【摘要】：正案情簡介趙先生是某市某公司員工,2006年7月入職,月平均工資4500元。從入職以來,公司均僅按照當(dāng)?shù)刈畹凸べY標(biāo)準(zhǔn)為基數(shù)繳納社會保險,繳費基數(shù)從2006年的810元逐步調(diào)整到2012年的1500元,盡管趙先生多次向公司提出,要求按照其全額工資為基數(shù)繳納社會保險,但公司一直不予理會。2012年3月中旬,趙先生以公司未依法足額繳納社會保險為由,向公司提出解除勞動合同。隨后,趙先生向當(dāng)?shù)貏趧尤耸聽幾h仲裁委員會申請勞動仲裁,要求公司依法為其足額繳納社會保險,并要求公司支付解除勞動合同的經(jīng)濟補償金。公司則抗辯稱,社會保險費由公司和個人繳費兩部分組成,由公司向該市社會保險中心繳納。多年來,公司全部按照社平工資繳納社會保險費,該市社會保險中心從未要求其整改過。
[Abstract]:Mr. Zhao is a company employee in July 2006, the average monthly salary is 4500 yuan. Since entering the service, the company has only paid social insurance on the basis of the local minimum wage, which has been gradually adjusted from 810 yuan in 2006 to 1500 yuan in 2012, although Mr. Zhao has repeatedly proposed to the company. Ask to pay social insurance according to its full wage base, but the company has been ignored. In mid-March 2012, Mr. Zhao proposed to the company to terminate the labor contract on the grounds that the company did not pay the social insurance in full according to the law. Subsequently, Mr. Zhao applied to the local labor and personnel dispute arbitration committee to apply for labor arbitration, asking the company to pay social insurance in full for it in accordance with the law, and to ask the company to pay economic compensation for the termination of the labor contract. The company defended that the social insurance premium was made up of two parts, the company and the individual, and paid by the company to the city's social insurance center. For many years, the company has paid social insurance premiums on equal wages, and the city's social insurance center has never asked it to be rectified.
【作者單位】： 上海市勞動人事爭議仲裁院;安徽大學(xué)法學(xué)院;南京大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【分類號】：D920.5;D922.5
，

本文編號：2415262