布迪厄司法場域理論探析
發(fā)布時間：2019-06-26 09:50
【摘要】：從社會理論的獨特視角出發(fā)解讀法律，有助于建立對法律及其運行環(huán)境的深刻理解。法國社會學(xué)家布迪厄以其體系完備、頗具解釋力的場域理論，，運用場域、資本、慣習(xí)、符號權(quán)力等獨特的理論分析工具，對司法場域進行了細致的分析，從社會理論的視角對什么是法律、法律的正當(dāng)性等法理學(xué)核心問題做出了回答。當(dāng)前法學(xué)界對布迪厄的研究尚不充分，應(yīng)積極挖掘布迪厄理論的法理學(xué)意義。 本文除引論和結(jié)語外，共分四部分。 第一部分闡述布迪厄提出司法場域的理論意圖。分析法學(xué)派視法律為獨立的規(guī)則實體，試圖構(gòu)建“純粹法律科學(xué)”，社會法學(xué)派則把法律視作一種實際活動、活的規(guī)范，認為在與政治、經(jīng)濟、社會、文化等因素的互動關(guān)系中才能正確理解法律。布迪厄認為這兩種理解法律的方式都有失偏頗，提出從司法場域出發(fā)理解法律。法律產(chǎn)生、運作于獨立的社會空間（司法場域），必須分析司法場域的結(jié)構(gòu)，將法律置于司法場域中才能認清法律的本質(zhì)與運作方式。布迪厄?qū)λ痉▓鲇虻姆治隽⒆阌谄洫毺氐纳鐣碚擉w系，運用了“場域”“慣習(xí)”“資本”“符號權(quán)力”等概念，試圖建立超越主客觀二元對立的關(guān)于法律實踐的總體性理解。 第二部分分析司法場域的構(gòu)成，描述其運作機制。司法場域是法律產(chǎn)生并運行于其中的社會空間，具有自身獨特運作邏輯。司法場域的自主性是法律獨立性的基礎(chǔ)，這體現(xiàn)為法律規(guī)范體系、法律語言、司法過程各方面。司法場域內(nèi)占據(jù)不同位置的行動者之間擁有不同形式和數(shù)量的資本，并在慣習(xí)的作用下行動、斗爭，推動了司法場域的變遷。 第三部分研究司法場域中的法律�，F(xiàn)代社會，法律是一種符號權(quán)力，能夠通過言辭行為改變社會結(jié)構(gòu)。法律符號權(quán)力的現(xiàn)實基礎(chǔ)在于其與社會權(quán)力結(jié)構(gòu)的一致性，而法律的普遍化、中立化等形式理性為法律提供了合法性論證。布迪厄從場域的視角出發(fā)對什么是法律和法律的正當(dāng)化機制進行了解析。 第四部分是對司法場域理論的評價。布迪厄司法場域理論是其社會學(xué)理論在法律領(lǐng)域的具體運用，力求從場域出發(fā)探尋法律的實踐邏輯。提出構(gòu)建一個獨立的社會空間（司法場域），由此出發(fā)對法律的本質(zhì)及其運作邏輯、合法化手段等進行了分析，區(qū)分了理論邏輯與實踐邏輯。并倡導(dǎo)反思性、關(guān)系主義思維的研究態(tài)度，具有很強的啟示意義。 結(jié)語對本文的思路進行了梳理和總結(jié)。司法場域理論以較短的理論篇幅，運用獨特的分析工具，對什么是法律與法律的正當(dāng)性問題做出了有特色、有解釋力的回答。布迪厄的研究方法也很獨特，對理論邏輯與實踐邏輯的區(qū)分、反思性的研究態(tài)度、關(guān)系主義的研究方法，都為我們解決兩大法學(xué)元問題（如何理解法律與如何研究法學(xué)）啟示頗多。
[Abstract]:Interpreting the law from the unique perspective of social theory is helpful to establish a profound understanding of the law and its operating environment. French sociologist Boudieu, with his well-systematic and explanatory field theory, makes a detailed analysis of the judicial field by using the unique theoretical analysis tools such as field, capital, habit, symbolic power and so on, and answers the core questions of jurisprudence, such as what is law and the legitimacy of law from the perspective of social theory. At present, the research on Bourdieu is not enough in the field of law, so we should actively excavate the legal significance of Bourdieu's theory. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, this paper is divided into four parts. The first part expounds the theoretical intention of Boudieu to put forward the judicial field. The analytical law school regards law as an independent regular entity and tries to construct "pure legal science". The school of social law regards law as a kind of practical activity and living norm, and holds that only in the interactive relationship with political, economic, social, cultural and other factors can the law be understood correctly. Boudieu believes that these two ways of understanding the law are biased and puts forward to understand the law from the judicial field. The law comes into being and operates in an independent social space (judicial field). It is necessary to analyze the structure of the judicial field and place the law in the judicial field in order to recognize the essence and mode of operation of the law. Boudieu's analysis of the judicial field is based on his unique social theoretical system, and uses the concepts of "field", "habit", "capital" and "symbolic power" to try to establish a general understanding of legal practice that transcends the subjective and objective binary opposition. The second part analyzes the composition of the judicial field and describes its operating mechanism. The judicial field is the social space in which the law comes into being and runs, which has its own unique operation logic. The autonomy of judicial field is the basis of legal independence, which is embodied in legal norm system, legal language and judicial process. The actors who occupy different positions in the judicial field have different forms and quantities of capital, and act and struggle under the action of habit, which promotes the change of the judicial field. The third part studies the law in the judicial field. In modern society, law is a kind of symbolic power, which can change the social structure through words and deeds. The realistic basis of legal symbolic power lies in its consistency with the structure of social power, and the universality and neutrality of law provide legitimacy demonstration for law. From the perspective of the field, Budieu analyzed what is the law and the legitimate mechanism of the law. The fourth part is the evaluation of judicial field theory. Boudieu's judicial field theory is the concrete application of his sociological theory in the field of law, and tries to explore the practical logic of law from the field. This paper puts forward the construction of an independent social space (judicial field), from which the essence of law, its operational logic and the means of legalization are analyzed, and the theoretical logic and practical logic are distinguished. It is of great significance to advocate the research attitude of reflective and relational thinking. The conclusion combs and summarizes the ideas of this paper. With a short theoretical length and a unique analytical tool, the judicial field theory gives a characteristic and explanatory answer to the question of what is law and the legitimacy of law. Boudieu's research methods are also very unique. The distinction between theoretical logic and practical logic, reflective research attitude and relational research methods all enlighten us to solve the two legal meta-problems (how to understand law and how to study law).
