本文選題：贈與合同 + 任意撤銷權��； 參考：《山西大學》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：一般來說,根據(jù)“契約必守”原則,合同一經(jīng)成立生效便對當事人產(chǎn)生法律拘束力,當事人不可以任意撤銷。但贈與合同的單務、無償性決定了贈與人的給付不能獲得任何報償且受贈人的獲益無需付出任何代價,法律為保護善良贈與人的利益,特賦予贈與人在一定條件下改變自己初衷的權利。贈與人任意撤銷權制度是在承認贈與合同諾成性、非要式性的基礎上,為保護贈與人利益作出的特殊規(guī)定,這種立法模式與將贈與合同規(guī)定為實踐合同或要式合同的立法模式具有相同的立法目的,都是平衡贈與合同雙方當事人的利益。 除引言、結論外,本文共分四部分來分析研究贈與人任意撤銷權制度,概述如下： 第一部分概括論述贈與人任意撤銷權制度。首先簡要闡述了贈與人任意撤銷權制度的含義和性質,然后介紹了贈與人任意撤銷權與相關法律概念的異同,并對贈與人任意撤銷權的法理依據(jù)與制度提前提作了詳細論述。 第二部分比較分析國內外關于贈與人仃意撤銷權的立法模式,主要分為規(guī)定有任意撤銷權制度的立法模式與沒有規(guī)定任意撤銷權的兩種立法模式,前者主要介紹了日本民法、我國臺灣地區(qū)及大陸地區(qū)民法的立法模式,后者主要介紹了羅馬法、德國法、法國法的立法模式,并對以上立法模式進行了比較分析。 第三部分指出我國贈與人任意撤銷權制度存在的立法缺陷。具體包括缺乏對行使任意撤銷權的必要限制、缺乏對受贈人利益的保護機制、《合同法》相關條款規(guī)定不完善等。 第四部分詳細闡述完善我國贈與人任意撤銷權制度的立法建議。包括限制贈與人任意撤銷權的行使方式和行使期間,擴大不可任意撤銷合同的范圍,規(guī)定任意撤銷權的行使主體包括受贈人,建立對受贈人信賴利益損失的賠償制度,對《合同法》相關條款的完善等。
[Abstract]:Generally speaking, according to the principle of "contract must be adhered to", once the contract is established and effective, it has legal binding force on the parties, and the parties can not cancel it arbitrarily.But the single service of the gift contract, free of charge, determines that the donator can not obtain any reward for the benefit of the donator and that the benefit of the grantee does not have to pay any price. The law protects the interests of the good donator.The donator is given the right to change his original intention under certain conditions.The system of the donator's right of arbitrary rescission is a special provision for the protection of the donator's interests on the basis of the recognition of the nature of the donation contract and the necessity of the nature of the donation.This kind of legislative model has the same legislative purpose as the legislative mode of stipulating the gift contract as the practice contract or the essential contract, which is to balance the interests of both parties to the gift contract.In addition to the introduction and conclusion, this paper is divided into four parts to analyze and study the system of the donator's right of arbitrary rescission, which is summarized as follows:The first part generalizes the system of the donator's right of arbitrary rescission.This paper first briefly expounds the meaning and nature of the system of the donator's right of arbitrary revocation, then introduces the similarities and differences between the donator's right of arbitrary revocation and the relevant legal concepts, and discusses in detail the legal basis and system of the donator's right of arbitrary revocation in advance.In the second part, the author compares and analyzes the legislative models of the right of revocation of the right of donating people at home and abroad, which are mainly divided into two legislative models: one is the system of the right to revoke arbitrarily and the other is the one that does not. The former mainly introduces the civil law of Japan.The latter mainly introduces the legislative models of Roman law, German law and French law, and makes a comparative analysis of the above legislative models.The third part points out the legislative defects of the system of freewill rescission of donators in our country.It includes the lack of necessary restrictions on the exercise of the right of arbitrary rescission, the lack of a mechanism to protect the interests of the grantee, the imperfection of the relevant provisions of contract Law, etc.The fourth part elaborates the legislative suggestion of consummating the system of donator's right of arbitrary rescission in our country.Including restricting the way and duration of the exercise of the donator's right of arbitrary rescission, expanding the scope of the contract which cannot be revoked arbitrarily, stipulating that the subject of the exercise of the right of arbitrary revocation includes the addressee, and establishing a system of compensation for the loss of trust interests of the recipient.To the contract law related clause consummation and so on.
【學位授予單位】：山西大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D923.6

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前1條

1 姬新江,趙家琪;對贈與合同撤銷的法律思考[J];暨南學報(人文科學與社會科學版);2004年06期

，

本文編號：1738086