繼承權放棄制度研究
發(fā)布時間:2018-06-02 19:29
本文選題:繼承權 + 繼承權放棄制度 ; 參考:《西南政法大學》2014年碩士論文
【摘要】:繼承權放棄制度是對遺產的順利移轉和繼承中相關利益主體權益的公平保護均具有重要意義的一項財產繼承制度。我國當前的繼承權放棄制度因受現(xiàn)行繼承法制定之初的社會經濟發(fā)展水平、時代背景及立法經驗和技術所限,其內容較為簡單和原則。面對二十多年后迅速發(fā)展的社會經濟、日益復雜的繼承法律關系及民眾繼承觀念已發(fā)生一定變化的客觀情況,該制度的不足日益凸顯,在立法制度安排和制度的具體內容上均有待進一步的明確或完善。 文章擬對繼承權放棄的有關理論問題進行探討,闡述其發(fā)展軌跡,揭示該制度的立法宗旨。對國外的相關立法進行考察和比較分析,總結出國外該制度相關立法的有益經驗,結合目前學者對繼承權放棄制度的理論研究,在考量我國民眾的繼承習慣和社情、國情的基礎上提出完善我國繼承權放棄制度的建議。 除引言和結語外,正文共分為四個部分: 第一部分為繼承權放棄制度的概述。首先對繼承權的含義及性質進行界定和分析,指明本文中所涉及的繼承權僅為狹義層面的繼承權,進而對繼承權放棄的含義進行介紹,通過與易混淆的遺產的放棄、繼承權的喪失兩個法律概念進行比較,分析其性質。最后對繼承權放棄制度的發(fā)展進行概述,從該制度的起源和發(fā)展歷程指出其立法宗旨是以繼承自愿、公平和誠實信用為基本理念,力求繼承中所涉各方利益主體的權益能夠得到衡平保護。 第二部分為國外繼承權放棄制度的立法介紹與評析。主要通過對德國、法國、日本和瑞士四個國家的相關立法進行考察,,在對各國繼承權放棄制度的立法制度安排和具體內容進行比較分析的基礎上,總結所考察各國相關立法注重尊重其本國民眾的繼承習慣與觀念,在制度設計上努力尋求繼承中各方主體利益衡平保護的有益經驗。 第三部分為我國繼承權放棄制度的現(xiàn)狀。首先介紹我國現(xiàn)行繼承權放棄制度的立法概況及基本內容,指出當前一些因繼承權放棄所引發(fā)糾紛的解決存有困惑,繼承相關主體權益的保護缺乏救濟的司法情況,指出我國現(xiàn)行繼承權放棄制度在期限、方式、限制及效力等方面存在的有待完善之處。 第四部分為我國繼承權放棄制度的完善。主要是結合我國民眾當前的繼承習慣和我國實際情況,對國內學者和司法實務工作者完善繼承權放棄制度的建議及觀點進行分析,并以國外的有益立法經驗作為借鑒,對我國繼承權放棄制度的制度安排及內容提出完善建議:一是在制度安排上,將該制度的內容放入繼承法的總則之中,體現(xiàn)其獨立性;二是在繼承權放棄制度的內容上須完善繼承權放棄的代理,明確繼承權放棄應在確定的時間內以書面形式作出,并不得附有保留條件和部分進行。明確繼承權放棄的效力,包括確定效力、放棄繼承者對遺產的管理義務和被放棄應繼份額的歸屬效力;三是一定情形下賦予債權人撤銷權,明確繼承權放棄無須經過配偶的同意,通過對《婚姻法》第17條的內容作出相應的修改來完善對配偶利益的保護。
[Abstract]:The system of abandonment of the right of succession is a property inheritance system which is of great significance to the smooth transfer of the heritage and the fair protection of the interests of the stakeholders in the inheritance. The current system of abandonment of inheritance in China is limited by the level of social and economic development, the background of the times and the legislative experience and technology at the beginning of the formulation of the current inheritance law. It is simple and principle. In the face of the rapid development of the social economy after more than 20 years, the increasingly complex legal relations and the idea of the people's inheritance have changed a certain extent. The shortage of the system is becoming more and more obvious, and the specific contents of the legislative system arrangement and system have to be further defined or perfected.
