dispute settlement body 的翻譯結(jié)果
本文關(guān)鍵詞:分歧與和諧:析WTO爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制的法律適用,,由筆耕文化傳播整理發(fā)布。
在分類學(xué)科中查詢 所有學(xué)科 國(guó)際法 貿(mào)易經(jīng)濟(jì) 法理、法史 歷史查詢
dispute settlement body
But on the other hand, in practice, GATT/WTO dispute settlement body sets strict limitations on the members when they are exercising such a right.
但另一方面,GATT/WTO爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)構(gòu)在實(shí)踐中對(duì)成員方行使這種“環(huán)保例外權(quán)”設(shè)定了嚴(yán)格的限制。
短句來(lái)源
On the Power of Legal Interpretation of the WTO Dispute Settlement Body
試論WTO爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)構(gòu)的法律解釋權(quán)
短句來(lái)源
In China,we can only adopt the legislationtransforming way in complying with and implementation of WTO agreements and cannot apply the agreements in our law-enforcing and judicial practice or even accord them priority,in the perspective of either the relations between international law and domestic law or the validity status of international treaties in China's domestic laws,according to either the nature and requirements of WTO agreements or the practice of the main WTO member countries and the position of Dispute Settlement Body.
無(wú)論從國(guó)際法與國(guó)內(nèi)法的關(guān)系還是從我國(guó)有關(guān)國(guó)際條約在國(guó)內(nèi)法中的效力地位的角度,無(wú)論是根據(jù)WTO協(xié)定的性質(zhì)和要求還是WTO主要成員的實(shí)踐和爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)構(gòu)的主張,我們都只能采用轉(zhuǎn)化立法方式遵守和實(shí)施WTO協(xié)定,在執(zhí)法和司法活動(dòng)中不能適用WTO協(xié)定,更不能賦予其優(yōu)先效力。
短句來(lái)源
The dispute settlement body plays important role in this mechanism.
在該機(jī)制中,爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)構(gòu)扮演了重要角色。
短句來(lái)源
This paper examines international agricultural trade disputes through Dispute Settlement Body of WTO since WTO came into existence and a logistic regression is explored to find out the eventual factors which determine the disputes.
本文以世貿(mào)組織成立以來(lái)訴諸WTO爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)構(gòu)(DSB)的農(nóng)產(chǎn)品爭(zhēng)端為主要研究對(duì)象,運(yùn)用Logistic回歸模型對(duì)農(nóng)產(chǎn)品貿(mào)易爭(zhēng)端發(fā)生的影響因素進(jìn)行了實(shí)證研究。
短句來(lái)源
更多
Economic Analysis on the Mechanism of GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement Body
GATT/WTO爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制的經(jīng)濟(jì)分析
短句來(lái)源
Deficiencies and Problems of the Mechanism of the WTO Dispute Settlement Body
WTO爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制的缺陷與問(wèn)題
短句來(lái)源
WTO and its trade dispute settlement body, have support powerful legal safeguard mechanism which for maintain international economic order and solve international trade dispute in the world.
WTO及其爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制的建立,則為維護(hù)國(guó)際經(jīng)濟(jì)秩序和解決國(guó)際貿(mào)易糾紛提供了強(qiáng)有力的法律保障機(jī)制。
短句來(lái)源
Discrepancy and Reconciliation: An Analysis on the Applicable Law for the WTO Dispute Settlement Body
分歧與和諧:析WTO爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制的法律適用
短句來(lái)源
Evaluation of the Dispute Settlement Body of the WTO and Responsive Measures
WTO爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制的評(píng)價(jià)和我國(guó)的應(yīng)對(duì)策略
短句來(lái)源
更多
With respect to GATT 1947, it appears that even if Section 337 is consistent with the Article 3 national treatment provision, it may not meet the stringent standards of Article 20, as developed through WTO Dispute Settlement Body practice.
就337條款與GATT 1947之間的關(guān)系而言,我們可以看出,即使337條款能夠符合GATT第3條國(guó)民待遇原則,它也不會(huì)符合第20條嚴(yán)格的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。
短句來(lái)源
On the Discretion of the WTO Dispute Settlement Body
DSB的自由裁量權(quán)探析
短句來(lái)源
GATT/WTO dispute settlement body doesn't uphold the position to take PPMs standard as one standard in defining"like product".
但考慮到產(chǎn)品的PPMs可能會(huì)對(duì)生產(chǎn)國(guó)甚至是全球的環(huán)境造成不利影響,通過(guò)GATT1994第20條b款或g款的適用,使以PPMs標(biāo)準(zhǔn)為基礎(chǔ)的貿(mào)易限制措施獲得合法性是一種兩全之計(jì)。
短句來(lái)源
The second part is the longest, telling the divarication in the Dispute Settlement Body of WTO.
第三部分,即本文的重點(diǎn)部分,分析《伯德修正案》引起爭(zhēng)議的原因,闡述《伯德修正案》與傾銷和補(bǔ)貼的關(guān)系。
短句來(lái)源
The article analyzes the relevant clauses and solutions thereto in the Dispute Settlement Body,and puts forward some positive responsive strategies upon China's accession to the WTO.
本文通過(guò)對(duì)該類條款的分析及就WTO對(duì)這類爭(zhēng)端解決實(shí)踐的探討,提出了中國(guó)加入WTO后對(duì)該類條款的積極應(yīng)對(duì)之策。
短句來(lái)源
更多
查詢“dispute settlement body”譯詞為用戶自定義的雙語(yǔ)例句
我想查看譯文中含有:的雙語(yǔ)例句
為了更好的幫助您理解掌握查詢?cè)~或其譯詞在地道英語(yǔ)中的實(shí)際用法,我們?yōu)槟鷾?zhǔn)備了出自英文原文的大量英語(yǔ)例句,供您參考。
dispute settlement body
Among WTO members, the findings of a dispute settlement body would presumably differ depending on the status of the target under the Kyoto Protocol.