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D90-052
本文編號：2506103
[Abstract]:Interpreting the law from the unique perspective of social theory is helpful to establish a profound understanding of the law and its operating environment. French sociologist Boudieu, with his well-systematic and explanatory field theory, makes a detailed analysis of the judicial field by using the unique theoretical analysis tools such as field, capital, habit, symbolic power and so on, and answers the core questions of jurisprudence, such as what is law and the legitimacy of law from the perspective of social theory. At present, the research on Bourdieu is not enough in the field of law, so we should actively excavate the legal significance of Bourdieu's theory. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, this paper is divided into four parts. The first part expounds the theoretical intention of Boudieu to put forward the judicial field. The analytical law school regards law as an independent regular entity and tries to construct "pure legal science". The school of social law regards law as a kind of practical activity and living norm, and holds that only in the interactive relationship with political, economic, social, cultural and other factors can the law be understood correctly. Boudieu believes that these two ways of understanding the law are biased and puts forward to understand the law from the judicial field. The law comes into being and operates in an independent social space (judicial field). It is necessary to analyze the structure of the judicial field and place the law in the judicial field in order to recognize the essence and mode of operation of the law. Boudieu's analysis of the judicial field is based on his unique social theoretical system, and uses the concepts of "field", "habit", "capital" and "symbolic power" to try to establish a general understanding of legal practice that transcends the subjective and objective binary opposition. The second part analyzes the composition of the judicial field and describes its operating mechanism. The judicial field is the social space in which the law comes into being and runs, which has its own unique operation logic. The autonomy of judicial field is the basis of legal independence, which is embodied in legal norm system, legal language and judicial process. The actors who occupy different positions in the judicial field have different forms and quantities of capital, and act and struggle under the action of habit, which promotes the change of the judicial field. The third part studies the law in the judicial field. In modern society, law is a kind of symbolic power, which can change the social structure through words and deeds. The realistic basis of legal symbolic power lies in its consistency with the structure of social power, and the universality and neutrality of law provide legitimacy demonstration for law. From the perspective of the field, Budieu analyzed what is the law and the legitimate mechanism of the law. The fourth part is the evaluation of judicial field theory. Boudieu's judicial field theory is the concrete application of his sociological theory in the field of law, and tries to explore the practical logic of law from the field. This paper puts forward the construction of an independent social space (judicial field), from which the essence of law, its operational logic and the means of legalization are analyzed, and the theoretical logic and practical logic are distinguished. It is of great significance to advocate the research attitude of reflective and relational thinking. The conclusion combs and summarizes the ideas of this paper. With a short theoretical length and a unique analytical tool, the judicial field theory gives a characteristic and explanatory answer to the question of what is law and the legitimacy of law. Boudieu's research methods are also very unique. The distinction between theoretical logic and practical logic, reflective research attitude and relational research methods all enlighten us to solve the two legal meta-problems (how to understand law and how to study law).
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D90-052
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條
1 熊云輝;;司法場域的實證分析——以邱興華案為對象[J];西部法學(xué)評論;2008年03期
2 張心向;;論場域資本運作對刑事司法的影響——以布迪厄資本理論為分析視角[J];南開學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2009年02期
3 李全生;布迪厄場域理論簡析[J];煙臺大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2002年02期
本文編號：2506103
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2506103.html
