【摘要】：本文通過對中西方有關(guān)婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸的政治經(jīng)濟(jì)條件、文化背景、制度構(gòu)造等的歷史演變的比較，，對我國當(dāng)前是否適合將婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸犯罪化進(jìn)行了追問，并在此過程中證明了由于強(qiáng)大的傳統(tǒng)文化等因素的制約，婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸若貿(mào)然以強(qiáng)奸罪來處罰會(huì)造成刑法與社會(huì)大眾之間產(chǎn)生隔閡，產(chǎn)生異己狀態(tài)：同時(shí)也證明了當(dāng)我們面臨婦女個(gè)體自由和婚姻家庭關(guān)系穩(wěn)定這一兩難的選擇時(shí)，更應(yīng)當(dāng)優(yōu)先考慮社會(huì)秩序，而不是一個(gè)違法的行為應(yīng)該受到什么樣的懲罰。 本文亦以罪刑法定原則、刑法的謙抑性原則和犯罪構(gòu)成的要件等對婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸進(jìn)行了考查，結(jié)合對我國婚姻法有關(guān)規(guī)定和婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸的司法可行性等方面的分析，指出在目前情況下將婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸以強(qiáng)奸罪處，有違刑法的基本原則，并且會(huì)使刑法過度濫用。這不僅擴(kuò)大了其打擊面，而且刑法輕易介入其它法律可以很好解決的領(lǐng)域，不利于其它法律效用的應(yīng)有發(fā)揮。當(dāng)然，這些考查都是與政治經(jīng)濟(jì)等條件的中西方比較及形而上文化價(jià)值追問相勾連的。 本文第一章列舉了婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸現(xiàn)狀，并對其歷史進(jìn)行追溯。第二章清理了有關(guān)婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸的爭論。第五章指出了我國目前可以有效利用的解決婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸的辦法與途徑，強(qiáng)調(diào)道德規(guī)范、調(diào)解機(jī)制及《婚姻法》、《刑法》等的相關(guān)規(guī)定都可對婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸進(jìn)行處罰。為逐步跟上世界立法潮流，本文還提出了引入別居制度作為解決婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸問題的制度準(zhǔn)備。至于文化等方面的解決辦法，就在本文的討論范圍之外了。
[Abstract]:By comparing the political and economic conditions, cultural background and institutional structure of marital rape between China and the West, this paper asks whether it is appropriate to criminalize marital rape in China at present. In this process, it has been proved that, because of the strong traditional culture and other factors, marital rape if the crime of rape to punish will cause a gap between the criminal law and the general public. The emergence of dissent: it also proves that when faced with the dilemma of women's individual freedom and stable marriage and family relations, we should give priority to social order rather than punishment for an illegal act. This paper also examines marital rape with the principle of legality, the principle of modesty of criminal law and the elements of criminal constitution, and analyzes the relevant provisions of Marriage Law and the judicial feasibility of marital rape in China. It is pointed out that the crime of rape in marriage is contrary to the basic principles of criminal law and will cause excessive abuse of criminal law. This not only broadens its scope of attack, but also involves the criminal law easily in areas where other laws can be solved easily, which is not conducive to the proper exertion of other legal effects. Of course, these examinations are connected with the comparison of political and economic conditions between China and the West and metaphysical cultural values. The first chapter enumerates the present situation of marital rape and traces its history. Chapter two clears the debate about marital rape. The fifth chapter points out the methods and approaches to solve marital rape which can be effectively used in our country at present, and emphasizes that the relevant provisions of moral standard, mediation mechanism, marriage law and criminal law can punish marital rape. In order to keep up with the trend of legislation in the world, this paper also puts forward the introduction of alternative residence system as the system preparation to solve the problem of marital rape. As for cultural and other aspects of the solution, is beyond the scope of this discussion.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：四川大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2004
【分類號(hào)】：D924.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 沈亮;丈夫可以對妻子構(gòu)成強(qiáng)奸罪[J];法學(xué);2000年03期

2 周永坤;婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸罪的法理學(xué)分析[J];法學(xué);2000年10期

3 陳興良;罪刑法定的當(dāng)代命運(yùn)[J];法學(xué)研究;1996年02期

4 范忠信;中國傳統(tǒng)法律文化的哲學(xué)基礎(chǔ)[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);1999年02期

5 廖萬里,劉藝乒;論“婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸”犯罪化應(yīng)當(dāng)緩行[J];云南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(法學(xué)版);2002年01期

本文編號(hào)：2287854