本文選題：履行輔助人 + 違約責(zé)任�。� 參考：《南昌大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：旅游履行輔助人指的是與旅行社存在合同關(guān)系,協(xié)助旅行社履行包價(jià)旅游合同的部分旅游服務(wù)義務(wù),而實(shí)際上提供相關(guān)旅游服務(wù)的自然人或法人。目前,對(duì)包價(jià)旅游合同履行輔助人的法律地位和法律概念的研究往往受到傳統(tǒng)民法學(xué)中債務(wù)人之履行輔助人制度影響,所以其一直未形成統(tǒng)一而堅(jiān)實(shí)的理論基礎(chǔ);此外,旅游履行輔助人的主體劃分也不合理,對(duì)于公共交通運(yùn)營(yíng)者是否作為旅游履行輔助人的問(wèn)題也沒(méi)有統(tǒng)一的意見(jiàn)。這些問(wèn)題都會(huì)導(dǎo)致履行輔助人與旅行社、游客之間的權(quán)利義務(wù)不夠明確。實(shí)踐中由于包價(jià)旅游合同的旅游履行輔助人不履行相關(guān)義務(wù)導(dǎo)致的旅游糾紛經(jīng)常發(fā)生,所以為了合理地解決這些糾紛問(wèn)題,對(duì)其概念的合理界定、明確其法律地位、規(guī)范其應(yīng)有的民事責(zé)任就顯得尤為重要。本文探討了我國(guó)旅游履行輔助人在包價(jià)旅游活動(dòng)中的概念、地位、類型以及應(yīng)當(dāng)承擔(dān)的民事責(zé)任,以期為完善我國(guó)旅游履行輔助人民事責(zé)任制度提供一些參考。本文以研究論文的形式,通過(guò)對(duì)包價(jià)旅游合同履行輔助人的分析研究,旨在明確其法律概念和地位并理清其民事法律責(zé)任。本文共分為五大部分。第一部分是引言,簡(jiǎn)要分析了我國(guó)旅游履行輔助人的現(xiàn)狀、相關(guān)的案例分析、我國(guó)旅游履行輔助人民事責(zé)任制度存在的問(wèn)題。第二部分介紹了旅游輔助服務(wù)人的概述,包括了包價(jià)旅游的概念、特征和包價(jià)旅游合同的概念和特征;旅游輔助服務(wù)人概念、地位和具體類型和承擔(dān)責(zé)任的具體案例分析進(jìn)行了簡(jiǎn)單的闡述。第三部分是對(duì)包價(jià)旅游合同的履行輔助人所承擔(dān)的違約責(zé)任研究,分析哪種情形下旅游履行輔助人才承擔(dān)違約責(zé)任及違約責(zé)任的形態(tài);指出其不承擔(dān)包價(jià)旅游合同責(zé)任的基礎(chǔ)理論是合同相對(duì)性原理,并結(jié)合境內(nèi)外法律規(guī)定對(duì)其進(jìn)行分析。第四部分是對(duì)包價(jià)旅游合同的履行輔助人所承擔(dān)的侵權(quán)責(zé)任研究,首先分析其承擔(dān)侵權(quán)責(zé)任的基礎(chǔ)是安全保障義務(wù),進(jìn)而分析了其安全保障義務(wù)的概念,來(lái)源和具體內(nèi)容;其次分析了承擔(dān)侵權(quán)責(zé)任的歸責(zé)原則和判斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn),最后把其承擔(dān)侵權(quán)責(zé)任的情形分成2種類型,即因自身原因擔(dān)侵權(quán)責(zé)任和因第三人原因擔(dān)侵權(quán)責(zé)任。第五部分介紹了對(duì)旅游輔助服務(wù)人責(zé)任制度的完善的幾點(diǎn)建議:首先我國(guó)對(duì)旅游履行輔助人定位不夠明確,所以要明確其概念和在旅游活動(dòng)中的地位;其次要明確其承擔(dān)民事責(zé)任的不同請(qǐng)求權(quán)基礎(chǔ);再次明確第三人侵權(quán)時(shí)第三人與旅游履行輔助人的的責(zé)任分配;最后明確旅游履行輔助人的民事責(zé)任減免制度。
[Abstract]:Tourism performance Auxiliary refers to the existence of a contractual relationship with the travel agency to assist the travel agency in fulfilling some of the tour service obligations of the package tourism contract, but in fact the natural person or legal person who provides the related tourism services. At present, the research on the legal status and legal concept of the assistive party to fulfill the contract of package tourism is often influenced by the system of the debtor in the traditional civil law, so it has not formed a unified and solid theoretical foundation. It is also unreasonable to divide the main body of tourist performance auxiliaries, and there is no unified opinion on whether the public transport operators are the auxiliary persons of tourism performance. These problems will lead to the fulfilment of assistive and travel agencies, tourists between the rights and obligations are not clear. In practice, the tourism disputes caused by the tour performance auxiliaries' failure to perform the related obligations often occur, so in order to solve these disputes reasonably, the concept is reasonably defined and its legal status is clearly defined. It is particularly important to standardize its due civil liability. This paper probes into the concept, status, type and civil liability of tourism performance auxiliaries in package tourism activities in China, in order to provide some references for perfecting the civil liability system of tourism performance auxiliaries in China. In the form of a research paper, this paper aims to clarify its legal concept and status and clarify its civil legal liability through the analysis and study of the assistant party to fulfill the package tour contract. This paper is divided into five parts. The first part is the introduction, which briefly analyzes the present situation of tourism performance assistant in our country, the relevant case analysis, the problems existing in the civil liability system of tourism performance assistant in our country. The second part introduces the overview of tourism assistant service providers, including the concept of package tourism, characteristics and the concept and characteristics of package tourism contract, tourism assistant service person concept, The status and specific types of specific cases and the responsibility of the analysis of the simple elaboration. The third part is the research of the breach liability of the assistant party of the package price tourism contract, and analyzes the form of the default responsibility and the default liability of the tourism performing assistant talents under which circumstances; It is pointed out that the basic theory of its non-assumption of contract liability is the principle of relativity of contract, and it is analyzed in combination with the domestic and foreign laws and regulations. The fourth part is the research on the tort liability of the assistant party of the package price tourism contract. Firstly, it analyzes that the basis of the tort liability is the duty of safety and security, and then analyzes the concept, source and concrete content of the duty of safety and security. Secondly, it analyzes the liability principle and judgment standard of tort liability, and finally divides its liability into two types, that is, the tort liability for its own reasons and the tort liability for the third party. The fifth part introduces some suggestions on how to perfect the responsibility system of tourism assistant service: firstly, the orientation of tourism assistant is not clear enough, so we should define its concept and position in tourism activities; Secondly, it should make clear the different claim basis of its civil liability; clarify the distribution of liability between the third party and the tourist helper when the third party torts again; finally, clear the relief system of the civil liability of the tourism performance assistant.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南昌大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D922.294;D923.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 許政賢;;旅游契約履行輔助人之責(zé)任——以臺(tái)灣地區(qū)法院實(shí)務(wù)見(jiàn)解為中心[J];蘇州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(法學(xué)版);2017年01期

