本文選題：聚眾斗毆罪 + 聚眾犯罪�。� 參考：《蘇州大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：本文在理解聚眾斗毆罪“聚眾”行為與“斗毆”行為之關(guān)系以及處罰對(duì)象的基礎(chǔ)上，分別對(duì)“聚眾”行為與“斗毆”行為的認(rèn)定要點(diǎn)進(jìn)行了分析。 在分析認(rèn)定“聚眾”行為的部分，本文通過(guò)對(duì)聚眾斗毆罪與其他聚眾犯罪的共性、特殊性進(jìn)行比較，從而引出聚眾斗毆罪之“聚眾”情節(jié)在實(shí)務(wù)審判中的認(rèn)定難點(diǎn)——如何區(qū)別于一般民事糾紛中的“聚集”行為，并結(jié)合對(duì)案例的分析，，總結(jié)聚眾斗毆罪的“聚眾”情節(jié)與一般民事糾紛的“聚集”之認(rèn)定異同。 在分析對(duì)聚眾斗毆罪“斗毆”行為之認(rèn)定的部分，本文從（聚眾）斗毆行為主觀與客觀統(tǒng)一性的角度分析該如何認(rèn)定行為人的行為是否屬于聚眾斗毆罪的“斗毆”情節(jié)，并通過(guò)比較毆打行為構(gòu)成的其他罪行（以故意傷害罪為例），對(duì)其中的“開(kāi)始沒(méi)有斗毆故意，在情節(jié)發(fā)展中具有斗毆故意”之情形進(jìn)行簡(jiǎn)要分析。 最后，本文還對(duì)聚眾斗毆罪的加重情節(jié)之“持械”，列舉了典型案例，重點(diǎn)就“械”的界定，以及對(duì)未持械者責(zé)任認(rèn)定闡述了作者自身的觀點(diǎn)。
[Abstract]:Based on the understanding of the relationship between the behavior of "gathering the crowd" and the behavior of "affray" and the object of punishment, this paper analyzes the main points of the identification of the behavior of "gathering the crowd" and the behavior of "affray" respectively. In the part of analyzing the behavior of "gathering together", this article compares the common character and particularity of the crime of affray and other crime of gathering together. Thus, it leads to the difficulty of determining the plot of "gathering the crowd" in the practical trial-how to distinguish it from the behavior of "gathering" in general civil disputes, and combining with the analysis of the case, This paper summarizes the similarities and differences between the plot of gathering the masses and the common civil disputes. In the part of analyzing the identification of "affray" behavior of the crime of affray, this paper analyzes how to determine whether the behavior of the perpetrator belongs to the "affray" plot of the crime of affray from the angle of subjective and objective unity of the act of affray. By comparing other crimes constituted by beating (taking the crime of intentional injury as an example), this paper briefly analyzes the situation that "there is no brawl intention at the beginning and there is brawl intention in the development of the plot". At last, this paper enumerates the typical cases of the aggravated circumstances of the crime of affray, focuses on the definition of "armed", and expounds the author's own views on the responsibility of the unarmed.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘇州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D924.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 蘇雄華;;斗毆行為及其特征[J];重慶社會(huì)科學(xué);2009年10期

2 錢(qián)濤;;單方具有聚眾斗毆故意的行為應(yīng)如何認(rèn)定[J];法制與社會(huì);2010年01期

3 張啟環(huán);;聚眾斗毆罪的實(shí)務(wù)問(wèn)題研究[J];公安研究;2013年02期

4 王其星;;正當(dāng)防衛(wèi)與相互斗毆的界限[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2014年05期

5 張閃閃;;聚眾斗毆罪量刑情節(jié)之考量——以杭州某院近四年案例的調(diào)查分析為基礎(chǔ)[J];法制與社會(huì);2014年16期

6 樊華中;;非典型性聚眾斗毆犯罪的法律適用分析[J];中國(guó)檢察官;2013年10期

本文編號(hào)：1979535