本文選題：合同法　切入點(diǎn)：風(fēng)險(xiǎn)負(fù)擔(dān)　出處：《法學(xué)研究》2010年01期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：學(xué)說(shuō)和立法草案多有以合同解除制度吸收風(fēng)險(xiǎn)負(fù)擔(dān)規(guī)則的主張,在我國(guó)司法實(shí)踐中,兩者的交錯(cuò)也帶來(lái)了法律適用上的困惑。合同解除制度和風(fēng)險(xiǎn)負(fù)擔(dān)規(guī)則具有各自的優(yōu)勢(shì)領(lǐng)域,解除一元論和并存模式是目前具有代表性的兩種制度安排。在我國(guó)合同法采并存模式的背景下,風(fēng)險(xiǎn)由債務(wù)人負(fù)擔(dān)時(shí)可擇一適用,但需就解除權(quán)期間、清算關(guān)系中的訴訟時(shí)效、風(fēng)險(xiǎn)負(fù)擔(dān)抗辯等問(wèn)題作出特別處理。風(fēng)險(xiǎn)由債權(quán)人負(fù)擔(dān)時(shí)應(yīng)當(dāng)否定債權(quán)人的解除權(quán)。瑕疵給付時(shí)的解除與風(fēng)險(xiǎn)負(fù)擔(dān)應(yīng)適用合同法第148條、第149條的規(guī)定,但在立法論上有重新斟酌的必要。持續(xù)性合同可類推適用租賃合同的規(guī)定或部分解除制度。清算關(guān)系中的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)分配可有限制地準(zhǔn)用合同法第148條的規(guī)定。
[Abstract]:Most of the doctrine and draft legislation have the idea of absorbing the rules of risk burden by the system of rescission of contract. In the judicial practice of our country, The interlacing of the two also leads to confusion in the application of the law. The system of rescission of contracts and the rules of risk burden have their respective advantages. Dissolution monism and coexistence mode are two kinds of representative institutional arrangements at present. Under the background of concurrent mode adopted in contract law of our country, the risk can be shouldered by the debtor, but the limitation of action in the liquidation relationship during the period of rescission right is needed. When the risk is borne by the creditor, the dissolving right of the creditor shall be denied. The provisions of Article 148 and Article 149 of the contract Law shall apply to the discharge and the risk burden of the defective payment. However, there is a need for reconsideration in the legislative theory. Continuing contracts can be applied by analogy to the provisions of lease contracts or partial rescission, and risk distribution in liquidation relationships may be limited by the provisions of Article 148 of the contract Law.
【作者單位】： 浙江大學(xué)光華法學(xué)院;
【基金】：浙江省哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)規(guī)劃課題“產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)升級(jí)背景下的服務(wù)合同風(fēng)險(xiǎn)負(fù)擔(dān)問(wèn)題研究”(項(xiàng)目號(hào):09CGFX004YBQ) 2008年度浙江省“錢江人才計(jì)劃”重點(diǎn)項(xiàng)目“服務(wù)合同研究”(項(xiàng)目號(hào):QJC0801003) 浙江大學(xué)優(yōu)秀青年教師資助計(jì)劃(紫金計(jì)劃) 國(guó)家“211工程”三期重點(diǎn)學(xué)科建設(shè)項(xiàng)目“轉(zhuǎn)型期法治的理論、制度與實(shí)證研究”的階段性成果之一。
【分類號(hào)】：D923.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 易軍;違約責(zé)任與風(fēng)險(xiǎn)負(fù)擔(dān)[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年03期

2 崔建遠(yuǎn);合同解除的疑問(wèn)與釋答[J];法學(xué);2005年09期

3 盧諶;杜景林;;論合同解除的學(xué)理及現(xiàn)代規(guī)制——以國(guó)際統(tǒng)一法和民族國(guó)家為視角[J];法學(xué);2006年04期

4 崔建遠(yuǎn);解除權(quán)問(wèn)題的疑問(wèn)與釋答(下篇)[J];政治與法律;2005年04期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 清華大學(xué)法學(xué)院副教授、法學(xué)博士 韓世遠(yuǎn);[N];人民法院報(bào);2001年

【共引文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李騰宇;論締約過(guò)失責(zé)任法律制度[J];安陽(yáng)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2004年01期

2 蔡志猛;;簡(jiǎn)論出賣人物之瑕疵擔(dān)保責(zé)任的性質(zhì)[J];安陽(yáng)工學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年05期

3 朱曉U，

本文編號(hào)：1591176