It is analogous to the standard of proof imposed by US administrative law, and is also consistent with the position of the European Union and the holdings of the WTO Dispute Settlement Body in the beef hormones case.
Furthermore, Member States have the duty to inform and consult the Community institutions prior of bringing a case before another dispute settlement body.
Accordingly, EU Member States involved in a dispute that potentially raises issues of Community law are not allowed to bring the case before a dispute settlement body other than the ECJ.
We ask that you circulate this notification to the relevant Councils and Committees, as well as to the Dispute Settlement Body.
更多
Judicial review has been generally adopted by modern law governed countries. After China's accession into the WTO, other member governments may resort to the dispute settlement body of the WTO for a settlement if the Chinese court fails to enforce the power of judicial review fairly and independently. The WTO agreements such as "General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994", "Agreement on Implementation of Article VI of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994" (about dumping), "General Agreement...
Judicial review has been generally adopted by modern law governed countries. After China's accession into the WTO, other member governments may resort to the dispute settlement body of the WTO for a settlement if the Chinese court fails to enforce the power of judicial review fairly and independently. The WTO agreements such as "General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994", "Agreement on Implementation of Article VI of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994" (about dumping), "General Agreement on Trade in Services", and "Trade related Agreenent on Intellectual Property Rights" have formulated definite provisions regarding judicial review. "Protocol on the Accession of the People's Republic of China" also provides regulations about judicial review. Still, the laws of the People's Republic of China such as Administrative Procedure Law, Regulations on Administrative Reconsideration, Patent Law (Amended), and Trademark Law (Amended) have rules concerning judicial review. The differences mainly exist in the scope of application, the protection of the plaintiff, the rights of parties concerned, and the extension and the procedure of the review itself. Therefore, after the accession, one of the challenges China will probably face is how to implement judicial review in line with China's national conditions as well as WTO rules.
司法審查是現(xiàn)代法治國(guó)家所普遍采用的一項(xiàng)法律制度。入世后 ,如果法院不能真正獨(dú)立公正地行使司法審查權(quán) ,其他成員可據(jù)此尋求世貿(mào)組織爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制予以裁決。世貿(mào)協(xié)議如《關(guān)稅與貿(mào)易總協(xié)定 1994》、《反傾銷協(xié)議》、《服務(wù)貿(mào)易總協(xié)定》、《與貿(mào)易有關(guān)的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)協(xié)議》等都對(duì)司法審查作明確規(guī)定 ;中國(guó)加入世貿(mào)組織法律文件對(duì)司法審查也作了規(guī)定。中國(guó)《行政訴訟法》、《行政復(fù)議法》、《專利法》(修改 )、《商標(biāo)法》(修改 )也都有規(guī)定 ,但與世貿(mào)法律規(guī)則相比 ,差別很大。主要在可訴權(quán)范圍不一、原告訴權(quán)保護(hù)范圍不一、當(dāng)事人權(quán)利范圍不一、司法審查范圍廣度不一、司法審查程序不一。如何使司法審查符合我國(guó)國(guó)情 ,又與世貿(mào)法律規(guī)則相吻合 ,是我國(guó)入世后面臨的法律難題之一
The environmental clauses are restrictive ones written in regard to free trade for purposes of environnmental protection. They are stipulated in a number of agreements with in the WTO legal system, having an influence on the theories and practices in this connection. The article analyzes the relevant clauses and solutions thereto in the Dispute Settlement Body,and puts forward some positive responsive strategies upon China's accession to the WTO.
WTO環(huán)保條款是一類因環(huán)境保護(hù)的目的而對(duì)自由貿(mào)易所作的限制性條款。它被規(guī)定在WTO若干協(xié)議中,并對(duì)理論和實(shí)踐產(chǎn)生了重要影響。本文通過(guò)對(duì)該類條款的分析及就WTO對(duì)這類爭(zhēng)端解決實(shí)踐的探討,提出了中國(guó)加入WTO后對(duì)該類條款的積極應(yīng)對(duì)之策。
The paper mainly expounds the panels of experts under the WTO dispute settlement mechanism. From the point of common connections, the whole dispute settlement body is analyzed and studied. In the exposition, the paper emphatically probes into the emergence and development, procedures, the positive significance of settlement pattern, the problems of further development of panels of experts and its significance to China.
以WTO爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制下的專家組為核心展開論述 ,并從普遍聯(lián)系的角度出發(fā) ,在一定層面上對(duì)整個(gè)爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制進(jìn)行分析、研究。其中 ,著重就專家組的產(chǎn)生和發(fā)展、有關(guān)程序、其斷案模式的積極意義、其進(jìn)一步發(fā)展所面臨的問(wèn)題及其對(duì)我國(guó)的意義等幾方面內(nèi)容進(jìn)行了探討。
 
<< 更多相關(guān)文摘
相關(guān)查詢
CNKI小工具
在英文學(xué)術(shù)搜索中查有關(guān)dispute settlement body的內(nèi)容
在知識(shí)搜索中查有關(guān)dispute settlement body的內(nèi)容
在數(shù)字搜索中查有關(guān)dispute settlement body的內(nèi)容
在概念知識(shí)元中查有關(guān)dispute settlement body的內(nèi)容
在學(xué)術(shù)趨勢(shì)中查有關(guān)dispute settlement body的內(nèi)容
本文關(guān)鍵詞:分歧與和諧:析WTO爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制的法律適用,由筆耕文化傳播整理發(fā)布。
本文編號(hào):160058
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/falvtiaokuanjiedu/160058.html