本文選題：買(mǎi)賣(mài)合同 + 風(fēng)險(xiǎn)轉(zhuǎn)移��； 參考：《華東政法大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：買(mǎi)賣(mài)合同，是最常見(jiàn)的民商事法律關(guān)系之一，與整個(gè)日常生活、商事活動(dòng)及國(guó)際貿(mào)易息息相關(guān)。在買(mǎi)賣(mài)合同中，貨物發(fā)生毀損、滅失的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)如何劃分、有誰(shuí)承擔(dān)，關(guān)系到雙方當(dāng)事人的切身利益。因此，風(fēng)險(xiǎn)轉(zhuǎn)移規(guī)則，成了買(mǎi)賣(mài)合同一個(gè)核心的問(wèn)題。 各國(guó)法律、國(guó)際公約以及國(guó)際貿(mào)易慣例都極其重視風(fēng)險(xiǎn)轉(zhuǎn)移的規(guī)定，然而由于在風(fēng)險(xiǎn)轉(zhuǎn)移的理論上始終存在爭(zhēng)論，導(dǎo)致了各國(guó)相關(guān)立法也存在重大差異。我國(guó)的《中華人民共和國(guó)合同法》（以下簡(jiǎn)稱(chēng)《合同法》）在吸收先進(jìn)法律制度的基礎(chǔ)上，對(duì)買(mǎi)賣(mài)合同中風(fēng)險(xiǎn)轉(zhuǎn)移作了較為詳盡的規(guī)定，但是還遠(yuǎn)沒(méi)有實(shí)現(xiàn)對(duì)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)轉(zhuǎn)移問(wèn)題調(diào)整規(guī)范的系統(tǒng)化，尚有許多空白。因此，對(duì)買(mǎi)賣(mài)合同中風(fēng)險(xiǎn)轉(zhuǎn)移問(wèn)題進(jìn)行全面和深入地研究，不僅具有重要的理論價(jià)值，更具有深遠(yuǎn)的現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。 本文從貨物、風(fēng)險(xiǎn)和風(fēng)險(xiǎn)轉(zhuǎn)移的法律界定入手，歸納了各國(guó)理論學(xué)說(shuō)及立法現(xiàn)狀，結(jié)合我國(guó)《合同法》及《最高人民法院關(guān)于審理買(mǎi)賣(mài)合同糾紛案件適用法律問(wèn)題的解釋》的規(guī)定，分析了我國(guó)司法實(shí)務(wù)中所面臨的問(wèn)題，以期能對(duì)我國(guó)法律中風(fēng)險(xiǎn)轉(zhuǎn)移條款的完善提供一點(diǎn)建議。 本文第一章通過(guò)對(duì)不同學(xué)說(shuō)及法律規(guī)定的收集、歸納，著重論述了貨物、風(fēng)險(xiǎn)及風(fēng)險(xiǎn)轉(zhuǎn)移的概念，并且通過(guò)比較，梳理了風(fēng)險(xiǎn)轉(zhuǎn)移制度、合同責(zé)任制度、所有權(quán)制度之間的區(qū)別。 本文第二章闡述了風(fēng)險(xiǎn)轉(zhuǎn)移制度所采用的三大原則——合同成立主義、貨物所有權(quán)主義、貨物交付主義，詳細(xì)介紹這三種原則的起源、法理基礎(chǔ)及相關(guān)法律規(guī)定。 本文第三章著重介紹、比較了國(guó)際條約及我國(guó)國(guó)內(nèi)立法，，分析了正常情形、違約情形、特殊情形下《聯(lián)合國(guó)國(guó)際貨物銷(xiāo)售合同公約》及《合同法》對(duì)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)轉(zhuǎn)移問(wèn)題的規(guī)定，。 本文第四章以司法實(shí)務(wù)為切入點(diǎn)，對(duì)司法實(shí)務(wù)中風(fēng)險(xiǎn)轉(zhuǎn)移制度存在疑難問(wèn)題進(jìn)行了剖析，并且結(jié)合司法實(shí)踐，提出了對(duì)我國(guó)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)轉(zhuǎn)移制度的建議。
[Abstract]:The sale contract is one of the most common legal relations of civil and commercial affairs. It is closely related to the whole daily life, business activities and international trade. In the sale contract, the risk of the goods is destroyed and the risk of loss is divided, which is responsible for the vital interests of the parties. Question.
The laws of all countries, international conventions and international trade practices attach great importance to the regulation of risk transfer. However, there are still disputes in the theory of risk transfer, which lead to significant differences in relevant legislation in various countries. The People's Republic of China contract law of China (hereinafter referred to as < contract law >) is based on the absorption of the advanced legal system, The risk transfer in the sale contract is more detailed, but there are still many gaps in the systematization of the regulation of the risk transfer. Therefore, a thorough and thorough study of the risk transfer in the sale contract has not only an important theoretical value but also a far-reaching practical significance.
This article, starting with the legal definition of goods, risk and risk transfer, summarizes the theory and the status of legislation in various countries, and analyzes the problems faced by China's judicial practice in combination with the provisions of the interpretation of the "contract law" and "the interpretation of the Supreme People's Court on the application of legal problems in the case of dealing with the sale of contract disputes", in order to be able to be able to be in the law of our country. The improvement of the risk transfer clause provides some advice.
The first chapter, through the collection and induction of different doctrines and legal provisions, focuses on the concept of the transfer of goods, risks and risks, and through comparison, the system of risk transfer, the system of contract responsibility, and the difference between the ownership system are combed.
The second chapter of this paper expounds the three principles adopted in the system of risk transfer, namely, the doctrine of contract establishment, the doctrine of cargo ownership, and the delivery of goods, in which the origin of the three principles, the legal basis and the relevant legal provisions are described in detail.
The third chapter of this article focuses on the comparison of international treaties and domestic legislation, and analyses the normal situation, the situation of breach of contract, the provisions of the United Nations Convention on the contract for the international sale of goods and the contract law on the transfer of risk under special circumstances.
The fourth chapter of this article, taking the judicial practice as the breakthrough point, analyzes the difficult problems in the system of risk transfer in judicial practice, and puts forward some suggestions on the system of risk transfer in our country with the practice of judicature.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D923.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 王軼;論買(mǎi)賣(mài)合同標(biāo)的物毀損、滅失的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)負(fù)擔(dān)[J];北京科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1999年04期

2 趙家儀,陳華庭;我國(guó)買(mǎi)賣(mài)合同中的“交付”與“風(fēng)險(xiǎn)轉(zhuǎn)移”[J];法商研究;2003年02期

3 王傳麗;劃撥的概念與法律意義[J];政法論壇;2000年02期

4 吳志忠;美國(guó)《統(tǒng)一商法典》的貨物風(fēng)險(xiǎn)轉(zhuǎn)移條款[J];中南財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);1996年02期

本文編號(hào)：2085694