本文選題：夫妻共同財產 + 個人財產��； 參考：《復旦大學》2008年碩士論文

【摘要】： 改革開放以來,隨著社會主義市場經濟的迅速發(fā)展,人們生活水平的不斷提高,夫妻財產的表現(xiàn)形式、財產構成、價值大小等方面,與傳統(tǒng)意義上的夫妻財產相比較,已經出現(xiàn)了明顯的變化。在現(xiàn)實生活中,夫妻財產呈現(xiàn)多元化趨勢已是普遍的現(xiàn)象。許多家庭不僅有了可觀的有形財產,還擁有了許多無形資產,如股權,著作權,專利以及一些預期的經濟利益。這些不斷出現(xiàn)的財產類型一方面豐富了我國夫妻財產的內容,但另一方面由于這些財產本身的復雜性與多樣性,使得在認定夫妻財產的性質上增加了一個“模糊區(qū)”,增加了在實體上認識這類財產性質的難度;同時,由于這類財產涉及到我國公司法、知識產權法等內容,分割這些財產時常常涉及到第三人的利益,常常引發(fā)部門法之間的沖突,從而增加了在適用各種法律上分割夫妻財產的難度。夫妻財產的復雜性所導致的對傳統(tǒng)夫妻財產分割理論的巨大沖擊,使得關于夫妻財產分割的法律法規(guī)不得不做出相應的調整和增補。雖然我國在2001年對1980年《婚姻法》進行了修正,并于同年12月出臺了最高人民法院《關于適用中華人民共和國婚姻法若干問題的解釋(一)》,但這些法律和司法解釋已明顯地不適應夫妻財產多元化和復雜化的現(xiàn)實,存在著極明顯的滯后。為此,我國在2004年4月1日又實行了最高人民法院《關于適用中華人民共和國婚姻法若干問題的解釋(二)》。2004年《司法解釋(二)》的施行,完善了夫妻財產分割方面的規(guī)定,它不僅對婚姻法中夫妻個人財產和共同財產的種類作了更為明確具體的規(guī)定,還對以往夫妻財產分割的疑難情形(如房屋、企業(yè)產權、養(yǎng)老金、知識產權收益等的分割)作了規(guī)定,對當前審判實踐有著巨大的指導作用,更具有可操作性。但是,法律作為社會生活的反映,它相對于社會生活中出現(xiàn)的紛繁復雜的情形,仍然會出現(xiàn)滯后或“真空地帶”。因此,本文擬研究離婚時夫妻財產分割的新問題,并重點探索知識產權收益的認定和分割,旨在拋磚引玉,以期法律的進一步完善。 本論文除引言,結語外,包括五個部分,共約四萬字。文章首先介紹了我國現(xiàn)行婚姻法及相關司法解釋的規(guī)定,與以往立法相比的進步性,然后評價大陸法系的俄羅斯、法國及英美法系的美國的相關立法概況,并在借鑒國外相關立法的基礎上,結合我國實際,提出完善我國夫妻財產分割的立法建議。 引言本部分主要介紹本文的寫作目的和寫作意義。當前夫妻財產糾紛層出不窮,面對新形勢下的夫妻財產糾紛,婚姻法和相關司法解釋出現(xiàn)了“盲點”,法院審理案件時出現(xiàn)了誤區(qū)。因此,本文就從分析現(xiàn)行規(guī)定入手,針對實踐中出現(xiàn)的新問題,探討夫妻財產分割立法的完善。 第一章評述現(xiàn)行《婚姻法》關于離婚時夫妻財產分割的立法規(guī)定,及其較之以往的進步性。結合相關司法解釋的實務性規(guī)定,指出夫妻共同財產的范圍、共同財產分割的原則及分割方法。 第二章國外部分國家關于離婚夫妻財產分割的立法。該部分從夫妻共同財產的范圍、財產分割的原則、財產分割的效力方面對大陸法系的俄羅斯、法國和英美法系的美國的夫妻財產分割立法作了簡要的介紹,并對他們的夫妻財產分割立法進行評價。 第三章夫妻財產分割的立法缺陷。通過對國外立法的比較研究,反思我國立法的缺陷,主要是夫妻共同財產范圍規(guī)定的缺陷、分割原則的缺陷和分割方法的不足,并且從案例入手指出現(xiàn)行立法針對知識產權收益的規(guī)定有失公允。 第四章完善我國夫妻財產分割立法的建議。首先闡述修改和完善我國夫妻財產分割立法的重要意義,然后針對我國實踐中的新情形,在借鑒國外立法經驗的基礎上,結合我國實際,提出完善我國夫妻財產分割立法的建議。最后,借鑒美國立法提出依成本—收益規(guī)則決定知識產權收益的歸屬,最后建議增設分割知識產權收益應參考的因素
[Abstract]:Since the reform and opening to the outside world, with the rapid development of the socialist market economy, the continuous improvement of people's living standards, the form of husband and wife property, the property structure, the value size and so on, compared with the traditional husband and wife property, there have been obvious changes. In real life, the diversified trend of husband and wife's property has been universal. Many families not only have considerable tangible property, but also have many intangible assets, such as equity, copyright, patent and some expected economic benefits. These types of property, on the one hand, enrich the content of the property of our husband and wife, on the other hand, because of the complexity and diversity of the property itself, In determining the nature of husband and wife's property, a "fuzzy zone" has been added to the difficulty of recognizing the nature of such property in the entity; at the same time, as the property involves the company law of our country, the intellectual property law and so on, the benefits of third people are often involved in the division of the property, which often leads to the conflict between department laws, thus increasing It is difficult to divide the husband and wife property in all kinds of law. The complexity of the husband and wife's property has caused a great impact on the theory of the traditional husband and wife property division, which makes the laws and regulations on the division of husband and wife property have to be adjusted and supplemented. Although China has amended the marriage law in 1980 in 2001, and in the same year 12 In this month, the Supreme People's court, "the interpretation of several questions on the application of the marriage law of the People's Republic of China (1),", but these legal and judicial interpretations have obviously not adapted to the reality of the multiplex and complexity of husband and wife's property, and there is a very obvious lag. In April 1, 2004, our country implemented the Supreme People's Court on the application of "the application of the Supreme People's court" in April 1, 2004. The interpretation of several problems in People's Republic of China's Marriage Law (two) the implementation of "judicial interpretation (two)" in >.2004 has perfected the provisions on the division of marital property. It not only made specific provisions on the types