【摘要】：業(yè)主大會會議往往通過書面征求意見的形式召開,對于已送達的征求表決票,業(yè)主若在規(guī)定的時間內(nèi)不反饋意見,視為同意,此規(guī)定被稱為"未投票視為有效同意"條款。實踐中法院無一例外地支持此條款的效力,但該條款效力是存在問題的,其癥結(jié)在于中國法律未提供業(yè)主大會會議無法決議時的解決辦法。除完善業(yè)主大會會議的議事規(guī)則之外,要根本解決該條款所折射出的問題,需要進行良好的制度設(shè)計,建立業(yè)主代表制度,采用集體討論、充分交換意見等方式,促進業(yè)主行使共同管理權(quán)。
[Abstract]:The owners' meeting is often held in the form of written consultation. If the owner does not feedback within the prescribed time, this provision is called "non-voting as valid consent" clause if the owner does not feedback within the prescribed time. In practice, the court supports the validity of this clause without exception, but the validity of this provision is problematic, the crux of which lies in the fact that Chinese law does not provide a solution when the owners' meeting cannot resolve it. In addition to perfecting the rules of procedure of the owners' meeting, in order to fundamentally solve the problems reflected in this clause, it is necessary to carry out good system design, establish the owner's representative system, adopt collective discussion, fully exchange views, and so on, so as to promote the owners to exercise their common management rights.
【作者單位】： 對外經(jīng)濟貿(mào)易大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【基金】：國家社會科學(xué)基金項目“創(chuàng)新社會管理背景下社區(qū)居民自治法律規(guī)制研究”(13CFX030)
【分類號】：D923.2;D901
，

本文編號：2506231