2 李珊;楊峰;;旅游糾紛中的連帶責(zé)任基礎(chǔ)分析——以特定身份關(guān)聯(lián)說(shuō)為視角[J];學(xué)術(shù)探索;2016年06期

3 韓長(zhǎng)印;;旅行社責(zé)任險(xiǎn)的責(zé)任范圍問(wèn)題[J];法學(xué)家;2016年01期

4 汪旭鵬;;《旅游法》履行輔助人制度評(píng)析[J];旅游學(xué)刊;2015年09期

5 謝登科;;論旅游合同糾紛中的精神損害賠償——基于實(shí)證主義的闡釋[J];旅游學(xué)刊;2015年07期

6 關(guān)長(zhǎng)宇;尚希文;;美國(guó)侵權(quán)法中連帶責(zé)任制度的改革方案及其啟示[J];江西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2015年02期

7 鄧蕊;;論旅游輔助服務(wù)者的法律責(zé)任[J];西華大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2015年02期

8 葉金強(qiáng);;旅游糾紛中的連帶責(zé)任——以“焦建軍與中山國(guó)旅等旅游侵權(quán)糾紛案”為參照[J];法學(xué);2015年02期

9 鄧勇;蔡睿;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者連帶責(zé)任的解釋論基礎(chǔ)——以“行為關(guān)聯(lián)”的共同侵權(quán)為視角[J];黨政干部學(xué)刊;2015年01期

10 李朝暉;;旅游交通事故若干問(wèn)題的思考——兼論《旅游法》第七十一條[J];法制與社會(huì);2014年20期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 蔣傲雨;我國(guó)旅游合同糾紛民事責(zé)任認(rèn)定與解決機(jī)制研究[D];中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院研究生院;2016年

2 施巧奇;包價(jià)旅游合同履行輔助人的法律地位及責(zé)任[D];大連海事大學(xué);2015年

3 周筱蘊(yùn);旅行社與履行輔助人的責(zé)任分配問(wèn)題研究[D];浙江大學(xué);2014年

4 王皎;焦某訴某國(guó)際旅行社侵權(quán)糾紛案評(píng)析[D];湖南大學(xué);2014年

，

本文編號(hào)：2096277