本文選題：空白罪狀 + 補充規(guī)范　； 參考：《西南政法大學》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：空白罪狀是刑法分則條文規(guī)定的犯罪須參照相關規(guī)范確定其具體行為要件的犯罪模型。空白罪狀的焦點是清晰補充性規(guī)范的內(nèi)容或具體探問其到位的情況。為此，本文探究空白罪狀的思想基礎和理性根據(jù)，在梳理刑法條文的基礎上和對空白罪狀類型化歸納的基礎上，對空白罪狀結構進行系統(tǒng)的整理和分析。 文章分四部分，共三萬字。 第一部分，概述空白罪狀概念與特征。首先，界定空白罪狀的概念，分析其與構成要件的關系；其次，將空白罪狀與參見罪狀進行比較，分析它們的異同，清晰其特征；再次，探討空白罪狀在整個罪狀體系中的地位。 第二部分，闡釋空白罪狀的理論基礎與設立根據(jù)。首先，從罪刑法定的實質要求分析設置和解讀空白罪狀的理論基礎，由此從罪刑法定的形式側面討論空白罪狀的規(guī)范性、從罪刑法定的實質側面闡明空白罪狀不等于空缺構成要件的實質；其次，以刑法謙抑性原則為根基性要求，展開找法源的論證過程，確保犯罪標準的合理把握；最后，表明空白罪狀的存在不僅是體系性架構法律的客觀需要也是法定犯內(nèi)在規(guī)律的要求。 第三部分，對空白罪狀進行類型化分析。首先，，將空白罪狀分為典型的空白罪狀、非典型的空白罪狀類型，同時清晰應當排除的情形，為討論便利，用表格形式展示這些類型的分布概況；其次，為分析非典型空白罪狀的特點，擇取瀆職罪中相關條文為切入點；再次，分析歸納應當排除的情形；最后，總結空白罪狀的分布規(guī)律。 第四部分，對空白罪狀結構要素的分析。被援引的規(guī)范性文件被稱為空白罪狀的補充規(guī)范，對空白罪狀結構性要素的分析實則就是對補充規(guī)范的分析。首先，討論補充規(guī)范的表述形式、位階、范圍和內(nèi)容；其次，找法源的過程引出對司法解釋作用與風險的分析，一方面，揭示它在空白罪狀所屬條文與補充規(guī)范之間所起的溝通、聯(lián)系作用即紐帶和媒介的作用，另一方面，以非法經(jīng)營罪為例，分析與空白罪狀相關的司法解釋呈現(xiàn)逾越補充規(guī)范范圍的現(xiàn)象，進而指出造法的風險所在；最后，進一步清晰補充規(guī)范和刑法條文的密切關聯(lián)，補充規(guī)范的作用是填補空白罪狀所在刑法條文缺失的行為要件的具體內(nèi)容，起著封閉和充實犯罪構成要件的作用，這本身對我國行政立法能力和水平提出了更高的要求，同時，本文就如何實現(xiàn)補充規(guī)范和刑法條文的良性對接，提出了解決的路徑。
[Abstract]:Blank crime is a criminal model in which the criminal law stipulates that the crime must be determined according to the relevant norms. The focus of blank crime is to clarify the content of the supplementary specification or to inquire into the situation in place. Therefore, this paper explores the ideological basis and rational basis of blank crime, on the basis of combing the articles of criminal law and on the basis of the classification and induction of blank crime, the structure of blank crime is systematically arranged and analyzed. The article is divided into four parts, a total of 30,000 words. The first part summarizes the concept and characteristics of blank crime. First of all, define the concept of blank crime, analyze the relationship between blank crime and constitutive elements; secondly, compare blank crime with synonyms, analyze their similarities and differences, clarify their characteristics; third, To discuss the position of blank crime in the whole crime system. The second part explains the theoretical basis and establishment basis of blank crime. First of all, the theoretical basis of setting up and interpreting blank crime is analyzed and interpreted from the essence of legally prescribed crime, and the normative of blank crime is discussed from the aspect of the form of crime criminal law. From the essence side of the crime criminal law to clarify that blank crime does not equal to the essence of the vacant elements; secondly, to base on the principle of modesty of criminal law, to start the process of seeking legal source of argument to ensure the reasonable assurance of the crime standard; finally, It shows that the existence of blank crime is not only the objective need of systematic structure law, but also the requirement of the inherent law of legal offense. The third part analyzes the types of blank crimes. First, categorize blank counts into typical blank counts, atypical blank crime types, and make clear the situations that should be excluded so as to facilitate the discussion by presenting the distribution of these types in tabular form; second, In order to analyze the characteristics of atypical blank crime, select the relevant articles in the crime of dereliction of duty as the starting point; thirdly, analyze the circumstances that should be excluded; finally, summarize the distribution of blank crime. The fourth part analyzes the structural elements of blank crime. The cited normative documents are referred to as the supplementary norms of blank crimes, and the analysis of structural elements of blank crimes is the analysis of supplementary norms. First, it discusses the form, rank, scope and content of the supplementary norms. Secondly, the process of finding the source of law leads to the analysis of the function and risk of judicial interpretation. On the one hand, It reveals the communication between the article of blank crime and the supplementary norm, the link function that is the link and the function of the media. On the other hand, taking the crime of illegal business as an example, This paper analyzes the phenomenon that the judicial interpretation related to blank crime is beyond the scope of supplementary norms, and then points out the risk of making the law. Finally, it further clarifies the close relationship between the supplementary norms and the articles of criminal law. The role of supplementary norms is to fill in the specific contents of the behavior elements that are missing in the articles of criminal law, and play the role of closing and enriching the constitutive elements of crimes, which in itself puts forward higher requirements for the ability and level of administrative legislation in our country, at the same time, This article puts forward the way to solve how to realize the benign docking between the supplementary norms and the articles of criminal law.
【學位授予單位】：西南政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924.3

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 孫海龍;;論空白罪狀在中國刑法中的命運——從刑法機能二重性看空白罪狀和罪刑法定原則的沖突[J];福建法學;2002年01期

2 張明楷;論刑法的謙抑性[J];法商研究(中南政法學院學報);1995年04期

3 肖中華;王海橋;;空白刑法的規(guī)范詮釋:在規(guī)范彈性與構成要件明確性之間[J];法學雜志;2009年08期

4 劉德法;尤國富;;論空白罪狀中的“違反國家規(guī)定”[J];法學雜志;2011年01期

5 王玉玨;曲玉梁;;論刑法修正案對法定犯之修訂[J];法學;2011年04期

6 歐陽本祺;;對非法經(jīng)營罪兜底性規(guī)定的實證分析[J];法學;2012年07期

7 胡敏,曹堅;論非法經(jīng)營罪堵漏條款的合理認定[J];華東政法學院學報;2003年05期

8 劉樹德;罪刑法定原則中空白罪狀的追問[J];法學研究;2001年02期

9 唐稷堯;;論我國經(jīng)濟犯罪的立法模式選擇——兼談空白罪狀內(nèi)涵的解釋與補充[J];四川師范大學學報(社會科學版);2006年06期

10 王瑞君;;空白罪狀研究——以司法分析為視角[J];法學論壇;2008年04期

本文編號：1981202