民商分立下合伙企業(yè)的主體地位研究
本文選題:民商分立 + 合伙企業(yè); 參考:《中國青年政治學(xué)院》2013年碩士論文
【摘要】:合伙企業(yè)法作為商事組織法的三駕馬車之一,在民商法部門中有著特殊的地位。我國既無商法典又無民法典的民商法立法現(xiàn)狀下,學(xué)者們對于民法與商法關(guān)系的討論激烈,商法的基本概念存在著模糊之處,因此在討論合伙企業(yè)的制度時存在著一些需要澄清的商法基礎(chǔ)理論研究上的理論背景問題。 本文第一部分著重解決合伙企業(yè)法的基礎(chǔ)理論問題,分析合伙企業(yè)法中的立法目的和價值理念,以民商分立為指引研究民商法中的主體制度,對比分析民事主體制度與商事主體制度,以此指引合伙企業(yè)的私法主體定位。 第二部分從合伙企業(yè)的概念和特征入手,考察我國《合伙企業(yè)法》規(guī)定的合伙企業(yè)的商事主體地位,,同時結(jié)合《民法通則》、《合同法》、《物權(quán)法》等相關(guān)法律規(guī)定探討合伙企業(yè)的民事主體地位,指出目前我國有關(guān)合伙企業(yè)立法在民事主體制度與商事主體制度的銜接上存在著解釋論上的困境。 第三部分分析合伙企業(yè)民事主體地位肯定說中的“法人說”、“次法人說”、“第三類民事主體說”,研究學(xué)者在肯定合伙企業(yè)民事主體地位前提下,提出的有關(guān)合伙企業(yè)民商事主體地位進(jìn)行協(xié)調(diào)的方案,提出在我國當(dāng)前立法模式下,不宜改造法人制度以使合伙企業(yè)法人化;“次法人說”過于關(guān)注商事主體責(zé)任形式,不利于民商事主體制度的協(xié)調(diào);我國目前在合同法、物權(quán)法中均體現(xiàn)出對合伙企業(yè)主體地位在民法總則中有突破傳統(tǒng)民事主體二元結(jié)構(gòu)的需求,合伙企業(yè)應(yīng)以“其他組織”的地位成為第三類民事主體。
[Abstract]:As one of the troika of commercial organization law, partnership enterprise law has a special position in civil and commercial law department.Under the current situation of civil and commercial law legislation which has neither commercial code nor civil code in our country, scholars have a heated discussion on the relationship between civil law and commercial law, and the basic concepts of commercial law are vague.Therefore, there are some theoretical background problems in the basic theory of commercial law that need to be clarified when discussing the system of partnership.The first part of this paper focuses on solving the basic theoretical problems of the partnership enterprise law, analyzes the legislative purpose and value concept of the partnership enterprise law, and studies the subject system in the civil and commercial law under the guidance of the separation of civil and commercial affairs.This paper compares the civil subject system with the commercial subject system to guide the position of the partnership private law subject.The second part, starting with the concept and characteristics of partnership, investigates the status of the commercial subject of partnership, which is stipulated in the Partnership Enterprise Law of our country.At the same time, it discusses the civil subject status of the partnership enterprise in accordance with the relevant laws and regulations, such as "General principles of Civil Law", "contract Law", "property Law", and so on.It is pointed out that there is a dilemma of interpretation in the connection between the civil subject system and the commercial subject system in the relevant partnership legislation in our country at present.The third part analyzes the "legal person theory", "sub-legal person theory" and "the third kind of civil subject theory" in the affirmation of the civil subject status of the partnership enterprise.Under the current legislation mode of our country, it is not appropriate to reform the legal person system to make the partnership enterprise legalized, and the "sub-legal person theory" pays too much attention to the form of commercial subject responsibility.It is unfavorable to the coordination of the civil and commercial subject system. At present, in the contract law and the real right law of our country, there is a need for the partnership subject status to break through the traditional dual structure of civil subject in the general principles of civil law.Partnership should become the third kind of civil subject with the status of "other organization".
【學(xué)位授予單位】:中國青年政治學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2013
【分類號】:D922.291.91
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 王榮平;;對德國民法法人制度的借鑒與反思[J];長春理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2011年12期
2 劉鄧軍;;論合伙不應(yīng)成為獨立民事主體[J];重慶社會科學(xué);2005年12期
3 王建文;;從商人到企業(yè):商人制度變革的依據(jù)與取向[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報);2009年05期
4 夏旭陽;非法人組織的法律地位及其立法模式——兼評《民法(草案)》總則有關(guān)條文[J];法學(xué)雜志;2005年04期
5 馬駿駒,余延滿;合伙民事主體地位的再探討[J];法學(xué)評論;1990年03期
6 廖凡;美國非公司型有限責(zé)任企業(yè)初探[J];法學(xué);2003年09期
7 童航;;《商事通則》:以商人為邏輯起點[J];福建法學(xué);2011年04期
8 申衛(wèi)星;;中國民法典的品性[J];法學(xué)研究;2006年03期
9 張勝先;第三民事主體——非法人組織的立法思考[J];求索;2002年04期
10 徐學(xué)鹿;論我國商法的現(xiàn)代化[J];山東法學(xué);1999年02期
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條
1 吳曉靜;民事法律關(guān)系網(wǎng)絡(luò)論[D];西南政法大學(xué);2008年
2 陶政;商法價值研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2008年
本文編號:1738509
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/hetongqiyue/1738509.html