本文選題：一時(shí)性合同 + 繼續(xù)性合同��； 參考：《湖南師范大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：繼續(xù)性合同與一時(shí)性合同是現(xiàn)代合同法理論的分類。繼續(xù)性合同隨現(xiàn)代經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展,己成為經(jīng)濟(jì)交易中的重要方式。但是,有關(guān)繼續(xù)性合同的立法卻顯得有些滯后。為了有效規(guī)范繼續(xù)性合同在我國(guó)法律中的適用以及維護(hù)當(dāng)事人的合法利益和保障社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)秩序的順利進(jìn)行,我國(guó)應(yīng)借鑒國(guó)外有關(guān)繼續(xù)性合同的立法經(jīng)驗(yàn)以及結(jié)合自身的立法狀況從以下幾個(gè)方面對(duì)繼續(xù)性合同的相關(guān)制度進(jìn)行完善和規(guī)范：一是完善繼續(xù)性合同的訴訟時(shí)效；繼續(xù)性合同的每期履行具有獨(dú)立性,每期都是一個(gè)獨(dú)立的債權(quán),因此其訴訟時(shí)效應(yīng)按期計(jì)算。二是完善繼續(xù)性合同的效力制度；依據(jù)我國(guó)《合同法》的效力制度分析,解除制度溯及既往的法律效力不能適用于繼續(xù)性合同,繼續(xù)性合同的解除效力應(yīng)不能溯及既往,只對(duì)將來(lái)發(fā)生效力。三是完善情勢(shì)變更原則在繼續(xù)性合同中的適用；我國(guó)《合同法司法解釋二》中第26條對(duì)情勢(shì)變更原則的規(guī)定：“因適用情勢(shì)變更原則而引起合同消滅的,統(tǒng)一適用解除制度,”事實(shí)上目前我國(guó)解除制度的效力不能適用于繼續(xù)性合同,因此,對(duì)情勢(shì)變更原則適用于繼續(xù)性合同的規(guī)定應(yīng)予以完善。四是完善抗辯權(quán)在繼續(xù)性合同中的適用；依據(jù)我國(guó)《合同法》第66、67、68、69條對(duì)抗辯權(quán)的規(guī)定,同時(shí)履行抗辯權(quán)、不安抗辯權(quán)適用于繼續(xù)性合同時(shí)存在著一定的不足,所以,我國(guó)立法對(duì)這兩種抗辯權(quán)適用于繼續(xù)性合同時(shí)要進(jìn)行完善。五是完善繼續(xù)性合同的消滅制度；我國(guó)立法未區(qū)分一時(shí)性合同與繼續(xù)性合同,對(duì)二者的消滅制度采取了統(tǒng)一的解除制度,但是我國(guó)立法中的解除制度完全是圍繞著一時(shí)性合同設(shè)計(jì)的,因此,目前立法中的解除制度并不能適用于繼續(xù)性合同。而通過(guò)比較國(guó)外立法中繼續(xù)性合同的消滅制度以及結(jié)合我國(guó)立法的實(shí)際狀況,我國(guó)應(yīng)將終止制度作為繼續(xù)性合同的消滅制度進(jìn)行規(guī)范。總之,繼續(xù)性合同的規(guī)范在我國(guó)目前的《合同法》中存在明顯不足,我國(guó)立法有必要對(duì)其進(jìn)行完善。
[Abstract]:Continuing contract and temporary contract are the classification of modern contract law theory.With the development of modern economy, continuing contract has become an important way of economic transaction.However, the legislation on continuing contracts appears to lag behind.In order to effectively standardize the application of continuing contracts in Chinese law and safeguard the legitimate interests of the parties and ensure the smooth progress of social and economic order,Our country should learn from the legislation experience of foreign countries about continuing contract and combine its own legislative situation to perfect and standardize the relevant system of continuing contract from the following aspects: first, perfect the limitation of action of continuing contract;Each period of performance of a continuing contract is independent, and each period is an independent creditor's right, so its limitation period should be calculated on time.The second is to perfect the validity system of the continuing contract, according to the analysis of the validity system of the contract Law of our country, the legal effect of the rescission system retroactive cannot be applied to the continuing contract, and the rescinding effect of the continuing contract should not be retroactive.Only for the future.Third, to perfect the application of the principle of change of circumstances in continuing contracts. Article 26 of the Judicial interpretation of contract Law of our country stipulates the principle of change of circumstances: "if the contract is extinguished by the application of the principle of change of circumstances, the system of rescission shall be applied uniformly.""as a matter of fact, the validity of the current system of rescission in our country cannot be applied to continuing contracts, therefore, the provisions on the application of the principle of change of circumstances to continuing contracts should be perfected.Fourth, perfecting the application of the right of defense in the contract of continuance, according to the stipulation of Article 666776869 of the contract Law of our country on the right of defense, and performing the right of defense at the same time, the right of restless defense applies to the contract of continuance, therefore, there are some deficiencies in the application of the right of defense to the contract of continuance.Our country legislates to these two kinds of defense rights to apply to the continuation contract to carry on the consummation.Fifth, to perfect the system of elimination of continuing contracts, the legislation of our country has not distinguished temporary contracts from continuing contracts, and has adopted a unified system of rescission of the two systems.However, the system of rescission in the legislation of our country is completely designed around the temporary contract, therefore, the system of rescission in the current legislation can not be applied to the contract of continuance.By comparing the elimination system of continuing contract in foreign legislation and combining with the actual situation of our country's legislation, our country should regulate the termination system as the extinguishing system of continuing contract.In a word, the criterion of continuing contract is obviously deficient in contract Law of our country, it is necessary to perfect it in our country's legislation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D923.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 李玉文;論繼續(xù)性合同中的抗辯權(quán)[J];法商研究;2004年03期

2 崔建遠(yuǎn);;履行抗辯權(quán)探微[J];法學(xué)研究;2007年03期

3 萬(wàn)挺;;繼續(xù)性合同解除若干實(shí)務(wù)問(wèn)題探討[J];人民司法;2008年22期

4 欒志紅;關(guān)于繼續(xù)性合同的幾個(gè)問(wèn)題[J];法學(xué)論壇;2002年05期

5 屈茂輝;張紅;;繼續(xù)性合同:基于合同法理與立法技術(shù)的多重考量[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);2010年05期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 張紅;繼續(xù)性合同終止制度研究[D];湖南大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號(hào)：1745749