發(fā)布時間：2018-04-09 08:03

  本文選題：商業(yè)特許經(jīng)營　切入點：合同解除　出處：《西南政法大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：商業(yè)特許經(jīng)營模式隨著我國市場經(jīng)濟的發(fā)展而涌入各行各業(yè)，，作用尤顯。商業(yè)特許經(jīng)營合同作為商業(yè)特許經(jīng)營模式運作的橋梁，其解除關(guān)系到合同當(dāng)事人及其與公眾之間的利益平衡。 首先，本文從商業(yè)特許經(jīng)營的概念入手界定商業(yè)特許經(jīng)營合同的法律特征，認(rèn)為商業(yè)特許經(jīng)營合同是平等主體之間自愿、平等協(xié)商的結(jié)果，是意思自治的體現(xiàn)。該合同以特許經(jīng)營權(quán)為內(nèi)容，即是一種包括了商標(biāo)權(quán)、專利權(quán)、商業(yè)秘密、著作權(quán)、商業(yè)外觀權(quán)等知識產(chǎn)權(quán)為內(nèi)容的權(quán)利束。此外文章運用商業(yè)外觀的概念，試圖給予整體上有標(biāo)示作用、非功能性的商業(yè)外觀以權(quán)利，保護具有識別作用、非知名的卻蘊含特許人一定創(chuàng)造性或財力、人力、物力投入的利益，欲以商業(yè)外觀權(quán)的方式保護其權(quán)益。文章通過利益平衡理論剖析特許經(jīng)營合同的解除目的和功能，突顯利益平衡理論對特許經(jīng)營合同解除的重要性，又從合同法和知識產(chǎn)權(quán)法的角度出發(fā)，論證了特許人、受許人、社會公眾三者利益平衡。 接著，文章根據(jù)合同法的一般原理，首先回答了合同解除的溯及力問題和損害賠償范圍問題；其次，基于特許經(jīng)營合同解除權(quán)發(fā)生原因的不同，根據(jù)商業(yè)特許經(jīng)營合同的特殊性，對特許經(jīng)營合同解除的行使進行類型化研究，闡述約定解除、法定解除和特許人解除、受許人解除。同時，對合同解除后費用返還、退貨、損害賠償、知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護四個方面進行詳細闡述，對特許經(jīng)營加盟費的性質(zhì)給予明確。特許人和受許人在商業(yè)特許經(jīng)營合同解除后，同樣需要秉承誠實信用原則履行后合同義務(wù)，切實維護雙方的合法利益。在保護特許人知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的同時，也要對受許人給予公平對待，依照法律或者根據(jù)約定解決合同解除問題，平衡雙方利益。此外，針對解除權(quán)消滅事由，文章從期限屆滿未行使、權(quán)利失效、拋棄、違約方補救四個方面論述了商業(yè)特許經(jīng)營合同解除權(quán)的消滅。 再者，本文著重對商業(yè)特許經(jīng)營合同解除的特殊制度“冷卻期”和信息披露制度進行專門論述。通過比較法研究，對冷卻期制度和信息披露制度有了更深的了解外，發(fā)現(xiàn)我國商業(yè)特許經(jīng)營合同解除制度存在許多不足與缺陷，如冷卻期期限模糊、信息披露制度不完全、缺乏操作性、起算時間單一等。 最后，本文根據(jù)上文分析得出結(jié)論，在八個方面對我國商業(yè)特許經(jīng)營合同的解除提出完善建議，如提升法律位階，盡快制定商業(yè)特許經(jīng)營法律；承認(rèn)電子形式的合同制度；詳細規(guī)定合同解除事由；完善冷卻期和信息披露制度；完善其他配套措施等，意欲在我國形成先進、科學(xué)的商業(yè)特許經(jīng)營體系。
[Abstract]:With the development of China's market economy, the business franchise model has been pouring into various industries, especially in effect.As a bridge to the operation of commercial franchise model, the dissolution of commercial franchise contract is related to the balance of interests between the parties to the contract and the public.First of all, this paper defines the legal characteristics of commercial franchise contract from the concept of commercial franchise, and holds that commercial franchise contract is the result of voluntary and equal negotiation between equal subjects and the embodiment of will autonomy.The contract takes the franchise as the content, that is, a kind of intellectual property rights including trademark rights, patent rights, trade secrets, copyright, commercial appearance rights and so on.In addition, using the concept of commercial appearance, the article tries to give the whole marked, non-functional commercial appearance as rights, protection and identification, but the unknown contains the franchisor's creative or financial resources, manpower, etc.The interest of material resources investment, want to protect its rights and interests in the way of commercial appearance right.This paper analyzes the purpose and function of franchise contract through the theory of interest balance, highlights the importance of the theory of interest balance to the termination of franchise contract, and from the angle of contract law and intellectual property law, demonstrates the franchisee, the franchisee, the franchisee, the franchisee, the franchisee and the franchisee.The interests of the public are balanced.Then, according to the general principle of contract law, the article first answers the retroactive effect of contract rescission and the scope of damage compensation; secondly, based on the different causes of the right to rescind the franchise contract,According to the particularity of the commercial franchise contract, this paper makes a typological study on the exercise of the rescission of the franchise contract, and expounds on the agreed rescission, the legal discharge and the franchisor's dissolution, and the release of the franchisee.At the same time, the paper expounds in detail four aspects of the cost return, return, damages and intellectual property protection after the termination of the contract, and gives a clear definition of the nature of the franchise fee.The franchisor and the franchisee, after the termination of the commercial franchise contract, also need to uphold the principle of good faith to fulfill the obligations of the contract and protect the legitimate interests of both parties.While protecting the franchisor's intellectual property rights, the franchisee should be treated fairly, and the termination of the contract should be settled according to the law or according to the agreement, and the interests of both parties should be balanced.In addition, aiming at the reason of extinguishing the right of rescission, this paper discusses the extinguishment of the right of rescission of the commercial franchise contract from four aspects: the expiration of the deadline, the invalidation of the right, the abandonment of the right, and the remedy of the breaching party.Furthermore, this paper focuses on the special system of termination of commercial franchise contract "cooling-off period" and information disclosure system.Through the comparative study, we have a deeper understanding of the cooling period system and the information disclosure system, and find that there are many shortcomings and defects in the cancellation system of the commercial franchise contract in China, such as the ambiguity of the cooling-off period and the incomplete information disclosure system.Lack of maneuverability, starting time single, etc.Finally, according to the above analysis, this paper draws a conclusion, in eight aspects of the termination of commercial franchise contracts in China, such as to improve the legal hierarchy, as soon as possible to formulate commercial franchise law, to recognize the electronic form of the contract system;In order to form an advanced and scientific commercial franchise system in our country, we should specify the reasons for the termination of the contract, perfect the cooling period and information disclosure system, and perfect other supporting measures.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D923.6

