本文選題：網(wǎng)絡(luò)表達(dá)自由　切入點(diǎn)：法律保護(hù)　出處：《華東政法大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：表達(dá)自由是一系列相關(guān)權(quán)利和自由的一種總稱(chēng),它是一種法律權(quán)利和一項(xiàng)基本人權(quán),在受到憲法和法律保護(hù)的同時(shí),應(yīng)當(dāng)受到規(guī)制。 進(jìn)入網(wǎng)絡(luò)時(shí)代后,互聯(lián)網(wǎng)開(kāi)放、即時(shí)、互動(dòng)、無(wú)障礙的特性,極大豐富了表達(dá)自由的內(nèi)容和形式,也使網(wǎng)絡(luò)表達(dá)自由具有了匿名性、弱責(zé)任性等特點(diǎn)�；ヂ�(lián)網(wǎng)在拓展人們實(shí)現(xiàn)表達(dá)自由能力的同時(shí),令表達(dá)自由的法律保障和規(guī)制面臨著全新的局面。 本文從表達(dá)自由的內(nèi)涵入手展開(kāi)研究,分五章闡述了網(wǎng)絡(luò)表達(dá)自由的法律保護(hù)和規(guī)制。 第一章,表達(dá)自由概述。表達(dá)自由是一個(gè)具有多層次含義的復(fù)雜概念。盡管學(xué)者們對(duì)其稱(chēng)謂、內(nèi)涵的理解不同,但都認(rèn)同表達(dá)自由是公民的基本權(quán)利。本部分首先在比較各種觀點(diǎn)的基礎(chǔ)上歸納出表達(dá)自由的三層內(nèi)涵,然后對(duì)表達(dá)自由的憲法屬性和憲政價(jià)值作了概括,提出表達(dá)自由在受到憲法和法律保護(hù)的同時(shí),應(yīng)當(dāng)受到規(guī)制。 第二章,網(wǎng)絡(luò)世界的表達(dá)自由。隨著互聯(lián)網(wǎng)的發(fā)展,表達(dá)自由得以在更寬廣的領(lǐng)域?qū)崿F(xiàn)。本部分在分析互聯(lián)網(wǎng)對(duì)表達(dá)自由范疇的延展的基礎(chǔ)上,總結(jié)出網(wǎng)絡(luò)表達(dá)自由獨(dú)有的特點(diǎn),即開(kāi)放性和即時(shí)性、平等性和廣泛性、匿名性和弱責(zé)任性、不易預(yù)測(cè)性和難控性,從而考察這種變化是否會(huì)造成表達(dá)自由保護(hù)和規(guī)制的變化。 第三章,網(wǎng)絡(luò)表達(dá)自由面臨的現(xiàn)實(shí)沖突。本部分是對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)表達(dá)自由現(xiàn)狀的考察。網(wǎng)絡(luò)表達(dá)不可避免地與現(xiàn)實(shí)社會(huì)中的明規(guī)則、潛規(guī)則、意識(shí)形態(tài)等發(fā)生了沖突。一方面,網(wǎng)絡(luò)表達(dá)自由與其他公民權(quán)利之間需要尋求平衡點(diǎn);一方面,網(wǎng)絡(luò)表達(dá)自由的監(jiān)督功能刺痛著公權(quán)力的神經(jīng);而網(wǎng)絡(luò)表達(dá)自由本身的匿名性、弱責(zé)任性等特點(diǎn),又使網(wǎng)絡(luò)信息龍蛇混雜,甚至沖破社會(huì)底線。 第四章,網(wǎng)絡(luò)表達(dá)自由的法律保護(hù)。面臨諸多現(xiàn)實(shí)沖突的網(wǎng)絡(luò)表達(dá)自由,既應(yīng)當(dāng)受憲法和法律保護(hù),也應(yīng)當(dāng)有所規(guī)制,而且,這種規(guī)制的出發(fā)點(diǎn)也是為了更好地保護(hù)。本部分從國(guó)外已有的保護(hù)和規(guī)制網(wǎng)絡(luò)表達(dá)自由的范例入手,梳理了我國(guó)現(xiàn)有的相關(guān)法律法規(guī),剖析了現(xiàn)有機(jī)制存在的一些問(wèn)題。 第五章,規(guī)范網(wǎng)絡(luò)表達(dá)自由的思考——網(wǎng)絡(luò)實(shí)名制。本部分是筆者對(duì)保護(hù)和規(guī)制網(wǎng)絡(luò)表達(dá)自由的探索性思考。從圍繞網(wǎng)絡(luò)實(shí)名制展開(kāi)的諸多爭(zhēng)議入手,結(jié)合我國(guó)實(shí)際情況,分析我國(guó)實(shí)行網(wǎng)絡(luò)實(shí)名制的可行性以及做法。 總之,表達(dá)自由的內(nèi)涵不僅在于表達(dá)和不表達(dá)的自由,更在于公民有對(duì)表達(dá)行為和內(nèi)容承擔(dān)責(zé)任的能力和義務(wù)。在網(wǎng)絡(luò)這個(gè)具有虛擬性、匿名性的表達(dá)平臺(tái)上,實(shí)名制有利于保護(hù)和規(guī)制表達(dá)自由。
[Abstract]:Freedom of expression is a general term of a series of related rights and freedoms , which is a legal right and a fundamental human right , and should be regulated while protected by the Constitution and the law .

