本文選題：專利技術(shù)許可 + 不質(zhì)疑條款��； 參考：《科技進(jìn)步與對策》2011年09期

【摘要】：專利技術(shù)許可中的不質(zhì)疑條款可能掩蓋了無效專利的存在,使得被許可人為無效專利支出了不合理的許可費(fèi),并可能產(chǎn)生阻礙技術(shù)市場競爭和創(chuàng)新的后果,但不質(zhì)疑條款的存在也可能產(chǎn)生降低許可費(fèi)、促進(jìn)專利技術(shù)許可和運(yùn)用等積極后果。法律不應(yīng)對不質(zhì)疑條款作出禁止性規(guī)定,應(yīng)將其視為合同法上的可撤銷條款。對不質(zhì)疑條款的規(guī)制一般應(yīng)運(yùn)用專利法和合同法,而當(dāng)不質(zhì)疑條款產(chǎn)生非法限制競爭、阻礙技術(shù)進(jìn)步后果時,則應(yīng)運(yùn)用反壟斷法對其進(jìn)行規(guī)制。
[Abstract]:The no-doubt clause in the patent technology license may conceal the existence of the invalid patent, cause the licensee to pay unreasonable licence fee for the invalid patent, and may have the effect of hindering competition and innovation in the technology market. But the existence of the clause without doubt may have some positive consequences, such as reducing the license fee and promoting the licensing and application of patent technology. The law should not prohibit the non-challenge clause, but should regard it as a revocable clause in contract law. Patent law and contract law should be applied to the regulation of non-doubt clause, and when the clause has illegal restriction of competition and hinders the consequence of technological progress, anti-monopoly law should be used to regulate it.
【作者單位】： 南京理工大學(xué)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)學(xué)院;
【分類號】：D923.42

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 寧立志;李文謙;;不爭執(zhí)條款的反壟斷法分析[J];法學(xué)研究;2007年06期

【二級參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 岳賢平,顧海英;國外企業(yè)專利許可行為及其機(jī)理研究[J];中國軟科學(xué);2005年05期

，

本文編號：1876544