本文選題：刑法306條　切入點(diǎn)：典型案例　出處：《哈爾濱商業(yè)大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：在我國(guó)刑事法律規(guī)范體系日益完備的大趨勢(shì)下,仍有部分法條在法律適用方面存在很大問題,由此而引發(fā)各界爭(zhēng)議也從未停止。我國(guó)刑法第306條是1997年刑法典中新增的內(nèi)容之一,自其出臺(tái)以來,就因?yàn)槠浞l適用內(nèi)容的不明確以及法條適用理念問題引發(fā)諸多爭(zhēng)議,尤其在"北海律師案"和"李莊案"發(fā)生后,對(duì)于該法條的存廢之爭(zhēng)達(dá)到頂峰。然而僅停留在"存廢之爭(zhēng)"的認(rèn)識(shí)層面并不能實(shí)際解決刑法第306條適用難題,關(guān)鍵是要從立法者本意來審視,結(jié)合我國(guó)的司法實(shí)際來分析本罪適用中所暴露的問題和缺陷,通過對(duì)本罪適用問題的原因剖析來提出完善適用建議,以便達(dá)到刑法條文適用的公正和控辯雙方地位的平衡發(fā)展。所以全盤否定本罪規(guī)定內(nèi)容亦或是完全回避本罪缺陷的做法都不妥。對(duì)本罪正確的看法應(yīng)該是立足本罪的規(guī)范基礎(chǔ),修正完善本罪適用條件和內(nèi)容,以便更好解決本罪適用中問題。本文以實(shí)證研究為主,將正文分為三部分。第一部分,從"刑法第306條"基本內(nèi)容入手,先介紹本罪的立法目的,設(shè)立的法理基礎(chǔ),同時(shí)概述分析本罪犯罪構(gòu)成,然后介紹各派對(duì)本罪的態(tài)度和看法;第二部分,首先對(duì)系列典型案例簡(jiǎn)要介紹和分析,然后再總結(jié)出本罪適用中暴露的共性問題,并對(duì)此做出分析;第三部分,主要是從法治理念、實(shí)體法內(nèi)容明確以及追訴程序完善方面給出刑法第306條正確適用之建議。
[Abstract]:In the general trend of our country's criminal law normative system being increasingly complete, there are still some legal provisions in the application of the law has a lot of problems, Article 306 of our Criminal Law is one of the new contents in the Criminal Code of 1997. Since its introduction, it has caused many disputes because of the unclear content of its applicable articles and the concept of its application. Especially after "Beihai lawyer case" and "Li Zhuang case" occurred, the debate on the retention and abolition of this article reached its peak. However, only staying at the level of understanding of "dispute between retention and abolition" could not actually solve the difficult problem of applying Article 306 of the Criminal Law. The key is to analyze the problems and defects in the application of this crime from the point of view of the intention of the legislator and the judicial reality of our country, and put forward some suggestions to perfect the application of the crime through the analysis of the reasons for the application of the crime. In order to achieve the fair application of the articles of the Criminal Law and the balanced development of the status of both the prosecution and the defence. Therefore, it is inappropriate to completely deny the contents of the provisions of this crime or completely avoid the defects of the crime. The correct view of this crime should be the normative basis based on this crime. Revise and improve the applicable conditions and contents of this crime in order to better solve the problems in the application of this crime. This paper mainly focuses on empirical research, and divides the text into three parts. The first part begins with the basic content of Article 306 of Criminal Law. First introduce the legislative purpose of the crime, the legal basis of the establishment, at the same time outline and analyze the composition of the crime, and then introduce the attitude and views of the various parties on this crime; the second part, first, a series of typical cases are briefly introduced and analyzed. Then summarizes the common problems exposed in the application of this crime, and makes an analysis of this; the third part, mainly from the concept of the rule of law, substantive law content clear and prosecution procedures to improve the correct application of the proposed 306 criminal law.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：哈爾濱商業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D924.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 蔣鈴;;我國(guó)《刑法》第306條的批判及其救濟(jì)路徑[J];法律適用;2013年06期

2 孫萬懷;;從李莊案看辯護(hù)人偽造證據(jù)、妨害作證罪的認(rèn)定[J];法學(xué);2010年04期

3 陳澤憲;;罪刑法定與擴(kuò)大解釋[J];人民檢察;2007年19期

，

本文編號(hào)：1690226