of marital property and common property in marriage law, but also the difficult situation of the division of property between husband and wife (such as houses and enterprises). The division of property rights, pension, intellectual property income, etc., has been prescribed, which has a great guiding role in the practice of the current trial and more operable. However, as a reflection of social life, the law still appears to be lagging behind or "vacuum zone" in relation to the complicated and complicated situation in social life. Therefore, this paper is to be studied. The new problem of marital property separation is discussed, and the identification and segmentation of intellectual property gains are mainly explored.
Besides the introduction and conclusion, this paper includes five parts, including about forty thousand words. The article first introduces the provisions of the current marriage law and the relevant judicial interpretations of our country, compared with the previous legislation, and then evaluates the relevant legislation in the United States of Russia, France and the Anglo American law system in the continental law system, and draws on the basis of the related legislation of foreign countries. On the basis of the reality of China, we put forward legislative proposals to improve the division of marital property in China.
The introduction of this part mainly introduces the purpose of writing and the meaning of writing. The current marital property disputes emerge in an endless stream. Facing the marital property disputes in the new situation, the marriage law and the relevant judicial interpretations appear "blind spot", the court has misunderstandings when the case is heard. Therefore, this article starts with the analysis of the current regulations and aims at the practice. The new problem is to discuss the perfection of the legislation for the division of husband and wife property.
The first chapter reviews the legislative provisions of the marriage law on the division of marital property at the time of divorce and its previous progressiveness, and points out the scope of the common property of the husband and wife, the principle of the division of common property and the method of segmentation in combination with the practical provisions of the relevant judicial interpretations.
The second chapter of the legislation on the division of divorced husband and wife property in some foreign countries. This part gives a brief introduction to the legislation of the division of husband and wife property in the Russian, French and Anglo American legal systems of the continental law system and the division of their husband and wife property from the scope of the conjugal property, the principle of property division and the effectiveness of the division of property. The method is evaluated.
The third chapter is the legislative defect of husband and wife property division. Through the comparative study of foreign legislation, the defects of the legislation in China are reflected, mainly the defects of the scope of the common property of husband and wife, the defects of the principle of division and the insufficiency of the method of segmentation, and the regulations on the income of intellectual property from the case to the finger are unfair.
The fourth chapter consummates the proposal of our country husband and wife property division legislation. First, it expounds the importance of modifying and perfecting the legislation of marital property division in our country. Then, in view of the new situation in our country, on the basis of drawing lessons from foreign legislative experience and combining our country's practice, this paper puts forward some suggestions to improve the legislation of the division of marital property in our country. Finally, draw on the United States The legislation proposes to determine the ownership of intellectual property gains based on the cost income rule, and finally suggests the factors that should be taken into account in the division of intellectual property benefits.
【學位授予單位】：復旦大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2008
【分類號】：D923.9

