清代“家人求索”罪研究
[Abstract]:As the ancients said, "when you come to a great profit, you can say it is cheap." And he said, "greed and abandonment of righteousness will be the order of woe" 2. Since the emergence of the bureaucracy, the phenomenon of corruption has not disappeared. Whether in the feudal autocratic period or in the new period of building a socialist country, it is an important legal issue concerning the national economy and the people's livelihood. The administration of officials is an important part of the administration of the state and society in the past dynasties of China. The good or bad of the administration of officials is related to the national luck, and the focus of the administration of officials is to prevent and punish official crimes committed by officials. Thus, in ancient China, a complete set of prevention and legal regulations on job-related crimes was formulated, which has important theoretical value and practical significance for the current legal research and formulation. Based on the study of the laws and regulations of the Qing Dynasty, this paper reveals its practical significance by examining its historical origin and scope of contents. " The law of "family seeking" originates from the articles of "supervised property", "loan of temporary property", "servitude", and so on, which were merged into the law until the Ming Dynasty, followed by the Qing Dynasty and added some new examples. This law is a law and regulation that restricts officials' families to use the influence of officials to obtain property. It is comprehensive in content and wide in scope, especially in the Qing Dynasty. Through the study, we can clearly see that the rulers of the Qing Dynasty (especially the early emperors), in order to consolidate the Manchu regime and strengthen its dominant position, attach particular importance to the "supervision and treatment of government officials", who directly manage the society, whether or not they are clean and clean. As one of the emphases of the legislation, this law involves many aspects, such as borrowing, asking for, receiving gifts, extorting money and other related personnel, and so on, to restrict the behavior of the family of officials in the above aspects in order to maintain the order of government officials' governance. This article is divided into five parts, the second to the sixth chapter is the focus of the research, from tracing back to the historical origin of the "family search" law (including the content and formal origin), there is a macro understanding of the law, and then the modern crime theory as a method. To study the form, characteristics and treatment of the criminal content involved in the law, so that the reader can understand the specific content of the law deeply, and through the longitudinal and horizontal research to reveal the reason and influence of the existence of the "family claim" law. In order to history as a mirror, for the modern society to provide reference. Of course, the Qing Dynasty, as a feudal society ruled by Wang Quan, no matter how perfect it was in legislation and judicature, it could not avoid its demise. However, the study of "family search" can enable people to understand the history of the Qing Dynasty legislation (amending laws and regulations), to understand the historical background of the Qing Dynasty, to understand the characteristics and methods of the Qing Dynasty laws, and to understand the legislative techniques and methods at that time. The study of the laws and regulations of "Family search" reflects the sea from a drop of water, which enables people to have a deeper understanding of the legal system of the Qing Dynasty, which occupies an important position in the history of China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:武漢大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2017