The article discusses the theoretical problems of the abandonment of the right of inheritance, expounds its development track, reveals the legislative purpose of the system, examines and compares the relevant legislation abroad, summarizes the useful experience of the relevant legislation of the system abroad, and combines the theoretical research of the present scholars on the abandonment of the right of inheritance, and examines the people of our country. On the basis of inheritance habits, social conditions and national conditions, this paper puts forward suggestions for improving the abandonment system of inheritance rights in China.
In addition to the introduction and conclusion, the body is divided into four parts.
The first part is an overview of the inheritance right abandonment system. First, it defines and analyzes the meaning and nature of the inheritance right, indicating that the inheritance right involved in this article is only the right of inheritance in the narrow sense, and then introduces the meaning of the abandonment of inheritance right, and compares the two legal concepts of the loss of inheritance rights through the abandonment of the confusing heritage and the loss of the right of inheritance. In the end, the development of the inheritance abandonment system is summarized. From the origin and development process of the system, it is pointed out that its legislative purpose is to inherit voluntariness, fairness and honesty and credit as the basic idea, and to strive for the equity protection of the interests of the parties involved in the inheritance.
The second part is the legislative introduction and analysis of the system of the abandonment of the right of inheritance abroad. It mainly investigates the relevant legislation of four countries in Germany, France, Japan and Switzerland. On the basis of comparison and analysis of the legislative system arrangement and specific content of the system of abandonment of the inheritance rights of various countries, the article summarizes the relevant legislation of various countries to pay attention to it. The people's inheritance habits and concepts in the system design strive to seek the beneficial experience of equitable protection of the interests of all parties in succession.
The third part is the present situation of the system of abandonment of the right of inheritance in our country. First, it introduces the general situation and basic content of the current system of abandonment of inheritance in our country, and points out that some of the current disputes arising from the abandonment of inheritance rights are puzzled, the judicial situation of the protection of the protection of the relevant rights and interests of the related subjects is lacking, and the present abandonment system of the right of inheritance is pointed out in our country. There is still room for improvement in terms of time, mode, limitation and effectiveness.
The fourth part is the perfection of the system of abandonment of the right of inheritance in our country. The main part is to analyze the suggestions and views of the domestic scholars and judicial practice workers to perfect the system of abandonment of inheritance, based on the current inheritance habits of our people and the actual situation of our country, and take the useful legislation of foreign countries as reference and give up the system of the abandonment of the right of inheritance in our country. The system arrangement and the content put forward perfect suggestion: first, in the system arrangement, put the content of the system into the general rules of the inheritance law and reflect its independence; two, it is necessary to perfect the agency of the abandonment of inheritance right in the content of the inheritance right abandonment system, and make clear that the abandonment of the right of succession should be made in written form within the time of determination, and not to be attached. The validity of the abandonment of the inheritance, including the determination of the effectiveness, the abandonment of the obligation to manage the inheritance and the effect of the attribution of the relinquish share; three is the revocation of the creditor in a certain situation, and the clear inheritance of the waiver without the consent of the spouse is made through the content of the seventeenth article of the marriage law. Corresponding amendments to improve the protection of the interests of spouses.
【學位授予單位】:西南政法大學
【學位級別】:碩士
【學位授予年份】:2014
【分類號】:D923.5
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前8條
1 王薇;;外國繼承的接受與放棄制度比較研究[J];重慶社會科學;2007年01期
2 王竹青;薛峰;;關于離婚時尚未分割遺產的處理 評《婚姻法》第17條第4項[J];法律適用;2010年12期
3 上海市東方公證處繼承實務與立法課題組;潘浩;;從公證事務看涉及繼承權放棄的立法完善繼承實務與立法系列研究之七[J];中國公證;2010年12期
4 李剛;;論夫妻一方婚內單獨放棄繼承的效力——兼評我國《繼承法》第25條與《婚姻法》第17條[J];廣西政法管理干部學院學報;2011年04期
5 王薇;;我國四法域接受與放棄繼承制度比較研究[J];蘭州學刊;2006年09期
6 趙娟;;繼承權放棄相關問題之探析[J];山東行政學院.山東省經濟管理干部學院學報;2010年04期
7 龍翼飛;制定中國民法典財產繼承編的思考與建議[J];中華女子學院學報;2002年04期
8 吳國平;;遺產繼承中債權人利益保護問題探究[J];政法論叢;2013年02期
本文編號:1969920
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/hyflw/1969920.html