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 時權吉;;補辦結婚證后,夫妻共同財產從何時算起?[J];鄉(xiāng)村科技;2010年10期

2 辛祥;;婚前借錢買房,婚后共同還貸,房子是共同財產嗎?[J];鄉(xiāng)村科技;2010年02期

3 李欣;;因人身損害獲得的賠償是夫妻共同財產嗎[J];婚姻與家庭(性情讀本);2011年06期

4 任露萍;;論婚內夫妻個人財產的侵權損害賠償責任[J];東方企業(yè)文化;2011年14期

5 時權吉;;贈與的婚房如何分割?[J];鄉(xiāng)村科技;2010年06期

6 潘肖肖;;新形勢下夫妻共同財產的認定[J];遼寧行政學院學報;2011年08期

7 吳明;;有房結婚才是個大笑話[J];跨世紀(時文博覽);2011年06期

8 陳哆;;關于夫妻間違背忠實義務方個人財產賠付的問題思考[J];法制與社會;2011年19期

9 ;用一方公積金貸款買房算夫妻共同財產嗎?[J];家庭之友(愛侶);2011年06期

10 李剛;;論離婚時“婚前按揭房”的歸屬認定與分割[J];四川職業(yè)技術學院學報;2011年04期

相關會議論文 前10條

1 汪旭鵬;;現(xiàn)行夫妻財產制缺陷研究[A];第三屆貴州法學論壇文集[C];2001年

2 汪旭鵬;;現(xiàn)行夫妻財產制缺陷研究[A];貴州法學論壇第三屆文集[C];2001年

3 姜朋;;股權共有與公司人格獨立——當公司股東僅剩夫妻二人時[A];中國商法年刊第二卷（2002）[C];2002年

4 楊白;;離婚訴訟中婚前按揭房的分割處理分析[A];當代法學論壇（二○一○年第3輯）[C];2010年

5 William M.Ciesla;;支持世界范圍的野火管理[A];聯(lián)合國國際減輕自然災害十年論文精選本論文集[C];2004年

6 朱粵菊;;如何做好護理上的告知義務[A];全國門、急診護理學術交流暨專題講座會議論文匯編[C];2006年

7 方竹蘭;;論民主首先是一種產權[A];第五期中國現(xiàn)代化研究論壇論文集[C];2007年

8 錢智;;不動產善意取得與無權處分[A];中國民商法實務論壇論文集[C];2005年

9 李婷玉;;構建上海反腐倡廉長效機制的路徑分析——基于上海領導干部問卷調查的思考[A];2008年度上海市社會科學界第六屆學術年會文集（青年學者文集）[C];2008年

10 張新光;;新一輪農村改革的突破口仍是解決土地問題[A];首屆湖湘三農論壇論文集（中）[C];2008年

相關重要報紙文章 前10條

1 劉剛;是婚前個人財產還是夫妻共同財產[N];江蘇經濟報;2005年

2 北京市鑫諾律師事務所 李鵬濤;離婚時按揭房怎么分[N];中國婦女報;2010年

3 馬麗萍;復婚前個人財產 離婚后不可共有[N];法治快報;2007年

4 山東省德州市中級人民法院 鄭春筍　楊敏;生活補助費的財產性質[N];人民法院報;2009年

5 蔣先鋒;婚離了按揭房如何分割[N];江蘇經濟報;2008年

6 李峰;婚前按揭購房產權歸誰？[N];江蘇法制報;2010年

7 案例編寫人 上海市第二中級人民法院 岑華春　上海市普陀區(qū)人民法院 王飛;一方婚前貸款所購房屋可認定為個人財產[N];人民法院報;2010年

8 李連求;按揭房產,“我的”還是“我們的”？[N];江蘇法制報;2007年

9 潘強邋張周斌;共同還貸 增值部分共有[N];人民法院報;2008年

10 河南省新野縣人民法院 魏少永　吳瑞峰;離婚時房屋增值與按揭購房分割問題的處理[N];人民法院報;2008年

相關博士學位論文 前6條

1 裴樺;夫妻共同財產制研究[D];吉林大學;2008年

2 高永平;平安村的財產繼承[D];中國人民大學;2005年

3 惠建利;社會主義市場經濟條件下私有財產權保護問題研究[D];陜西師范大學;2010年

4 劉增;婚姻契約觀念的限度與嬗變[D];吉林大學;2012年

5 尹成波;從異子之科到禁止別籍異財[D];浙江大學;2009年

6 閆何清;財產、制度與人[D];中共中央黨校;2011年

相關碩士學位論文 前10條

1 賈肖虎;論離婚時婚前按揭房屋的歸屬與分割[D];華東政法大學;2011年

2 劉珊;論夫妻共同財產的若干法律問題[D];中國政法大學;2004年

3 邢文娟;淺析離婚財產分割法律制度[D];復旦大學;2008年

4 戴瑞亭;論離婚案件房產分割與女性權益保護[D];中國政法大學;2011年

5 蘇陶成;婚內侵權損害賠償問題研究[D];煙臺大學;2009年

6 曹大慶;夫妻共同財產分割若干問題研究[D];蘭州大學;2009年

7 楊帆;離婚糾紛中按揭房屋的歸屬與分割[D];華東政法大學;2011年

8 李穎;夫妻共同財產界定中的若干問題分析[D];復旦大學;2008年

9 程艷華;論我國夫妻共同財產分割立法的完善[D];廈門大學;2008年

10 張麗;我國夫妻共同財產范圍研究[D];大連海事大學;2009年

，

本文編號：1964130