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 陳雪娜;;論商業(yè)外觀的法律保護[J];法制與社會;2011年15期

2 樊彥敏;;特許經(jīng)營中的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)問題研究[J];湖南科技學(xué)院學(xué)報;2009年10期

3 丁建國;;商業(yè)特許經(jīng)營合同的法律探討[J];學(xué)習(xí)論壇;2009年10期

4 吳漢東;財產(chǎn)的非物質(zhì)化革命與革命的非物質(zhì)財產(chǎn)法[J];中國社會科學(xué);2003年04期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 陸川;經(jīng)濟法視野下商業(yè)特許經(jīng)營法律制度研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2009年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 王瑩;論合同解除[D];吉林大學(xué);2005年

2 韓興娟;特許經(jīng)營信息披露制度兩論[D];華東政法學(xué)院;2006年

3 倪聯(lián)輝;特許經(jīng)營合同研究[D];對外經(jīng)濟貿(mào)易大學(xué);2006年

4 戴志群;特許經(jīng)營中知識產(chǎn)權(quán)問題研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2007年

5 楊迪之;商業(yè)特許經(jīng)營的競爭法規(guī)制[D];西南政法大學(xué);2008年

6 胡琳潔;商業(yè)特許經(jīng)營信息披露法律制度研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2010年

本文編號：1725549