本文選題：標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化 + 標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化壟斷行為��； 參考：《湖南大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：在新經(jīng)濟的時代背景中，隨著“技術(shù)專利化，，專利標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化”歷史潮流的進(jìn)一步發(fā)展，標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化對于國家、企業(yè)的作用也日益凸顯。正是基于這樣的現(xiàn)實，標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化現(xiàn)象在國際、國內(nèi)層面都大量存在，對經(jīng)濟、社會的發(fā)展起到了重要作用。但是，由于現(xiàn)代標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化的自身特征，使其極易導(dǎo)致排除、限制市場競爭的壟斷行為，損害市場經(jīng)濟的效率。目前而言，標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化壟斷行為產(chǎn)生的根本原因有二：一是標(biāo)準(zhǔn)中包含具有私人獨占性的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)；二是對標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化管理機構(gòu)的行政權(quán)力缺乏有效控制。結(jié)合我國《反壟斷法》對壟斷行為類型的具體規(guī)定，標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化壟斷行為主要包括借助知識產(chǎn)權(quán)實施的壟斷協(xié)議、濫用市場支配地位以及濫用相關(guān)行政權(quán)力的行政性壟斷行為。在我國現(xiàn)行的法律體系中，對標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化壟斷行為具有控制作用的法律主要有《合同法》、《專利法》、《標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化法》及其相關(guān)條例，《對外貿(mào)易法》、《中外合資經(jīng)營企業(yè)法實施細(xì)則》、《技術(shù)引進(jìn)合同管理條例》等涉外法，《反不正當(dāng)競爭法》以及《反壟斷法》等。但是這些法律對控制標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化壟斷行為還存在明顯的缺陷，難以滿足現(xiàn)實社會的需求。因此，有必要進(jìn)一步完善我國標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化壟斷行為的法律控制制度。通過借鑒歐美等國對標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化壟斷行為進(jìn)行法律控制的實踐，結(jié)合標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化壟斷行為的特征,以及我國的實際國情，我們可以通過完善專利法、標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化法和反壟斷法來實現(xiàn)對標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化壟斷行為的有效控制。具體而言，在專利法方面，可以建立專利權(quán)濫用抗辯制度和專利惡意訴訟反賠制度，同時完善知識產(chǎn)權(quán)強制許可制度；在標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化法方面，應(yīng)該細(xì)化知識產(chǎn)權(quán)納入標(biāo)準(zhǔn)時的信息披露制度和建立嚴(yán)格的“必要專利”評估制度；在反壟斷法方面，需要制定規(guī)制標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化壟斷行為的專門立法和《知識產(chǎn)權(quán)行使的反壟斷法指南》。
[Abstract]:In the background of the new economy, with the further development of the historical trend of "technology patent and patent standardization", standardization has become more and more important to the state and enterprise. It is based on this reality that the standardization phenomenon exists at the international and domestic levels, and plays an important role in the development of economy and society. The own characteristics of modern standardization make it easy to lead to exclusion, restrict the monopoly behavior of market competition and damage the efficiency of market economy. At present, the basic reasons for the standardization monopoly are two: first, the standard contains the intellectual property with private exclusivity; and the two is the lack of effective administration power for standardized management institutions. In combination with the specific provisions of the antitrust law of China on the type of monopolistic behavior, standardized monopolies mainly include monopoly agreements carried out by the aid of intellectual property, abusing the dominant position of the market and the administrative monopoly of the abuse of relevant administrative power. In the current legal system of China, it has a control effect on the standardized monopoly behavior. The laws mainly include the contract law, the patent law, the standardization law and its related regulations, the foreign trade law, the detailed rules for the implementation of the Sino foreign joint venture law, the regulations on the management of the technology import contract and other foreign-related laws, the anti unfair competition law and the antitrust law, but these laws still have obvious defects in the control of standardized monopolies. It is difficult to meet the needs of the real society. Therefore, it is necessary to further improve the legal control system of the standardized monopoly behavior in our country. By drawing on the practice of the legal control of the standardized monopoly behavior in Europe and America and other countries, combining the characteristics of the standardized monopoly behavior and the actual situation of our country, we can standardize the patent law and standardize it. The law and antimonopoly law can realize the effective control of the standardized monopoly behavior. In particular, in the patent law, the patent abuse defense system and the patent malicious lawsuit anti claim system can be established, and the compulsory licensing system of intellectual property rights is perfected. In the standardization law, the information disclosure system of the intellectual property rights should be refined. And the establishment of a strict "necessary patent" evaluation system; in the anti-monopoly law, it is necessary to formulate special legislation to regulate the standardized monopolistic behavior and the guide to the exercise of anti trust law in the exercise of intellectual property.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D922.294

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 林平;馬克斌;王軼群;;反壟斷中的必需設(shè)施原則:美國和歐盟的經(jīng)驗[J];東岳論叢;2007年01期

2 朱翔華;王益誼;;發(fā)達(dá)國家標(biāo)準(zhǔn)與知識產(chǎn)權(quán)結(jié)合現(xiàn)狀及啟示[J];信息技術(shù)與標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化;2009年Z1期

3 張波;;日本公平交易委員會2005年指南及其對我國的啟示[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2006年06期

4 趙啟杉;黃良才;;技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)中的事先披露原則——VITA新專利政策介評[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2007年06期

5 呂明瑜;;技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)壟斷的法律控制[J];法學(xué)家;2009年01期

6 鄭友德;胡章怡;;歐盟知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用的反壟斷問題研究——以歐盟新修訂的《技術(shù)許可協(xié)議集體豁免條例》為中心[J];法學(xué)評論;2006年06期

7 張冬;;專利權(quán)濫用爭議的法律協(xié)調(diào)——以專利法與反壟斷法的關(guān)聯(lián)為視角[J];河北法學(xué);2009年06期

8 倪健;;技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)導(dǎo)致知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用的原因分析[J];決策與信息(財經(jīng)觀察);2008年05期

9 孫敬水;發(fā)達(dá)國家標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化戰(zhàn)略及其對我國的啟示[J];科研管理;2005年01期

10 趙曉光;;反壟斷法與知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護[J];世界貿(mào)易組織動態(tài)與研究;2008年02期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 邴輝;標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化法律制度研究[D];中國海洋大學(xué);2006年

2 吳瓊;技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)中的專利權(quán)濫用行為的法律規(guī)制[D];華東政法大學(xué);2008年

本文編號：2071049