which have the open characteristics and are easily confused in practice. How to distinguish between the two, we can make a distinction from the possibility of forcible seizure of property and the possibility of causing personal injury to the victim, and the crime of pickpocketing and embezzlement is different from the crime of embezzlement in terms of behavior mode and object of infringement. The former behavior is to steal, through certain means to change the property of others into their own possession, the latter is the illegal transfer of their own legally held property into their own possession: multiple theft and pickpocketing are contained and included relationship. That is, multiple theft includes pickpocketing, multiple acts of pickpocketing or pickpocketing. In the aspect of sentencing, it is also necessary to consider the subjective malignancy, the facts of the case, the amount and other circumstances, and at the same time, consider the legal and social effects of the applicable penalty, and correctly convict and sentence the penalty. Under the guidance of sentencing principles, the sentencing of pickpocketing crime should consider all aspects of circumstances, in addition to the statutory circumstances, such as the amount of the crime, but also the circumstances and conditions of the perpetrator's pickpocket motive, means of pickpocketing, time and place of pickpocketing, etc. The object, the result of the damage caused by pickpocketing, the individual situation and consistent performance of the perpetrator, the attitude of the perpetrator after the crime, and so on, after considering all factors in an all-round way, comprehensive sentencing judgment, Finally, realize the organic unification of legal effect and social effect.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國(guó)海洋大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D924.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 仝其憲;李智利;;關(guān)于《刑法修正案(八)》盜竊罪的幾個(gè)問(wèn)題[J];唐山師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年06期

2 王強(qiáng)軍;李莉;;新型盜竊行為研究[J];河南省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年Z1期

3 于阜民,夏弋舒;犯罪既遂概念:困惑與重構(gòu)[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);2005年02期

，

本文編號(hào)：1980283