【分類號(hào)】:D929
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 李曉蓉;論我國(guó)憲法的司法適用[J];六盤水師范高等專科學(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2004年01期
2 趙欣;;從憲法的屬性看憲法的司法適用[J];遵義師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年05期
3 陳太清;;憲法的司法適用芻議[J];市場(chǎng)周刊(理論研究);2007年11期
4 吳萏;;淺議憲法司法適用效力[J];法制與社會(huì);2009年02期
5 白冰;張淑萍;樊王妮;;習(xí)慣規(guī)則司法適用的困境及出路[J];理論月刊;2010年04期
6 黃威;生產(chǎn)、銷售偽劣商品罪的司法適用問(wèn)題淺析[J];紹興文理學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)("兩課"教學(xué)研究);2001年S1期
7 王學(xué)棟,任廣志;試論我國(guó)憲法司法適用的必然性[J];石油大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2002年02期
8 張斌;略論我國(guó)憲法司法適用的幾個(gè)特點(diǎn)[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2002年01期
9 唐作培,王鋒;非法占用農(nóng)用地罪的司法適用與理性思考[J];和田師范專科學(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2004年03期
10 王彥璋;李衛(wèi)玲;;淺談憲法的司法適用——憲法司法適用對(duì)公民基本權(quán)利的保護(hù)[J];中共烏魯木齊市委黨校學(xué)報(bào);2004年01期
相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前9條
1 許可;;論民法與國(guó)家——以“民事政策的司法適用”為視角[A];2013年第四屆全國(guó)民商法學(xué)博士生學(xué)術(shù)論壇論文摘要集[C];2013年
2 蔣憲平;;芻議黑社會(huì)性質(zhì)組織犯罪的司法適用[A];中國(guó)犯罪學(xué)研究會(huì)第三屆會(huì)員代表會(huì)議——暨第十一屆學(xué)術(shù)研討會(huì)會(huì)議論文[C];2002年
3 孫學(xué)亮;;公司社會(huì)責(zé)任的本質(zhì)及其司法適用[A];新規(guī)劃·新視野·新發(fā)展——天津市社會(huì)科學(xué)界第七屆學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)優(yōu)秀論文集《天津?qū)W術(shù)文庫(kù)》(中)[C];2011年
4 龔小輝;;試論利用影響力受賄罪的司法適用[A];贛臺(tái)法學(xué)論壇文集——江西省犯罪學(xué)研究會(huì)年會(huì)(2011年)[C];2011年
5 馮仁強(qiáng);;寬嚴(yán)相濟(jì)刑事政策司法適用解讀[A];第三屆國(guó)家高級(jí)檢察官論壇論文集[C];2007年
6 敖建平;黃晉軍;;瀆職侵權(quán)犯罪司法適用中幾個(gè)疑難問(wèn)題探析[A];贛臺(tái)法學(xué)論壇文集——江西省犯罪學(xué)研究會(huì)年會(huì)(2011年)[C];2011年
7 徐飛;;被誤讀的“避風(fēng)港”:檢視信息存儲(chǔ)空間“避風(fēng)港”規(guī)則的司法適用——兼論版權(quán)司法保護(hù)功利主義的式微[A];探索社會(huì)主義司法規(guī)律與完善民商事法律制度研究——全國(guó)法院第23屆學(xué)術(shù)討論會(huì)獲獎(jiǎng)?wù)撐募ㄏ拢C];2011年
8 鄧萬(wàn)飛;范大裕;;論單位共同犯罪的司法適用[A];第三屆貴州法學(xué)論壇文集[C];2001年
9 鄧萬(wàn)飛;范大裕;;論單位共同犯罪的司法適用[A];貴州法學(xué)論壇第三屆文集[C];2001年
相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條
1 常州市鐘樓區(qū)檢察院 謝國(guó)偉 陳翔;“利用影響力受賄罪”的司法適用[N];江蘇法制報(bào);2013年
2 方恒榮;風(fēng)俗習(xí)慣司法適用的路徑選擇[N];江蘇法制報(bào);2010年
3 鄭小苗 苗其寶;逾界建筑糾紛的司法適用[N];江蘇經(jīng)濟(jì)報(bào);2012年
4 常州市戚墅堰區(qū)檢察院 蔣超云;徇私舞弊不移交刑事案件罪的司法適用[N];江蘇法制報(bào);2009年
5 記者 蔣安杰;第三屆公司法司法適用高端論壇召開(kāi)[N];法制日?qǐng)?bào);2014年
6 新泰市人民檢察院 黃建民;寬嚴(yán)相濟(jì)刑事司法政策的司法適用[N];光明日?qǐng)?bào);2007年
7 周道鸞;從六起案件看97刑法的司法適用[N];法制日?qǐng)?bào);2008年
8 孔祥俊;WTO法律的國(guó)內(nèi)適用[N];法制日?qǐng)?bào);2001年
9 最高人民檢察院公訴廳 韓炳勛 北京市東城區(qū)人民法院 李雙慶;惡意欠薪犯罪在司法適用中的三個(gè)問(wèn)題[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2011年
10 周暉國(guó);知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法定賠償?shù)乃痉ㄟm用[N];江蘇法制報(bào);2006年
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 馬存利;憲法平等權(quán)司法適用研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2005年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條
1 朱千里;論司法適用審查[D];蘇州大學(xué);2006年
2 楊揚(yáng);我國(guó)公司社會(huì)責(zé)任的司法適用研究[D];昆明理工大學(xué);2015年
3 王思凡;關(guān)于環(huán)境污染罪司法適用的探討[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2014年
4 林亞琳;行政慣例司法適用的可行性研究[D];山東大學(xué);2015年
5 賴越超;自然人自首司法適用疑難問(wèn)題研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2015年
6 王一婷;銷售假冒注冊(cè)商標(biāo)的商品罪司法適用問(wèn)題研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2015年
7 陳帥;正當(dāng)防衛(wèi)司法適用的困境與出路[D];華東政法大學(xué);2015年
8 詹婷;中國(guó)古代判例的司法適用研究[D];湖南工業(yè)大學(xué);2016年
9 時(shí)璇;選擇性罪名的司法適用問(wèn)題研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2016年
10 徐圣暉;論我國(guó)民事習(xí)慣的司法適用[D];海南大學(xué);2016年
,本文編號(hào):2409300
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2409300.html