本文選題：優(yōu)先購(gòu)買權(quán)　切入點(diǎn)：房屋租賃　出處：《華東政法大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：房屋承租人的優(yōu)先購(gòu)買權(quán)是指房屋承租人在一定的條件下對(duì)其所租賃的房屋享有較之一般的購(gòu)買人優(yōu)先購(gòu)買的權(quán)利。優(yōu)先購(gòu)買權(quán)在羅馬法的時(shí)期業(yè)已存在，并經(jīng)由《法國(guó)民法典》、《德國(guó)民法典》和《瑞士民法典》的繼承和發(fā)展。我國(guó)《合同法》第230條、《最高人民法院關(guān)于審理城鎮(zhèn)房屋租賃合同糾紛案件具體應(yīng)用法律若干問(wèn)題的解釋》第21-24條等均對(duì)于房屋承租人的優(yōu)先購(gòu)買權(quán)做出了規(guī)定，但是從很多方面看，我國(guó)的法律仍有許多不完備的地方。尤其是在審判實(shí)踐中仍有許多疏漏和不足的地方，法律對(duì)該問(wèn)題的相關(guān)規(guī)定也不夠完備，對(duì)若干重要問(wèn)題也沒有作出相應(yīng)的規(guī)定，個(gè)別制度設(shè)計(jì)亦尚有值得探討之處。 在現(xiàn)實(shí)經(jīng)濟(jì)交往中，由于房屋所有權(quán)人將已經(jīng)出租的房屋出售給第三人而與承租人產(chǎn)生糾紛，或損害承租人優(yōu)先購(gòu)買權(quán)的案件時(shí)有發(fā)生。而在審判實(shí)踐中由于對(duì)房屋承租人優(yōu)先購(gòu)買權(quán)的法律性質(zhì)認(rèn)識(shí)不一，導(dǎo)致對(duì)案件的實(shí)體處理不盡相同。本文試圖結(jié)合現(xiàn)行的法律，，通過(guò)對(duì)承租人的優(yōu)先購(gòu)買權(quán)性質(zhì)的法理探討，并結(jié)合相關(guān)的實(shí)際案例進(jìn)行分析，以期對(duì)審判實(shí)踐有所裨益。
[Abstract]:The lessee's right of pre emption refers to the lessee under certain conditions of the rental housing have than the general purchase priority purchase rights. Preemption in the Rome law period already exists, and through the "French Civil Code", "inheritance and development of the German Civil Code > and < Swiss people. Our < code > < > 230th of contract law, the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues concerning the specific application of law in the trial of urban housing lease contract dispute cases the interpretation of article 21-24 of the" preemptive right of the lessee to make provisions, but in many ways, the law of our country is still there are many imperfect places. Especially there are still many omissions and deficiencies in the judicial practice, the relevant provisions of the legal issues is not complete, on a number of important issues do not make corresponding regulations, individual system design is also There is something worth discussing.
In the real economic exchanges, the owner of the house will be rental housing has been sold to third people and a dispute with the lessee, the lessee preemption or damage cases have occurred. But in judicial practice because of the legal nature of the lessee's preemption is not a recognized entity, to deal with the case is not the same. This paper tries to combine the existing law to explore the legal nature of the right to buy the lessee's priority, and combined with the actual case related analysis, in order to benefit the judicial practice.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D923.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 寧紅麗;論承租人的優(yōu)先購(gòu)買權(quán)[J];廣西社會(huì)科學(xué);2004年08期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 謝立兵;住宅租賃權(quán)對(duì)抗效力研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2009年

本文編號(hào)：1724901