After entering the network era , the Internet is open , instant , interactive and barrier - free . The content and form of freedom of expression are greatly enriched , and the freedom of expression of the network has the characteristics of anonymity and weak responsibility .

This paper starts with the connotation of freedom of expression , and points out the legal protection and regulation of freedom of expression of the network .

In the first chapter , the expression of freedom is a complex concept with multi - level meaning . Although scholars have different understanding of their terms and meaning , it is recognized that freedom of expression is the basic right of citizens . This part firstly sums up the three - layer connotation of freedom of expression on the basis of comparing various perspectives , then summarizes the constitutional and constitutional values of freedom of expression , and puts forward that the freedom of expression should be regulated at the same time under the protection of the Constitution and the law .

In chapter 2 , the freedom of expression of the Internet is freedom . With the development of Internet , the freedom of expression can be realized in a wider field . This part summarizes the unique characteristics of freedom of expression of the network , namely openness and temporality , equality and universality , anonymity and weak responsibility , and is difficult to predict and difficult to control , so as to examine whether such changes can cause the change of freedom of expression and regulation .

In chapter 3 , the network expression freedom is confronted with the real conflicts . This part is the investigation of the current situation of the freedom of expression of the network . The network expression inevitably conflicts with the Ming rule , the latent rule , the ideology and so on in the real society . On the one hand , the network expression freedom and the other civil rights need to seek the balance point ; on the one hand , the network expresses the freedom of the supervision function to pierce the nerve of the public power ;

Chapter four , the legal protection of the freedom of expression of the network , should be protected by the constitution and law , should be regulated , and the starting point of this regulation is to protect it better . This part starts with the example of protecting and regulating the freedom of expression of the network in foreign countries . This part analyzes the existing relevant laws and regulations , and analyses some problems existing in the existing mechanism .

The fifth chapter is to regulate the freedom of network expression _ network real name system . This part is the author ' s exploration of protecting and regulating the freedom of network expression . This part starts with many disputes about network real name system and analyzes the feasibility and practice of implementing network real name system in our country .

In short , the connotation of freedom of expression is not only the freedom of expression and expression , but also the ability and obligation of citizens to assume responsibility for the expression behavior and content .

【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D921

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 燕道成;蔡騏;;國(guó)外網(wǎng)絡(luò)輿論管理及啟示[J];當(dāng)代傳播;2007年02期

2 張西明;從Non-regulation走向Regulation──網(wǎng)絡(luò)時(shí)代如何保障言論自由[J];法學(xué);2001年07期

3 田佑中;失范:因特網(wǎng)時(shí)代傳統(tǒng)的社會(huì)控制面臨的挑戰(zhàn)——一種社會(huì)哲學(xué)的探討[J];國(guó)際論壇;2001年04期

4 邵培仁,李雯;隱性障礙:通往表達(dá)自由之路上的伏擊[J];杭州師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2003年05期

5 蔣云蔚;網(wǎng)絡(luò)言論自由的私法限制[J];黑龍江省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年05期

6 楊久華;;試論我國(guó)網(wǎng)絡(luò)表達(dá)自由發(fā)展的障礙因素及其對(duì)策[J];蘭州學(xué)刊;2008年05期

7 韓大元;因特網(wǎng)時(shí)代的憲法學(xué)研究新課題[J];環(huán)球法律評(píng)論;2001年01期

8 吉玉泉;憲政視野里的第四種權(quán)力——言論自由權(quán)在法權(quán)體系中的定位及其憲政考察[J];新聞知識(shí);2005年02期

9 朱兵;英國(guó)傳媒業(yè)中介管理機(jī)構(gòu)的影響和作用[J];新聞戰(zhàn)線;2001年02期

10 杜承銘;論表達(dá)自由[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);2001年03期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 殷嘯虎;[N];解放日?qǐng)?bào);2006年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 黃惟勤;論網(wǎng)絡(luò)表達(dá)自由[D];中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院研究生院;2010年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 趙天富;互聯(lián)網(wǎng)表達(dá)自由的保障與限制[D];西北民族大學(xué);2010年

2 李巖;網(wǎng)絡(luò)表達(dá)自由的保障與限制[D];北方工業(yè)大學(xué);2011年

3 王弋;網(wǎng)絡(luò)實(shí)名制涉及的主要法律問(wèn)題研究[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號(hào)：1686906