【摘要】：就我國(guó)而言,司法界和學(xué)術(shù)界對(duì)于輪奸案件的認(rèn)定存在很大的爭(zhēng)議。本文堅(jiān)持判例刑法學(xué)的研究方法,以我國(guó)現(xiàn)有的司法判決為依據(jù),在理論聯(lián)系實(shí)踐的基礎(chǔ)上,主要從理論和司法實(shí)務(wù)兩個(gè)層面對(duì)輪奸行為進(jìn)行把握,以對(duì)輪奸行為的定性和對(duì)輪奸行為人的量刑為主要內(nèi)容,并以兩種不同的犯罪論體系在認(rèn)定特殊的輪奸行為上的差異為視角,以求在合理解決輪奸行為的理論定性的前提下更好的指導(dǎo)我國(guó)的司法實(shí)踐。 具體而言,本文研究的內(nèi)容包括下列部分:第一,由一例強(qiáng)奸案出發(fā),引申出輪奸行為在司法實(shí)務(wù)認(rèn)定中存在的法理疑惑;第二,以司法實(shí)踐中對(duì)輪奸行為認(rèn)定的爭(zhēng)議為基點(diǎn),上升到對(duì)輪奸行為的理論定性探討,認(rèn)為輪奸行為是具有獨(dú)立犯罪構(gòu)成的定罪情節(jié),并在此基礎(chǔ)上分析了輪奸行為的構(gòu)成要件,認(rèn)為輪奸不限于輪流奸淫,二人以上基于各自奸淫的目的輪流實(shí)施了強(qiáng)奸罪手段行為或者目的行為之一的,均成立輪奸行為;第三,在解決了輪奸行為的理論定性的基礎(chǔ)上,進(jìn)一步認(rèn)為,在司法實(shí)務(wù)中,應(yīng)當(dāng)正確區(qū)分輪奸行為人的手段行為和目的行為,重視對(duì)輪奸行為犯罪故意的認(rèn)定,并就實(shí)務(wù)中多人實(shí)施強(qiáng)奸犯罪如何認(rèn)定輪奸行為的問(wèn)題提出了個(gè)人的觀點(diǎn);第四,分析親手犯理論在我國(guó)共同犯罪中沒(méi)有存在的余地,我國(guó)在輪奸案件的認(rèn)定上,應(yīng)當(dāng)堅(jiān)守共犯理論的根基,輪奸案件中既未遂形態(tài)不能并存;第五,在對(duì)行為定性的基礎(chǔ)上,上升到對(duì)行為人的量刑問(wèn)題研究,由對(duì)輪奸行為本身的研究上升到對(duì)輪奸行為人量刑的探討,在輪奸行為人的量刑問(wèn)題上,筆者認(rèn)為,我國(guó)司法部門走的是主從犯的量刑便利主義道路;應(yīng)當(dāng)區(qū)分個(gè)別行為人的行為未遂和整個(gè)犯罪的犯罪未遂,并以個(gè)別行為人的行為未遂作為認(rèn)定其屬于從犯的主要參考依據(jù);最后,筆者就輪奸行為的未完成形態(tài)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)問(wèn)題提出了個(gè)人的思考,認(rèn)為在輪奸行為獨(dú)立為一個(gè)新罪名的立法前提下,我們研究輪奸行為的犯罪構(gòu)成和未完成標(biāo)準(zhǔn)才更有意義。
[Abstract]:As far as our country is concerned, there is a great controversy over the identification of gang rape cases in the judicial and academic circles. This paper adheres to the research methods of case criminal law, based on the existing judicial decisions in our country, and on the basis of linking theory with practice, mainly grasps gang rape from two aspects of theory and judicial practice, takes the characterization of gang rape and the sentencing of gang rape as the main content, and takes the differences of two different crime theory systems in identifying special gang rape. In order to better guide the judicial practice of our country under the premise of reasonably solving the theory of gang rape. Specifically, the contents of this paper include the following parts: first, starting from a rape case, the legal doubts existing in the judicial practice of gang rape are derived; Second, based on the dispute over the cognizance of gang rape in judicial practice, it rises to the theoretical qualitative discussion of gang rape, holds that gang rape is a conviction plot with independent criminal constitution, and on this basis, analyzes the constituent elements of gang rape, and holds that gang rape is not limited to rotation adultery, and that more than two people have committed one of the acts of rape crime or purpose in turn on the basis of their own adultery. Group rape was established in all cases. Thirdly, on the basis of solving the theoretical qualitative analysis of gang rape, it is further believed that in judicial practice, we should correctly distinguish the means, behavior and purpose of gang rape, attach importance to the intentional identification of gang rape, and put forward some personal views on how to identify gang rape in practice. Fourth, there is no room for the theory of hand-committed crime in the joint crime of our country. In the identification of gang rape cases, we should adhere to the foundation of the theory of accomplice, and the attempted form can not coexist in gang rape cases. Fifth, on the basis of the qualitative analysis of the behavior, it rises to the study of the sentencing of the perpetrator, from the study of the gang rape itself to the discussion of the sentencing of the gang rape perpetrator. On the sentencing of the gang rape actor, the author believes that the judicial department of our country has taken the road of sentencing convenience of the principal and accomplice. We should distinguish between the attempted behavior of individual perpetrator and the attempted crime of the whole crime, and take the attempted behavior of individual actor as the main reference basis to identify it as an accomplice. Finally, the author puts forward personal thinking on the unfinished form standard of gang rape, and holds that under the premise that gang rape is independent as a new charge, it is more meaningful for us to study the criminal constitution and unfinished standard of gang rape.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國(guó)政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D924.3;D920.5

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

中國(guó)期刊全文數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù) 前10條

1 杜曉明;;德日犯罪論體系與我國(guó)犯罪論體系的關(guān)系[J];重慶科技學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年20期

2 李可;李曉明;;犯罪構(gòu)成·犯罪成立·犯罪——對(duì)刑法學(xué)三大基本范疇關(guān)系的審視與重構(gòu)[J];福建法學(xué);2001年02期

3 劉洪;;兩類犯罪參與體系理論比較研究——兼評(píng)我國(guó)刑法的犯罪參與體系[J];福建公安高等專科學(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2007年05期

4 馬克昌;改進(jìn)中國(guó)刑法學(xué)研究之我見(jiàn)[J];法商研究;2003年03期

5 高銘暄;談?wù)勅绾沃笇?dǎo)博士研究生的點(diǎn)滴體會(huì)[J];法學(xué)雜志;2005年02期

6 王俊平;;“共同實(shí)行犯的既遂與未遂形態(tài)并存說(shuō)”之質(zhì)疑[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2009年02期

7 劉士心;;論親手犯[J];刑法論叢;2007年01期

8 吳君霞;朱鳳翔;;解讀修正的犯罪構(gòu)成[J];四川警官高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2006年02期

9 王志祥;;情節(jié)加重犯基本問(wèn)題研究[J];政法論叢;2007年05期

10 張明楷;;法定刑升格條件的認(rèn)識(shí)[J];政法論壇;2009年05期

，

本文編號(hào)：2505749